(allegedly) Gab has started to glow as some guy got arrested and charged with threatening the FBI through a post. I have no idea what this means but I'm assuming it means that Gab is not a safe place to post anymore. Thoughts?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Making substantiated threats of violence isn't exactly the same as expressing your ideas. Also, by saying "we should kill ___" you are drawing a line between yourself and any rational person that could have been open to your argument. It's like a form of ad hominem attack that is detrimental to your cause. Just use your noodle.
Optics? Who do you think "we" is? You are going to have to convince people (like me) that your ideas are worth considering. Otherwise when I read that a lunatic was killed in a standoff with police I'll just think "good" and keep scrolling.
"We" as in right-wing white dissidents. No, I do not have to convince cowards like you to do anything. You'll come around once things get hot, either that, or you'll be standing in the bread lines. If you think "good" after hearing about federal or state crimes against citizenry, then you are likely not interested in ever doing anything ever. You try to make this point, this very childish, immature, liberal view, which is that only irrational people choose violence.
Violence has been thrust upon us, whether you like it or not. Were Waco or Ruby Ridge moments where you thought "good"?
What about the civil war, did you think "good" when you learned of the war?
More ad hominem. You think this will convince me that you are right? You think this will convince anyone reading this that you are the rational one in this exchange?
> You'll come around
You sound like a Plan Truster™
> either that, or
At least you recognize that it's not inevitable that "we" will succeed. If you don't inspire your brothers to action then you will lose. You need to be a leader that others are willing to follow.
> federal or state crimes against citizenry
So dramatic! Laws follow the morality of the people. You have to change the minds of people or else yes I will root for the state against some lone actor.
Rational people are forced reluctantly into violence. You sound eager for it.
I don't know much about Ruby Ridge or Waco. If I trusted your opinion at all I could be convinced to look into it but you have been so hostile to me that I'm more interested in "winning" this argument. You can have the last word. I won't respond anymore to this thread but if you ad hominem attack me again I won lol.
You don't know about Waco or Ruby Ridge? Please, ignore everything else I've said and find multiple sources for the events and learn about them.
I won't give you the responses you want. I'm not a Trumpist, I never fell for him like others. I trust the Father's plan, which involves action on our part. So I'm also trusting my folk and our inborn talents. It actually is inevitable that we will succeed, you inferred incorrectly on that. YOU may not succeed, I may not succeed, but our folk will. That is not up to us to deny.
I call people cowards when it is appropriate. Your responses and stances are those of a coward. You should acknowledge and change yourself, so that you can become stronger. I can't do this for you.
I'm eager to see the recapitulation of my race. Since that will inevitably involve violence, you could indirectly say that I am eager for violence.
Here is an example of your cowardice: "You can have the last word. I won't respond anymore to this thread but if you…"
Most people will go along with the winner. They won't be convinced until the institutional power is already well within the grasp of the "rebels". During the War Of Independence, only like 5% of households actually took part, and even after they won there were still a majority that supported the crown.
Violence has been thrust upon us, whether you like it or not. Were Waco or Ruby Ridge moments where you thought "good"?
What about the civil war, did you think "good" when you learned of the war?
More ad hominem. You think this will convince me that you are right? You think this will convince anyone reading this that you are the rational one in this exchange?
> You'll come around
You sound like a Plan Truster™
> either that, or
At least you recognize that it's not inevitable that "we" will succeed. If you don't inspire your brothers to action then you will lose. You need to be a leader that others are willing to follow.
> federal or state crimes against citizenry
So dramatic! Laws follow the morality of the people. You have to change the minds of people or else yes I will root for the state against some lone actor.
Rational people are forced reluctantly into violence. You sound eager for it.
I don't know much about Ruby Ridge or Waco. If I trusted your opinion at all I could be convinced to look into it but you have been so hostile to me that I'm more interested in "winning" this argument. You can have the last word. I won't respond anymore to this thread but if you ad hominem attack me again I won lol.
I won't give you the responses you want. I'm not a Trumpist, I never fell for him like others. I trust the Father's plan, which involves action on our part. So I'm also trusting my folk and our inborn talents. It actually is inevitable that we will succeed, you inferred incorrectly on that. YOU may not succeed, I may not succeed, but our folk will. That is not up to us to deny.
I call people cowards when it is appropriate. Your responses and stances are those of a coward. You should acknowledge and change yourself, so that you can become stronger. I can't do this for you.
I'm eager to see the recapitulation of my race. Since that will inevitably involve violence, you could indirectly say that I am eager for violence.
Here is an example of your cowardice: "You can have the last word. I won't respond anymore to this thread but if you…"
People are sheep.