I've seen that hitler quote and I imagine many capitalists would agree. which is why communism, capitalism, and socialism can be bad and confusing terms. Some communists literally want to be left alone, like libertarian peaceful hippies. And sometimes it works out kind of in those communes. But at a loss of efficiency. and maybe some rights.
might be good to clarify that you're not for aggressive imperialism, war, other violent actions. I do not assume all natsocs are, but you get larpers who call for "another holocaust" just to make natsocs look bad. I imagine a few are also for that, which I'm not personally, and don't think natsocs really should be for. might be good to abandon the "socialist" title as it is confusing, idk what would be better.
so you would be ok with capitalism with a gentile in charge? but don't want things like usury.
Socialism has the economic calculation problem so people avoid it for that reason: https://infogalactic.com/info/Economic_calculation_problem
and regarding authoritarianism, it requires that you have good leaders. that leadership can be taken over and then you're in trouble. which is why people like freedom in contrast. The private institutions in freedom can also be taken over, but there is freedom to compete to try to make good ones if that happens, which doesn't exist in an authoritarian order. I'm a little more indifferent on if there is authoritarian or libertarian order or lack thereof, it the governments or institutions just need to have "conservative" values.
might be good to clarify that you're not for aggressive imperialism, war, other violent actions. I do not assume all natsocs are, but you get larpers who call for "another holocaust" just to make natsocs look bad. I imagine a few are also for that, which I'm not personally, and don't think natsocs really should be for. might be good to abandon the "socialist" title as it is confusing, idk what would be better.
so you would be ok with capitalism with a gentile in charge? but don't want things like usury.
Socialism has the economic calculation problem so people avoid it for that reason: https://infogalactic.com/info/Economic_calculation_problem
and regarding authoritarianism, it requires that you have good leaders. that leadership can be taken over and then you're in trouble. which is why people like freedom in contrast. The private institutions in freedom can also be taken over, but there is freedom to compete to try to make good ones if that happens, which doesn't exist in an authoritarian order. I'm a little more indifferent on if there is authoritarian or libertarian order or lack thereof, it the governments or institutions just need to have "conservative" values.