"I've Read the Bible And it Made Me an Atheist"
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
What are you basing this on?
> Correct, though there was a lot of jewish perversion from their exposure to the jews (edomitse).
Fair answer.
> ... He repeats this twice more in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9.
Interesting take, but ultimately a fair answer.
> Correct, it was to prevent our women from race mixing with non-Whites.
If that were correct, why is this so heavily rejected by members of this community, for example?
> By refusing to accept this, you think all of those blessings and prophesies applied to jews but God was lying and wrong because He "chose the wrong people" and it's only a massive coincidence Whites happened to fulfill them all.
No. You're not taking on board what I'm saying, you keep drawing the lines at a different point. I've said Judah is the first jew, not Jacob. The blessing follows Joseph and his line disappears as a lost tribe, with his children "fruitful"' & "forgetful."
> left it for Europe and America, some after Exodus like the tribes of Dan, Levi and Zebulon who became the Greeks, Romans, Celts, Norse ect.
If I am understanding correctly, you believe the blessing passed to all of Jacob's children, and unnamed descendants left to form/join those peoples? What verses lead to this conclusion?
> the rest after Christ's resurrection through the Caucasus mountains, just as the Assyrian tablets and Behistun rock literally prove in three separate languages.
I'm unfamiliar, please provide additional information so I may investigate.
Thank you.
Genesis 6 and Enoch. God made White man. Whites don't have non-White babies. Therefore, God didn't make non-Whites.
>If that were correct, why is this so heavily rejected by members of this community, for example?
Because many members of this community are jewed retards that don't know anything about anything and get all their information from online memes without ever actually researching anything outside first page of joogle or a YouTube video. Jews successfully subverted Christianity in 1500s by allowing themselves and non-Whites into the Church, then established more power after using Napoleon to destroy Christian Nobility in the 1700s where he then emancipated them and allowed them set up central banking, then switched identities in 1860 when they started calling themselves the Israelites/Hebrews and Whites Edom ultimately, then finally using Scofield to brainwash all modern boomers in late 1800s/early 1900s to think jews are somehow "God's chosen people" and get the modern state of Israel.
>No. You're not taking on board what I'm saying, you keep drawing the lines at a different point. I've said Judah is the first jew, not Jacob. The blessing follows Joseph and his line disappears as a lost tribe, with his children "fruitful"' & "forgetful."
No, you said Judas was the first jew. Judah was one of Jacob-Israel's 12 sons. Jews themselves know that all the other tribes are included, so the word "jew" doesn't come from "Judah" but "Judea" which is what most of Israel was called towards the end. Even more important is that the Bible never even said the word "jew," that's a modern mistranslation from the word Ἰουδαῖος which means Judean. A dog born in a stable isn't a horse, a nigger born in Europe isn't European, a White born in China isn't Chinese, therefore a jew (edomite) born in Judea (Israel) isn't Judean (Israelite). So you think it's just a coincidence that Whites still happened to fulfill every single prophesy, blessing and curse made to Israel through "colonization" and very few Whites today remember they're Israel and not jews?
>If I am understanding correctly, you believe the blessing passed to all of Jacob's children, and unnamed descendants left to form/join those peoples? What verses lead to this conclusion?
Have you read Deuteronomy? My very own family name and heraldry comes from Deuteronomy 33:17. Here, watch this: https://youtu.be/0BtRFOO03z8
>I'm unfamiliar, please provide additional information so I may investigate.
I already did, but here it is again:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associatoncovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
https://freepages.rootsweb.com/~royalancestors/genealogy/names/j/joseph_anna.html\
https://youtu.be/RviaOEItQPs\
https://youtu.be/-_pBwpOoLo0\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
So I did. That was a typo I missed.
Thank you for comprehensively taking the time. Your arguments are consistent enough that I'll start making my way through the sources.