All boards

 
Live with Dr Stephen Pidgeon in the United Kingdom, Lutterworth Town Hall Leicestershire - Day 1 [1.51.44]
https://www.brighteon.com/8f7dacef-a665-4041-8e09-79b8e02cfb9b
 
 
Day 2: Live at Lutterworth Town Hall Leicestershire with Dr. Stephen Pidgeon hosted by Jessica and Shane Knock of Eatin Wild Honey and Locusts. [1.53.31]
https://www.brighteon.com/a57e6587-8518-4ee6-98d9-f1cca510ae49
 
 
"Answers for our Time" Day 3 with Dr Stephen Pidgeon in the United Kingdom. " Feast of Trumpets." [1.14.49]
https://www.brighteon.com/8d333ae6-97dd-4892-b6e9-6e68465b385f

Richard Walther Darré (July 14, 1895 – September 5, 1953). Darré was a leading philosopher of the Blut und Boden (Blood and Soil) concept. He was a brilliant, gifted and spiritual person.
  
  
  
http://www.mourningtheancient.com/3-23-2016-1x.htm
  
  

title
 
(I mean like against flu, tetanus, measles, etc. vaccines for humans and whatever diseases with animals, all vaccines basically)

James Mason the author of a famous book, is interviewed by the Christcuck grifter, Bob Larson
  

Supreme Court to scrutinize U.S. protections for social media | Reuters
https://www.reuters.com/legal/supreme-court-scrutinize-us-protections-social-media-2022-10-03/
October 3, 2022 By Andrew Chung
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a challenge to federal protections for internet and social media companies freeing them of responsibility for content posted by users in a case involving an American student fatally shot in a 2015 rampage by Islamist militants in Paris.
The justices took up an appeal by the parents and other relatives of Nohemi Gonzalez, a 23-year-old woman from California who was studying in Paris, of a lower court's ruling that cleared Google LLC-owned YouTube of wrongdoing in a lawsuit seeking monetary damages that the family brought under a U.S. anti-terrorism law. Google and YouTube are part of Alphabet Inc (GOOGL.O).
The Supreme Court also agreed to hear a separate appeal by Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) of the lower court's decision to revive a similar lawsuit against that company, though not on the basis of Section 230 ....
 
The Supreme Court and the internet's future, explained
https://web.archive.org/web/20221005124314mp_/https://theweek.com/supreme-court/1017215/the-supreme-court-and-the-internets-future-explained
https://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-internets-future-explained-094609268.html
Joel Mathis, October 5, 2022,
The Supreme Court is about to decide the future of the internet.
The court this week agreed to hear a case involving Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which shields internet providers from lawsuits over material posted online by users. The law "helped enable the rise of huge social networks like Facebook and Twitter," ...
"If the Supreme Court erodes Section 230 immunity, it could create a nightmare scenario not just for Big Tech but for anyone [who] runs a website with user-generated content," Axios notes. Legally speaking, then, the whole internet might be up for grabs.