New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
deleted
posted 2 years ago by [deleted] (+6 / -0 ) Edited 2022-02-19 07:35:20
deleted
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
deleted 2 years ago 4 points (+4 / -0 ) 1 child
Account purged by its owner
2 years ago 5 points (+5 / -0 ) 2 children
Yeah it takes a lot of cohencidence noticing to break through a lifetime of propaganda. I think pointing them at vague 'globalists' is a good first step, even if they mostly blame the chinks like they do on TD. Pointing out what people like George Soros, Klaus Schwab, Bill Krystol, and Chuck Schumer have in common can come later.
None
-1
2 years ago -1 points (+1 / -2 )
I agree but for a different reason. Calling the perpetrators globalists or illuminati or cabalists is perfectly accurate and baggage-free by their public actions. Calling them satanists is also valid when there is public symbolism data. Those who know the Hebrew origin of cabal and satan will agree; the first "satanists" were necessarily Semitic by definition.
 
Calling them The Jews hastily unnecessarily makes us attackers of their children and loses our focus on the shabbos goyim like Cecil Rhodes, Alfred Milner, Carroll Quigley, and Nancy Pelosi. I'm now saying NAME THE JEW, and the satanist, for real, rather than just naming "The Jews", blaming the group without making real or specific charges. The based are shown by their ability to name names.
None
Toast message