After I made the mistake of providing a source ("Known grifter! Far-right bigot! You don't have a ReAL sOuRCe!!¡"), I imagine their call to be something like a retarded crow, mimicking human speech without understanding.
I'm not a fan of arguing right wing talking points using sources and statistics.
Nobody goes to explore black neighborhoods. If you tell me black people don't commit crime then I know you're worthless lying sack of shit. Debate over.
I remember a discussion on reddit about the book "Sex and culture" by JD Unwin. The author studied cultures around the world and found the pattern that cultures which value virginity until marriage thrive, whilst these who allow promiscuity die. Redditard then said: "correlation is not causation"
10 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
"Sorry, I'm going to need a double blind peer reviewed source for this along with a signed confirmation from at least 3 Nobel Prize winners" - Some reddit fucktard
6 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
I don't provide sources anymore. Inquisitive minds know of what I'm usually talking about it or they ask for more information. If you provide the source, that person then will attempt to scrutinize it to find some small flaw that they can use to dismiss the information. Thus providing a source becomes a fruitless exercise.
5 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
When one of those fucktards ask for a source, my response is, "If you don't know, then you're not knowledgable enough speak with about this topic. Shush."
"Sour-CES?! CAW!! Reliable sour-CES?!"