Europeans are the true children of Israel. Fake ashkenazis are Edomites.
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
46 comments:
6
4 days ago
6 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+6Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
0
2 days ago
0 points
(+0
/
-0
)
No: Ashkeanzi aren't Edomites either. They just joined the Edomites around 600 AD. Neither the Ashkenazi/Khazarians or Edomites are Israelites/Hebrews. Only Whites are.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
The Judeans the Edomites the Ammonites and Moabites were all Semitic peoples... its not really race mixing...
Sand niggers basically
"No Ammonite or Moabite or any of their descendants may enter the assembly of the LORD, not even in the tenth generation." (Deuteronomy 23:3)
I'm not sure if Ammonites and Moabites are Adamic or not - they most certainly don't exist unmixed today, but Edomites are not Semitic. They're race-mixed with Canaanites and Kenites - mixed with fallen angels, so yes, it's race-mixing.
I'm not sure if Ammonites and Moabites are Adamic or not - they most certainly don't exist unmixed today, but Edomites are not Semitic. They're race-mixed with Canaanites and Kenites - mixed with fallen angels, so yes, it's race-mixing.
Unhinged... check the dna and youll see the ancient Isrealites are generically the same as Cannanites
Unhinged is trusting jewish dna testing and accepting that abhorrent claim you made. We're the only race that fulfilled the OT prophecies. "100 Proofs the Israelites were White"
Wait until people start asking for solid scientific proof of a molecular substance called DNA as a mechanism of heredity.
We don't have dna samples of people from ancient times, so the point is moot. The people in certain places aren't the same stock from 2000 years ago. Need I go on?
i mean, we have a Pretty Good idea of stuff at that level. the complexity of the way every hormone in our body acts and interacts is beyond us and the brain is a mystery, but we can figure out that DNA exists and affects stuff and is probably the largest part if not basically the only part of why your kids look like you.
if you want to fight science on dogma, try the quantum field and the theories of everything they pop out by the dozen. it's basically a trillion dollar memefest on who can maths the hardest over things that are all but unprovable. remember when we "discovered" the higgs boson (funny how everything's named after the people studying the stuff, huh?)? well, discovering it doesn't mean we got it under a microscope and saw it creating gravity or whatever like we can do with bacteria (which are even visible to the naked eye at their largest, fun fact), it means that over a zillion runs of collisions, a certain area of electric sensors got excited 0.001% more than random noise, which according to Insert Theory of Everything Here means that that was actually a byproduct of a byproduct of something that only has some 0.2135% chance of even happening (sometimes the higgs boson doesn't exist! dunno why but i promise!) which means that a Higgs Boson was there at some point, pinky promise, and totally gave gravity to everything around it in the 0.00000001 picoseconds it existed. trust me, bro.
shit's ridiculous. there's even articles written by nerds on the I Want My Name On That Particle wars they keep having amongst themselves. it's by far the least believable of all science, and second only to maybe psychology on how many jews run it... go figure.
if you want to fight science on dogma, try the quantum field and the theories of everything they pop out by the dozen. it's basically a trillion dollar memefest on who can maths the hardest over things that are all but unprovable. remember when we "discovered" the higgs boson (funny how everything's named after the people studying the stuff, huh?)? well, discovering it doesn't mean we got it under a microscope and saw it creating gravity or whatever like we can do with bacteria (which are even visible to the naked eye at their largest, fun fact), it means that over a zillion runs of collisions, a certain area of electric sensors got excited 0.001% more than random noise, which according to Insert Theory of Everything Here means that that was actually a byproduct of a byproduct of something that only has some 0.2135% chance of even happening (sometimes the higgs boson doesn't exist! dunno why but i promise!) which means that a Higgs Boson was there at some point, pinky promise, and totally gave gravity to everything around it in the 0.00000001 picoseconds it existed. trust me, bro.
shit's ridiculous. there's even articles written by nerds on the I Want My Name On That Particle wars they keep having amongst themselves. it's by far the least believable of all science, and second only to maybe psychology on how many jews run it... go figure.
Imagine being this retarded when actually facts are available to back up old and new testament theology.
You might brush up on Origen of Alexandria, then St. John Cassian and St. Augustine.
You might brush up on Origen of Alexandria, then St. John Cassian and St. Augustine.
None of you know what the fuck you're talking about. You're theorizing about a few VERY small populations who lived literally thousands of years ago. No one has any real idea who they were, where they came from, who they were related to, or anything else that might give us some idea of their identities. Because they lived in close proximity, there was a fair amount of intermarriage and cultural contact. But keep in mind that this area was and is a very small area that was dominated by vast empires, including the Greeks, the Egyptians, the Persians, and the Assyrians and Babylonians.
You people read a book by some idiot with an agenda who's dumber than you and you think you have it all figured out. Give it a rest. We don't know, and no one will ever know. History is like that. We're never going to know what really happened, and making shit up doesn't help. It certainly doesn't answer any questions.
You people read a book by some idiot with an agenda who's dumber than you and you think you have it all figured out. Give it a rest. We don't know, and no one will ever know. History is like that. We're never going to know what really happened, and making shit up doesn't help. It certainly doesn't answer any questions.
"No one has any idea" Meanwhile:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associatoncovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html\
https://youtu.be/RviaOEItQPs\
https://youtu.be/-_pBwpOoLo0\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associatoncovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html\
https://youtu.be/RviaOEItQPs\
https://youtu.be/-_pBwpOoLo0\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
I reject your jewish "sources" because they are biased and have an agenda, like all jews do. The Jewish Encyclopedia? The Jewish Almanac? Encyclopedia Judaica? C'mon. And nearly all of this is memes.
You also ignored the fact that the Hebrew scriptures is fucking mythology, with a little distorted and grossly inaccurate history thrown in. None of the people described in the first ten books of the Hebrew scriptures ever existed, and those stories are based on things the original inhabitants of that area learned either from traders and merchants from other places like Egypt, Persia, or Assyria, or they learned while in captivity in Babylon. The latter we at least know is a fact.
The Old Testament is not history. It is mythology.
You also ignored the fact that the Hebrew scriptures is fucking mythology, with a little distorted and grossly inaccurate history thrown in. None of the people described in the first ten books of the Hebrew scriptures ever existed, and those stories are based on things the original inhabitants of that area learned either from traders and merchants from other places like Egypt, Persia, or Assyria, or they learned while in captivity in Babylon. The latter we at least know is a fact.
The Old Testament is not history. It is mythology.
We literally have all of this written into stone in three separate languages that perfectly capture, explain, and cross reference everything that happened in the New Testament and today, complete with 500+ primary and secondary sources. We literally have more factual, undeniable, proven evidence that the Old Testament's events are true than we do of the Roman Empire ever existing, or even the founding of the United States. The only reason you think "Hebrew" isn't White or the Old Testament is "mythology" is because you're a fucking retard who blindly believes what jews tell you to believe because you're too retarded to study scholastic history your self. The oldest tree in the world isn't even 5000 years old. Just think about that for one second. How much longer are you going to be a coincidence theorist just because jews said so?
>Damn it, believe the way I do and accept my spurious and largely imaginary sources, or I'm going to insult you some more! You're not allowed to do your own thinking! I'm right because I said so!!!
Right. Oh, and where is this "written into stone"? I'd like to know more about that, preferably citing an actual book that's not written by jews. Because I don't believe you.
Right. Oh, and where is this "written into stone"? I'd like to know more about that, preferably citing an actual book that's not written by jews. Because I don't believe you.
"Imaginary sources despite hundreds of authors across thousands of years and countries hundreds of thousands of miles apart from each other all saying the exact same thing in multiple languages and predicting everything exactly that has happened in the future perfectly despite never having contact with each other"\
Assyrian tablets and Behistun rock are two such examples. Also, the Bible wasn't written by jews, it was written by White men, YOUR ancestors. The only reason you believe it was written by jews is because jews told you so.
Assyrian tablets and Behistun rock are two such examples. Also, the Bible wasn't written by jews, it was written by White men, YOUR ancestors. The only reason you believe it was written by jews is because jews told you so.
Josephus had Edomite friends, he was like a modern day conservitard. He had no axe to grind.
Josephus was a jew. He definitely had a bias in his history.
Judea was comprised of Judahites - they're Israelites. Judea started importing Edomites 130 years before Christ was born - they are descended from fallen angels. They are not Israelites, not even Adamites. They are the ones Christ rejected because they were never His sheep to begin with.
It's the same as us importing jeets and niggers - they aren't our race.
Josephus was an Israelite, but was friendly to these Edomites, the same as a modern conservitard. I'm not sure I can put it more simply. Do you understand?
It's the same as us importing jeets and niggers - they aren't our race.
Josephus was an Israelite, but was friendly to these Edomites, the same as a modern conservitard. I'm not sure I can put it more simply. Do you understand?
>they are descended from fallen angels
Do I understand? Not even remotely. Not if you're going to spout religious nonsense as if it were history. Get it straight: The jewish bible is not history. It's self-serving mythology written by jews, for jews.
And there were many, many more kinds of people living in Palestine at the beginning of the first millennium, not just "Judahites". And it was, and is, a very small piece of geography in comparison with its neighbors and relatively unimportant in history. The only reason anyone is interested is because of that book of mythology you people keep treating as if it were history.
Do I understand? Not even remotely. Not if you're going to spout religious nonsense as if it were history. Get it straight: The jewish bible is not history. It's self-serving mythology written by jews, for jews.
And there were many, many more kinds of people living in Palestine at the beginning of the first millennium, not just "Judahites". And it was, and is, a very small piece of geography in comparison with its neighbors and relatively unimportant in history. The only reason anyone is interested is because of that book of mythology you people keep treating as if it were history.
Indumeans are Hindus.
Using AI for quick synopsis:
Yes, linguistically and historically, they come from the exact same root. The Greeks referred to the river Indus and the lands to its east as Indos. This Greek word eventually evolved into the terms "Indu," "India," and "Hindu" that we use today.
The transition between these terms makes perfect sense when you follow the linguistics:
Sanskrit Root: The name originates from the ancient Sanskrit word Sindhu, which was the local name for the Indus River.
Persian Shift: In Old Persian, the "S" sound shifted to an "H" sound. Therefore, the Persians pronounced the word Sindhu as Hindu.
Greek Adoption: When the Greeks (such as those traveling with Alexander the Great) adopted the Persian term into their language, they dropped the "H" sound and added their own suffix, referring to the region as Indos (Ἰνδοί) and the people as Indoi.
Through these historical and linguistic adaptations, both the Greeks and the ancient Persians used names meaning "Indu/Hindu" simply to designate the land and people associated with the Indus River, rather than specifically naming a religion.
Using AI for quick synopsis:
Yes, linguistically and historically, they come from the exact same root. The Greeks referred to the river Indus and the lands to its east as Indos. This Greek word eventually evolved into the terms "Indu," "India," and "Hindu" that we use today.
The transition between these terms makes perfect sense when you follow the linguistics:
Sanskrit Root: The name originates from the ancient Sanskrit word Sindhu, which was the local name for the Indus River.
Persian Shift: In Old Persian, the "S" sound shifted to an "H" sound. Therefore, the Persians pronounced the word Sindhu as Hindu.
Greek Adoption: When the Greeks (such as those traveling with Alexander the Great) adopted the Persian term into their language, they dropped the "H" sound and added their own suffix, referring to the region as Indos (Ἰνδοί) and the people as Indoi.
Through these historical and linguistic adaptations, both the Greeks and the ancient Persians used names meaning "Indu/Hindu" simply to designate the land and people associated with the Indus River, rather than specifically naming a religion.
Idumeans are Edomites.
The Mittani empire, a Hindu army, conquered the land of the Edomites (Syria, Jordan, Iraq) in 1300BC. So, yes, they are a mixed Hindu breed.
But, the Mittani empire left the Hebrews alone. The Hebrews were another Hindu tribe. They did not engage in brother wars.
But, the Mittani empire left the Hebrews alone. The Hebrews were another Hindu tribe. They did not engage in brother wars.
Toast message