“The water” is a distraction. It’s completely meaningless. The point of “artificial intelligence” data centers is to exterminate you. Their existence in any form and under any requirements has to be opposed.
3 days ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)4 children
The water in question needs to be distilled and then purified heavily before going into a chilled water loop and mixed at a 50/50 ratio with glycol. These are closed loop systems, meaning that once the system is filled, it does not use more. Which means that once a system is filled, it doesn't use anymore resources, which means the aquifers refill.
Where does this protect the water thing come from?
3 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It is suicidal to run untreated water thru a chiller to reach 40F. That is the temperature the water needs to be to flow into CRAH units to chill a data center. At above 48F, water is no longer able to work against the heat load in a data center. If a datacenter reaches 80F, the hard drives start failing as the temperature of the air is not able to offset the heat load.
How do you think cooling systems work in datacenters?
None of this is relevant, I don't even know what point you're trying to make.
Jewgle's datacenters use water, period. By their own admission:
> In 2024, we consumed a total of approximately 8.1 billion gallons (31 billion liters
or 31 million cubic meters) of water across our data centers (excluding those operated by third parties)
If that's the configuration, why would they not be set up for a geothermal heat pump configuration where they could dump the water in a different end of the aquifier?
> Where does this protect the water thing come from?
Google's own admission: https://www.gstatic.com/gumdrop/sustainability/google-2025-environmental-report.pdf
> To operate smoothly, these facilities rely on cooling systems that frequently use water due to its energy
efficiency. This dependency highlights a critical balance between technological needs and responsible
environmental stewardship. In 2024, we consumed a total of approximately 8.1 billion gallons (31 billion liters
or 31 million cubic meters) of water across our data centers
these centers do use combined cycle power plants as a power source, which do use water. its not the equipment itself that requires the water, but the power plant. However there are systems now adays that minimize the use of water, that recycle the water and produce solid waste instead.
its not the "lack" of power generation, its that datacenters have their own private power sources, which do require water, but that water is not "consumed" as the general public thinks. Its cycled through multiple times. either way something is amiss with the general public sentiment vs reality. I dont know which is correct.
This is a misconception. The initial data centers for AI were open loop systems because that was more efficient but the latest chips are so hot that open loop can't cool them. Elon Musk's Collosus Center is a hybrid of both. Microsoft and Oracle both have plans for massive data centers that are closed loop. Meta has moved to hybrid systems. No new data center being built is open loop only.
Honestly, boomers are just idiotic nimbys who watched something on CNN and then got mad and it's sad to see many people on here falling for it also.
The issue is "who pays for it". As long as these companies pay for the water rather than the public subsidizing it for them then it's all good.
I literally have been to dozens of datacenters. They're all the fucking same. Go find a big corporation with datacenters, I've been on their sites. They're all the same.
They secretly accumulate the land using shell companies. It's really sneaky. Lots of people protesting the data centers don't even know who to sue. The llc is just a realty broker and the names of data center acquirer is secret up to and past approvals permits etc