Consume Product

I see posts in the wild too often about people worried about eating chemicals they spray on plants to make them grow better, but hardly anyone truly understands what's really going on.

A nation cannot be better than its soil. If its soil is strong and vibrant, then they will have plenty of healthy crops and a healthy population. If their soil is weak, then they will die off because they cannot get healthy no matter what they do.

The key to understanding all of this is in understanding how God created the world we live in, or if you prefer, how the natural world actually works. The key concept is the feedback loop. A feedback loop is an engineering / science concept that involves the output of a system feeding back into the input of the system, and creating a chain reaction that amplifies the result.

Let me give you an example of a healthy feedback loop: You spend your time working out, and you get stronger, and you get healthier, and you are able to do your work quicker, so you have more free time which you spend on working out and getting stronger, etc...

The key feedback loop is in the soil. "Soil" and "Dirt" are two different things. "Soil" is a living ecosystem of tightly integrated molds, funguses, bacteria and insects. They thrive in healthy soil, creating black earth that is rich with nutrients and life. Plants planted in that soil put their roots deep into the earth and send signals to the creatures living there about what sorts of nutrients they need. Plants actually feed the soil and the soil feeds them. Healthy plants create healthy soil. Healthy soil creates healthy plants. It's a virtuous cycle because it creates more and more good things.

Farmland isn't discovered. It is created. Farmers who know what they are doing are able to take virgin land and in a few decades convert it to healthy living fields capable of growing crops year after year. At least we USED TO know how to do this. We've all but forgotten the techniques our ancestors used, the same techniques that made Europe a bread basket for the world.

When our ancestors came to the Americas, they discovered an agricultural industry that was pathetic and weak, with the Native Americans slowly poisoning their soil, moving on and poisoning new soil. They had converted the rich abundance that once dominated this continent into a continent barely able to sustain life.

The Regenerative Revolution is (or at least was) a revolution in how we think about farming and the soil and how we grow food. The key idea was that we need to treat the soil with respect and focus on building up the soil rather than forcing it to increase yields year after year. Talk to any regenerative farmer for more than 5 minutes and they'll start talking about soil and how they're trying to create more of it and keep what they have from washing away into the river.

Now that you understand what's really going on, you understand what the jews did to destroy the US. Chemical fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, modern plowing, etc... all KILL the soil on an industrial scale. Go visit any farm which bought wholesale into this philosophy of chemical agriculture and you'll see that their soil is DEAD. They spend all of their time trying to kill things rather than growing things. They have a childish and amateur understanding of the soil as if it were a bookshelf you put books on, or a store you buy and sell goods at.

The TRUE danger of chemicals in our agriculture industry is not poisonous foods that are devoid of any nutrition. After all, we can neutralize poisons and wash them off, or even supplement food with nutrients if need be. The TRUE danger is that it KILLS our farmlands.

Go out there and join the revolution and start creating healthy soil in your own backyard. Healthy soil creates healthy nations. We NEED our soil if we are going to survive what has already started happening.

I want to preface this with two statements: One, I apologize if this is not the right place to post. ConsumeProduct seems to be a gathering place for people who question established narratives, so hopefully this fits. And two, on the face of it, this seems like an insane question. But I don't know if an insane person can witness his own psychosis, and I do feel pretty grounded.

I have no strong evidence that nuclear weapons don't exist. But it seems bizarre that, in the 80 years since the US nuked Japan, no rogue state or terrorist group has detonated a dirty bomb in an enemy city.

I have slowly been waking up to the layers of deception that countries throw on their citizens. For me, one of the biggest ones is the lie that HIV is deadly. Without derailing into too much detail, the virus is harmless, and many people get diagnosed with AIDS despite testing negative, while many others test positive for HIV but don't get diagnosed with AIDS (and the criteria vary widely from country to country, e.g. AIDS in Africa aligns much more closely with malnutrition). And Fauci and the US government capitalized on this hoax in order to make people more afraid and less connected with each other, because such people are easier to control. And what I see playing out over and over again is governments layering in their deception, so that when someone starts questioning one lie, they have no idea where to stop. For instance, health experts in the US tell us that we need to circumcise newborn baby boys in order to prevent the spread of HIV. But circumcision is insane even before the HIV claim, and the claim itself is nonsense, and HIV is not even dangerous. This apparatus also lies more generally, e.g. telling us that the polio virus rather than insecticides paralyzed people in the 40s.

So, the existence of nuclear weapons seems like another great way to instill fear in people: "Don't live your life, you might die in a horrible explosion at any second." (I believe the claims of global warming operate in a similar manner.) But that on its own is not a convincing reason to disbelieve something. I know that Israel stole nuclear secrets from the US, and they probably assassinated JFK when he wanted to inspect their nuclear facilities. Is this part of the layered deception? Netanyahu keeps telling the world that we need to destroy Iran because they will soon have nuclear bombs, but he wants them destroyed regardless, and this sounds like the exact same pretext Israel used in order to make the US destroy Iraq.

I've heard the narrative that the US actually firebombed Japan, and we pretended we have nuclear weapons to posture against the Soviets. Chernobyl was a wasteland for decades (or still is?), and yet Hiroshima and Nagasaki supposedly recovered just fine? I can't imagine a nuclear facility would have magnitudes more energy than a weapon created explicitly to destroy an enemy nation.

Over the last few months, I became convinced that the Holocaust did not happen in the traditional sense: Yes, Hitler put Jews in concentration camps, but this was because Jews declared war on Germany. I don't see this action as fundamentally different from what the US did to the Japanese. And I think the 271,000 casualties that the Red Cross reported happened when the Allies bombed German supply lines and they could no longer feed anyone. Maybe Hitler planned on killing them once he could no longer use them to fuel his war machine, but the gas chamber narrative is utterly ridiculous.

Anyway, I say all this to highlight what looks like another layered deception. I know that Hitler removed Jews from universities, talking about how he didn't want Jewish physics in academia. When I first heard this, I scoffed, because surely nothing could be more objective than physics. But academics have acknowledged for a long time that physics has stagnated, and this stagnation appears to have happened ever since we discovered relativity and quantum mechanics. If the bombs only functioned because of breakthroughs in relativity, but the bombs didn't actually exist, does this mean that relativity is also a lie? Was Einstein another piece of propaganda in order to praise Jewish supremacy?

Writing this out even sounds insane to me. Aside from a few thin conspiratorial strands here, I have no reason to doubt that relativity and quantum mechanics are real. And as I understand them (which is not much), their existence allows technologies like GPS and microchips to function. But a few years ago, I faced the same bizarre dichotomy in the face of vaccines: Okay, I said, the covid vaccine is bullshit. But *surely* health officials were not lying to me for the last hundred years about the efficacy of all of these *other* vaccines...right? But now I know that they are all also useless poison, and this narrative is omnipresent, and anyone who questions their holy status gets ruthlessly attacked.

I could go off on so many tangents here, but I should wrap this up. I would be very interested in any books you know of that argue that nuclear weapons do not exist (or that they do). For a few years now, I've started to feel vaguely the same way about the moon landings, i.e. that they never happened and were another lie propagated by the US to posture against the Soviets (or at least to steal taxpayers' money to fund horrible shit). But when I looked for arguments for this position, I found them pretty weak, so maybe I'm far off the mark here and we just had shitty cameras or something back then.

Thank you for your time.