9 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
They are true goyim. They would murder their own mothers if the jew demands it. I have no idea why they stuck to Trump and conservatism at all, it's more like a team sport for them. If Trump says suck tranny cock for 'Murica they'd be the first to line up to do it. Zero principles.
7 hours ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
> ... it's more like a team sport for them.
Bingo! One week Trump is talking about landing troops in the middle of Iran to build an airstrip, bring in excavation equipment, and extract the uranium that's underground. After spitballing that insane idea out loud, some actual adults told him how stupid it was and he now says *"That’s so far underground, I don’t care about that stuff."* Direct quote!
Yeah, well, "that stuff" was the whole reason for justifying this invasion, was it not? No, excuse me -- it was to "liberate" the protestors of Iran. *"We are not your enemy; we are your greatest ally in the fight for a free and prosperous Iran,"* Trump said. That was right before he bombed a school full of children and now rants about bombing them all *"back to the Stone Ages, where they belong."*
The guy was bragging *"They have no anti-aircraft protection. They have no nothing,"* five minutes before four aircraft got shot up. It's all a huge circus and his clowns have nothing but cheap insults when they aren't cooking up weird theories for Trump's illusive and unrealized "genius." But really, Trump should be impeached for uttering the words *"They have no nothing."* This clown is (allegedly) an Ivy League graduate, by the way.
> This clown is (allegedly) an Ivy League graduate, by the way.
I am fascinated by how many people who come from universities are utterly dumb, saying and doing things that are incomprehensible. No, not 4D chess, but dishing out utter nonsense which people dig up like it's some kind of revelation.
People are so dazzled by these people who are supposed to be "intellectuals", but are just idiots with a different accent. My biggest grudge are people like those - who pretend to be smart, who are supposed to be smart, but aren't.
I'd really like to humiliate them publicly, maybe in debate settings. I wouldn't hold back either, when I perceive that they make some stupid argument, don't know something they should know, do emotional appeals or whatever, I'd go for their throat.
I'd also ask elaborate questions where answering them or not leads to utter humiliation. "Did you know jews believe that non-jews, meaning you and me, are subhuman slave cattle?" If he says that's not true, I ask him to entertain the hypothetical, what if it were true. If necessary I'd play the hypothetical with Christianity and answer the question. If he plays along, I'd tell him that this hypothetical isn't fictional, but actual reality. If he rejects it, I ask him if he considers rabbi whatever Schmuhli to be a liar, because he said it. I'd be quite amazed how little he thinks of jews that he doesn't trust them. If he plays "I won't even consider that!", I'd ask him why. Is it because he knows it is true? Is it because he doesn't want to admit it in front of an audience? Is it because he fears the humiliation in this conversation because he is caught in a web he cannot escape?
I may even ask "do you know what sophistry is"? Just to let them call themselves out, or let me call them out by definition. Or "How comes you didn't know this? You said you are highly educated, but simple facts like this eluded you? Did you base all your opinions on the brainwash imposed upon you?"
I wouldn't accept neutral, wishy-washy outcomes, I'd go for utter destruction, for absolute humiliation. I wouldn't hold back and be satisfied with "let the conversation speak for itself" bullshit.
"So you came here, without preparation, suffering loss and humiliation against a random uneducated pleb. So is everyone from Harvard like you, an idiot?"
Bingo! One week Trump is talking about landing troops in the middle of Iran to build an airstrip, bring in excavation equipment, and extract the uranium that's underground. After spitballing that insane idea out loud, some actual adults told him how stupid it was and he now says *"That’s so far underground, I don’t care about that stuff."* Direct quote!
Yeah, well, "that stuff" was the whole reason for justifying this invasion, was it not? No, excuse me -- it was to "liberate" the protestors of Iran. *"We are not your enemy; we are your greatest ally in the fight for a free and prosperous Iran,"* Trump said. That was right before he bombed a school full of children and now rants about bombing them all *"back to the Stone Ages, where they belong."*
The guy was bragging *"They have no anti-aircraft protection. They have no nothing,"* five minutes before four aircraft got shot up. It's all a huge circus and his clowns have nothing but cheap insults when they aren't cooking up weird theories for Trump's illusive and unrealized "genius." But really, Trump should be impeached for uttering the words *"They have no nothing."* This clown is (allegedly) an Ivy League graduate, by the way.
I am fascinated by how many people who come from universities are utterly dumb, saying and doing things that are incomprehensible. No, not 4D chess, but dishing out utter nonsense which people dig up like it's some kind of revelation.
People are so dazzled by these people who are supposed to be "intellectuals", but are just idiots with a different accent. My biggest grudge are people like those - who pretend to be smart, who are supposed to be smart, but aren't.
I'd really like to humiliate them publicly, maybe in debate settings. I wouldn't hold back either, when I perceive that they make some stupid argument, don't know something they should know, do emotional appeals or whatever, I'd go for their throat.
I'd also ask elaborate questions where answering them or not leads to utter humiliation. "Did you know jews believe that non-jews, meaning you and me, are subhuman slave cattle?" If he says that's not true, I ask him to entertain the hypothetical, what if it were true. If necessary I'd play the hypothetical with Christianity and answer the question. If he plays along, I'd tell him that this hypothetical isn't fictional, but actual reality. If he rejects it, I ask him if he considers rabbi whatever Schmuhli to be a liar, because he said it. I'd be quite amazed how little he thinks of jews that he doesn't trust them. If he plays "I won't even consider that!", I'd ask him why. Is it because he knows it is true? Is it because he doesn't want to admit it in front of an audience? Is it because he fears the humiliation in this conversation because he is caught in a web he cannot escape?
I may even ask "do you know what sophistry is"? Just to let them call themselves out, or let me call them out by definition. Or "How comes you didn't know this? You said you are highly educated, but simple facts like this eluded you? Did you base all your opinions on the brainwash imposed upon you?"
I wouldn't accept neutral, wishy-washy outcomes, I'd go for utter destruction, for absolute humiliation. I wouldn't hold back and be satisfied with "let the conversation speak for itself" bullshit.
"So you came here, without preparation, suffering loss and humiliation against a random uneducated pleb. So is everyone from Harvard like you, an idiot?"