Given that he lacks Trump's sort of exceptionalism which has flowed into his political career (e.g. the only president without prior military service or political office; the second president to win two non-consecutive terms), I doubt that Vance will win in 2028.
Remember that, were it not for Trump, Hilary would have beaten Jeb Bush in 2016. Trump, unlike Jeb, seems to be able to defy the usual American political patterns. Nevertheless, Vance seems to lack that, and will probably lose to Newsom or Kamala in 2028. (Kamala plans to re-run, but since Americans dislike betting on a losing horse and have only ever re-ran a few losing candidates [e.g. William Jennings Bryan, Adlai Stevenson], American political history suggests that Kamala won't get the Democratic nomination.)
As for Newsom, his term as California Governor expires in January 2027, and he's term-limited. My guess is that he'll be talked into running for president - presuming, of course, that he doesn't already intend on it - and will then go on to beat Vance.
A lot of this depends on the mid-terms (if the Democrats win the mid-terms, even slightly, you can almost rest assured that they'll win the presidency).
> Democrat
He's also totally immersed in Indian culture and still doesn't get along with his blood relations even after his supposed conservative turn. How someone with obvious out-group preference is supposed to lead 'conservatism', which is supposed to be in-group preferenced, is anybody's guess.
Then again, I suppose that jeets *are* his in-group by this point, anyway, the honourary street shitter. He should go and be conservative in the Bharatiya Janata Party instead of remaining in America.
Remember that, were it not for Trump, Hilary would have beaten Jeb Bush in 2016. Trump, unlike Jeb, seems to be able to defy the usual American political patterns. Nevertheless, Vance seems to lack that, and will probably lose to Newsom or Kamala in 2028. (Kamala plans to re-run, but since Americans dislike betting on a losing horse and have only ever re-ran a few losing candidates [e.g. William Jennings Bryan, Adlai Stevenson], American political history suggests that Kamala won't get the Democratic nomination.)
As for Newsom, his term as California Governor expires in January 2027, and he's term-limited. My guess is that he'll be talked into running for president - presuming, of course, that he doesn't already intend on it - and will then go on to beat Vance.
A lot of this depends on the mid-terms (if the Democrats win the mid-terms, even slightly, you can almost rest assured that they'll win the presidency).
> Democrat
He's also totally immersed in Indian culture and still doesn't get along with his blood relations even after his supposed conservative turn. How someone with obvious out-group preference is supposed to lead 'conservatism', which is supposed to be in-group preferenced, is anybody's guess.
Then again, I suppose that jeets *are* his in-group by this point, anyway, the honourary street shitter. He should go and be conservative in the Bharatiya Janata Party instead of remaining in America.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed