New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
22
clockwork orange reference (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by polskagurom on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror )
posted 1 year ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
I believe that if a person's ancestors were warriors and hunters they have better genetics when it comes to stuff like strength based activities and dimorphism.

Here are a few reasons why I speculate this:
- Nordics have some of the highest Yamnayan/Steppe DNA in the entire world
- Also are one of the strongest races

EHGs carried variants associated with taller stature, especially compared to early Neolithic farmers who migrated into Europe from the Near East.

They contributed genetically to later populations like the Yamnaya, who were also notably tall — averaging around 5'10" to 6' (178–183 cm), which was very tall for prehistoric times. And guess what these guys ate: FUCKING MAMMOTHS.

Modern north-European strongmens (Scandinavia, Finland, Baltic) are related to Yamnaya ancestry (or rather Western Steppe Herders), who were mix of Eastern Hunter Gatherers and Caucasian Hunter Gatherers.

Caucasus Hunter Gatherers. Probably high level of testosterone comes with them. Because the same situation is observed for all ethnic groups of Caucasus, Balkans, Carpaths. Balkan and Carpathian people also carry genes of Caucasian Hunter Gatherers.

Hunter gatherers in neolithic were bigger and stronger than the Anatolian neolithic farmers who were below average in height. Most people of Anatolian ancestry today are mainly southern Europeans (meds).

I am sure sexual selection played a role as well, but what do you guys think?
17
Troony Shekelstein (files.catbox.moe)
posted 1 year ago by CognitiveDissident5 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +17Score on mirror )
18
posted 1 year ago by CrossChatPM on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror )
15
posted 1 year ago by GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +15Score on mirror )
22
posted 1 year ago by derjudenjager on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +22Score on mirror )
12
The average woman voter. (www.youtube.com)
posted 1 year ago by WoodchipperSchool on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
51
posted 1 year ago by greenspotbikes on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +51Score on mirror )
10
I did my part (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by OftenWrong on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
44
#SnakeLivesMatter (media.scored.co)
posted 1 year ago by Verfassungsschmutz on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +44Score on mirror )
The book The Sword of Christ (Giles Corey, 2020) is written by a Christian to try to explain to White Supremacists how Christianity can help to stop the White Genocide.

But the book does not do this at all.
There is no analysis of White Genocide, how it is happening, or how to stop it.

The most immediate problem is that White women are being brainwashed by the media to breed with niggers.
Therefore you Christians need to explain how we can use Christian theology to explain to a young White woman that she should not marry a nigger. And then you need to explain to a young White man why he needs to fight to forcibly deport every non-white from our countries.
A second immediate problem of the White Genocide is that White women choose to have a career and adopt cats rather than having babies.

The book explains that racism is not a sin according to Christianity, and that Christianity doesn't demand open borders or the removal of social hierarchies and differences. I agree with this. But this has never been my argument. The arguments that White Supremacists make against Christianity are very simple:

1) If we have all been created by the same Father, that means that a nigger is your brother. If every human(oid) has the same father, that means that we as White people do not inherit our genetic traits and our soul from our ancestors (and therefore we don't transmit our unique racial soul across generations). So why should a White woman breed with a White man, if a random nigger is equally related to her? This sickening Judeo-Christian worldview, that a single creator made all humans on earth, is what led and still leads the Jews to miscegenate more than any other people.

2) If salvation is obtained individually by accepting Jesus Christ, there is no obligation and no advantage in having children. Your immortality is not reached through your children.

The book doesn't touch these things at all, i.e. it does not arm the reader with an ideological foundation for excluding non-whites from his household and land.
It makes some half-assed references to some Old Testament verses, without quoting them or discussing them. There are two problems: the savages that wrote the Bible never had a concept of "race" in the sense of biological inheritance. When God in the Old Testament tells the Jews to not marry foreigners it is explained that it is only to avoid the danger that the Jew who got married or his/her children abandon his/her faith. In fact God tells them to kidnap foreign young girls/babies and breed with them. And second, everything in the Old Testament is said by God to the Jews, at the same time when God said to the Jews that they have to kill or enslave all of the goyim (i.e. us). Therefore nothing in the Old Testament is valid for a Christian (unless you believe that Jews should rule over us); rabbi Paul explicitly said that the old law doesn't apply to the goyim.

The book also doesn't discuss the problem that if we were to impose Christian morality, particularly no sex before marriage, then White's birthrate will drop to zero. Particularly among the "college educated", which are the people we need the most to breed. You cannot seriously believe that anyone except a tiny minority of religious zealots would accept to marry someone without a test drive first. This was working in the middle ages because sex was the only pleasant thing that people (and women in particular) could do, but it could not work today when a man can play videogames or do a million of other things, and a woman can become a cat mum and spend her life doing Powerpoint presentations.

Another issue is that the vast majority of White Europeans are not Christians. Therefore putting forward a Christian identify separates White Americans from our ancestors and puts us closer to Christian niggers. Again, the book doesn't discuss this problem at all.

So what does the book discuss? I'm glad you asked. It goes on a rant against pornography which, hilariously, seems to be the biggest concern for Christians. The Christians believe that a young man or a young woman decides to not have a stable relationship and children because they prefer to watch porn / use sex toys / have casual sex instead (and the solution is simply to ban those things, of course). This is asinine, and having this opinion is clearly the sign of sexual repression or childhood abuse. If someone has such a weak mind to become addicted to pornography, then I as a White Supremacist do not want this person to reproduce. His mental defects need to removed from the gene pool. Ditto for faggots. It's bizarre how Christians insist that faggots need to put their penis in a vagina, while I'm thinking that it's a good thing if faggots are not forced to pass on their defective genes.

In fact, one thing that really made me think is how the author proudly proclaims in the book that Christianity saved his life from an unspecified addiction (I assume alcohol?). You see, if you are too feeble-minded to not be able to put down a bottle, then your opinion is worth less than nothing. How can I trust that you have enough critical thinking skills when you cannot even stop yourself from killing yourself?

And of course, the Jews. The vast majority of the book is recycled material against the Jews. Which was fun to read for me that I hate the Jews (although I already read most of the more detailed source material), but the fact is that Jews are not the most immediate problem today. Niggers and pajeets and bug people are. Jews are not going to outbreed us anytime soon. We lived with them for 2000+ years and if we exclude the specter of Bolshevism in the 20th century they never threatened the immediate destruction of our race like the hordes of niggers invading us and taking our women.

I would still recommend this book to ConPro users because, while completely failing in its stated goal, it still provides some good material against "progressive" Christianity, Christian Zionism, the guilt of slavery, and a tiny bit against Islam. So it's useful if you need to talk to a Christian who believes Christianity demands open borders. It's a decent read for Christian normies.



Final thoughts:

This book confirms my idea once again: Christians don't really care about the White race. This book is not about race, this book is just a rant against the kikes. Christians have a hate boner only against the Jews because they killed rabbi Jesus, and try to associate themselves with White Supremacy exclusively because they feel our increasing power of White racial consciousness, and want to exploit it for their true ends (like imposing sexual morality). Ashamed of their own failures, Christians try to appropriate the achievements of White Supremacy like if it had anything to do with their Jewish religion. In the last 2000 years the only time in which the Jews have been systematically targeted and mass murdered by an army of White men who had a solid ideological foundation that rationalized the mass murder of the Jews, this was done by a group that was certainly not Christian: the Einsatzgruppen led by Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler.

We will rise once again, and you Christians should just stay on the sidelines clutching pearls and reading your Jewish stories while we take care of niggers, shitskins, bug people, and especially the Jews.

Sieg Heil.

11
Uppity Nigger Things Pt.2 (m.youtube.com)
posted 1 year ago by Heliocentric on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +11Score on mirror )
When we call Black people the n-word, it divides our movement against our true enemies, the Jews. We need to do better, we need to extend the hand of brotherly love to our fellow man, or we are never going to beat back the degeneracy of the modern world. As a black man myself, I want to say that I forgive you for the hate that is in your heart, but that we must move past these childish antics.

I am calling on the moderators of ConsumeProduct to ban the n-word.
thank you for coming to my JeffTalk.
25
Nigga Heil Hitler (media.scored.co) 💩POST
posted 1 year ago by Captain_Raamsley on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +25Score on mirror )
posted 1 year ago by Jewfinder_General on scored.co (+0 / -0 )
Boo hoo hoo I hate boomers it's all their fault that my life sucks! Boo hoo hoo!

23
blue (cdn.videy.co)
posted 1 year ago by PopularCancer on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +23Score on mirror )
I'm a 26 year old American man of German descent who knows some German (B1) and has been to Germany, Austria, and Switzerland a few times. I excerise often, but like everything I must keep pushing myself. I am also Christian.

Are they ruined from the covid MRNA shot or sleeping around like American women? Is there a good way to meet/ approach them ie in a park, biergarten, a museum?

This might not be the place, but I would appreciate any advice.
55
posted 1 year ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +55Score on mirror )
Am I saying that "Nigga Heil Hitler" is a Jewish psyop? No. What I am saying is that, if it were, it wouldn't look any different.

The first verse is so ass it's almost painful to listen to. The synth trumpets sound godawful. As a person that has never touched FL Studio before I am 90% confident I could make a better beat. Then there is the atrocious autotune. It all comes off as intensely amateurish, the sort of thing your weird high school friend would show you.

As bad as it is, the music is not the most embarrassing part of this song - the lyrics are. The lyrics in the first verse uses therapy speak to essentially apologize for the rest of the song:

I got so much anger in me, got no way to take it out

He is acknowledging that saying "Heil Hitler" and worshipping Hitler is just a coping mechanism. He's not a bad guy, he just has demons that he doesn't know how to take care of!

In fact, the song really doesn't have almost anything to do with Hitler, outside of just saying his name several times and playing a Hitler speech. There's no ranting about "degenerates", no discussion of the need for a final solution, heck, he doesn't even say anything about how badass war is (which you would think would make perfect sense in a rap song, which normally fetishize violence)

I guess if there is any subtle irony in this song, as OP suggests, it would be between the Nazi image of strength and Kanye's own weakness. Kanye is weak in several ways. He is weak in that he considers the decay of his family to be outside of his control, that he is just a pebble being whisked along by the streams of life. He is also weak in that he refuses to commit to even saying anything in his song without apologizing for it.

Then there is the chorus. I mean, it's catchy, sure, but it is hardly a masterpiece of music. It's pretty far from his best work.

I don't believe that there are lots of black Nazis out there, as Kanye implies ("all my niggas Nazis"). The most I can guess is that he wants more black people to be Nazis, but again, from the rest of the song, he hasn't really given black people any reason to be Nazis. He's mostly just talked about how much of a cuck he is and how much his own life sucks. I think that your average black person is going to find it a little silly to join a group of people who seem to be white supremacists.

He did manage to get a few blacks together for the song, which is impressive. I still maintain that some of them were white people in blackface.

In conclusion, it is a funny song, but it is not hecking profound or full of meaning. Any meaning you find in it was projected by you onto the song.
Toast message