New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
posted 11 days ago by somerandomname on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror )
60
Slippery Slope (media.scored.co)
posted 11 days ago by shmuklipoopoo on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +60Score on mirror )
posted 10 days ago by SNES_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 )
I think it's important people are clear what they mean by "nationalism". I see too often people from all sides of the political spectrum talking about it either good or bad without really understanding what it means.

One of the core ideas they get wrong is that someone can "join" another nation. That's not really true. A Russian living in England does not become English. Maybe his grand-kids might be, but only if he works at actually adopting the culture, language and customs of the English people. Just because you are living in a country and you have a passport and you have voting rights does NOT make you a "real" citizen of that country.

America lost its way because we lost this fact. We have this idea that we can import people from all over the world and somehow maintain our national identity. We can't. All we end up doing is becoming a colonized state made up of those various countries. It's not just a skin color thing, as Germans, French, Irish and Italians, probably the closest national cousins (if there is such a thing) still haven't really integrated into the American identity.

If we are going to create a "nation" of Americans, it must be by blood and race. That is the ONLY way a people can come together as a nation. It's in the very name. "Nation" has the same root word as "native" and "natal", having to do with birth. National status is transferred from parents to children, and it can be done no other way. Nations are made up of countless families all interlocked with marriages. A French man and an American woman get married and have kids, and those kids can become American if the wife's family gets involved. That French man can become part of their family, and when his kids intermarry with other Americans, then the fate is all but sealed. "Grandpa was from France, but I don't know what that means, because all my other grandparents are American" is what we should be hearing from our kids.

Real nationalists understand this. They understand that you build a nation not by integrating foreign people into your country (which has the OPPOSITE effect) buy by raising FAMILIES. If someone wants to join us, they must come by marriage or not at all.

You guys think back to how the Latter-day Saints (AKA mormons) built a NATION within the United States. Every institution in the US tried to destroy us, so we had to flee to the middle of a God-forsaken desert to colonize it. And we succeeded, somehow.

We kick-started the process by taking advantage of plural marriage. The explicit purpose of plural marriage was to accelerate the growth of natural-born "citizens" of our nation. God commanded us to do it because he wanted more babies. So those involved with it got to work, and had tons of babies. My own ancestor had more than 10 wives and nearly 100 children. Think about that. Every waking moment he spent making new babies, supporting his families, and preparing homes where new babies could be born. Everything else was a means to that end. Today, I constantly run into distant cousins who are all related by this one man. 100 babies became 1,000 became 10,000 became 100,000 in a matter of generations. At some point in the future, there's a chance that almost everyone on planet earth will see him as their ancestor.

If there is going to be an American nation in 10, 20, 50 years it will only be because the people in this nation are getting married and having LOTS of kids. Nowadays, with a modern understanding of health and fitness, there is no reason why a healthy, young woman can't have 20 kids before reaching menopause. The fact that we don't see young women choosing to do this means that our nation is dying. Those young women, and the young men who simp for them, are dead-ends, useless branches.

But can you imagine a future when most young women choose to become mothers of large families? Imagine if in 2030 this is the new standard arrangement. All the young women coming of age seek a husband who wants to make lots of kids and support them. Then they get to work making babies. By 2050, they have already had 10-20 kids, and their oldest children are setting off to start a new life with their spouses. How many people will be alive in 2130? Thousands and thousands from a single person. As an old woman, she'll have her grandkids visit her and it will be an endless parade. On her birthday, the mail truck will be full of birthday cards and well-wishes. Family reunion photos will need to be taken by drone.

If we are going to have a WHITE future, it is only because WHITE PEOPLE are going to reproduce in record numbers. THERE IS NO OTHER WAY. If you care about that, then you MUST be having lots of babies RIGHT NOW.

Our new president and prophet pointed this crucial fact out in his latest general conference address. Sure, the birth rate among latter-day saints is higher than our neighbors, but it is not nearly high enough. Everyone young and old should be focused on creating more life and raising that life successfully.

In my own life, with 5 kids of my own, I'm still surprised when people say I have a "large" family. No I don't. I grew up with more siblings than that, and if it were physically possible for my wife we'd have ten more kids. Historically, 5 kids is a small family. We need to change our mindset on these things. There's multiple families in my community with more than 5 kids. Even the "liberal" members of my church have that many at a minimum.

REAL nationalists are doing the "natal" thing a lot. They are creating more and more babies, as many as they can. They are not goose-stepping or thinking about taking over governments or winning elections. Those things ultimately are inconsequential compared to the monumental task of raising the next generation. No babies means there's nothing worth fighting over because you already lost.

**REAL nationalists are thus "NATALISTS".**

The fact that the jews are screaming that this is the new form of anti-semitism is all you need to know. Your enemies are TELLING YOU every day what they fear the most! THEY FEAR WHITE BABIES! They fear CHRISTIAN babies! They fear babies raised to learn right from wrong and trained to make their own families and have lots and lots of kids!
72
posted 11 days ago by genesisSOC on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +72Score on mirror )
So Trump voiced his idea of 50-year mortgages. This is insane -- only if you assume there is an interest charge.

What would you think of 50-year mortgages with zero percent interest for families with more than 5 kids? Like, each child knocks off the interest rate by a little bit. Add in a condition that the parents must stay together to claim the benefit...

Property taxes can also be used this way. Allow states to levy high property taxes, but then set them to all but zero for the primary homes of families with children. No kids? No tax benefit.

Obviously we'd have to control what sort of people can take advantage of these offerings.

Realistically, the way we make housing more affordable is to make more housing. Right now there are no real estate developers thinking "I can make a lot of money dividing up land into 1 acre lots with 1,000 sf homes on them." Why not? Because no one wants that. Or if they do, they can't afford it. What's going on? I think it's the whole paradigm of "my house is my investment" and banks getting involved. Houses used to be something you could buy for a few years of wages. No one used to own a home they couldn't rebuild in less than a year on their own or that they couldn't afford to rebuild. We need more builders, we need more individuals building their own homes, and we need to get banks out of the picture. Use cash for these kinds of transactions, not credit and certainly not loans.

Manufactured homes are a real thing. They are not ridiculously expensive. Lots of low-income workers buy them in my area. They want a home that they don't have to borrow money to build on land they didn't have to borrow money to buy. It's a very good solution. My grandparents lived in a double-wide when they retired. That was their "dream" home. If you can't afford a manufactured home, you can probably find a used trailer house. Yes, they suck, but they are functional and cheap and they're not hard to maintain.

The point is there's ways to "fix" the real estate market that don't involve government regulations.

Here's another idea.

I've already seen land co-ops going up and there are quite a few. You have to look for them and many just aren't available to the general public (as it should be.) The basic idea is you pool people's resources, buy a bunch of land, and then build your own homes on that land. If you get 5-10 young families involved, they could "purchase" construction services from each other. "You help me build my house, I'll help you build yours" type deals. The only thing you need to buy is construction materials and the land. If this sounds appealing, look into it, I think a lot of homesteaders want something like this, and if they are in a small tight-knit community with other like-minded people all the better.

My particular take on the land co-op thing is to have a corporation that is owned exclusively by the people who live on it. Buy something like 1,000 acres and use it for agriculture. Hire employees, mostly from the owners of the corporation, or divide up the land among them for their own purposes. Some of them can run cattle, goat, sheep, chickens, etc.. and the others do various kinds of farming. Rotate the land over the years for maximum yields with minimum inputs. Give each owner a small half-acre lot in a corner of the land, build a little playground and a community hall or something and have each person live in a small house. Since ownership in the corporation is tied to actually living there, there's no chance of outside investors taking over, especially if you actually make a successful farm.

I think suburbs are done for. They're no longer useful. Just like cities became useless once mass transit became a thing, suburbs are no longer essential since we don't need to commute to work for most jobs. It makes way more sense for someone to plop down a factory in the middle of nowhere, especially since you don't need thousands of workers to keep that factory working. I can see a time where, just like in the past, your job and your home were almost the same thing.

Stop expecting government to solve your problems. Think really hard about what the real problem is and you'll find your own solutions, just like your ancestors did.
White Women (www.youtube.com)
posted 11 days ago by SNES_X on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +2Score on mirror )
33
posted 11 days ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +33Score on mirror )
31
Mein Kampf 728 (media.scored.co)
posted 11 days ago by BreadandWinePilled on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +31Score on mirror )
38
posted 11 days ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +38Score on mirror )
10
posted 11 days ago by TacosForTrump on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
38
Are we the baddies? (cdn.videy.co)
posted 11 days ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +38Score on mirror )
12
posted 11 days ago by BlackPillBot on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +12Score on mirror )
19
posted 11 days ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +19Score on mirror )
18
posted 11 days ago by linden687 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror )
posted 11 days ago by GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +8Score on mirror )
18
posted 11 days ago by OnlyFriends on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +18Score on mirror )
posted 11 days ago by Vlad_The_Impaler on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
10
Nooo you don't say! (cdn.videy.co)
posted 11 days ago by RealWildRanter on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +10Score on mirror )
43
posted 12 days ago by KyleIsThisTall on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +43Score on mirror )
Toast message