3 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)2 children
It's clear and obvious that intelligence is mostly genetic. It is said by Wikipedia that ~80% of intelligence is genetic, but that value varies. True, because in brownoid shitholes, the rate of decreasing factors (domestic abuse, severe malnourishment, ESPECIALLY incest) are so high, that they are a massive factor to be considered. For them that value is 80% or even below. For us, it's 85%+, whereas the remaining 15% are basically libtard bullshit factors, especially focusing on children below 25, where cognitive development is not stabilized yet (IQ varies below the age of 25, which is due to IQ being based on age integers and varying development rates).
But if you exclude this, the value would come closer to 95-100% for Whites - there is NO WAY to increase a person's intelligence. IQ itself is slightly fallible because it is based on tests, whereas people can have bad days, be stressed, be sloppy, careless, trained, dedicated. On a large scale however, comparing countries and larger groups, it is useful though, because all these variances cancel each other out.
It doesn't matter what scientists say, because they are utterly retarded. They want to be "nice" so badly, they will say whatever is approved by (((communists))) and (((financiers))) instead of the truth.
> there is NO WAY to increase a person's intelligence.
There is. It's called "pain."
> whereas people can have bad days
The faggoty world we live in coddles people. It makes them think "bad days" are significant of anything other than their egos. It rewards intellectual laziness and punishes merit.
> So I reject the opinions of retarded scientists.
Using anecdote to fight anecdote. Let me know how that works out for you in the long run.
You know this type of "medical analysis" is used to implement public health policy and laws and such.
Remember when the government health organizations tried to force gun control measures as a public health issue? And again with climate change? its the same with "muh racism"
We cant cling to our guns or give up and live off grid in the words, we need to take over these institutions from the inside if we want make changes we want to see.
Actual science : the structural effects of race determining a childs brain development.
But if you exclude this, the value would come closer to 95-100% for Whites - there is NO WAY to increase a person's intelligence. IQ itself is slightly fallible because it is based on tests, whereas people can have bad days, be stressed, be sloppy, careless, trained, dedicated. On a large scale however, comparing countries and larger groups, it is useful though, because all these variances cancel each other out.
It doesn't matter what scientists say, because they are utterly retarded. They want to be "nice" so badly, they will say whatever is approved by (((communists))) and (((financiers))) instead of the truth.
So I reject the opinions of retarded scientists.
We do it intentionally.
It's a "good way" to preserve the dominant genetics of a line.
Look at any race horses lineage chart and you'll see this immediately.
There is. It's called "pain."
> whereas people can have bad days
The faggoty world we live in coddles people. It makes them think "bad days" are significant of anything other than their egos. It rewards intellectual laziness and punishes merit.
> So I reject the opinions of retarded scientists.
Using anecdote to fight anecdote. Let me know how that works out for you in the long run.