New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
This is a question that really woke me up several years back.

People call "us" conservatives. But what are we supposed to be conserving?

I don't want to conserve much from modern society. I want to get rid of most of the trash that has accumulated in our culture. But I don't want to go back in time and try to recreate history.

What we see in history is a lot of bad ideas that didn't work. The good stuff sticks around despite modernity. Keep that stuff. Get rid of modernity.

What is modernity? It is the idea that men are components of a machine, fungible. One man on the front lines is as good as any other man. One man working in a factory is as good as any other man.

Modernity says that we should buy cheap things because we need to make money at all costs. OK, I'm fine with optimizing how I spend my money, but "at all costs"? There are some things I'm not willing to compromise on, some things I WANT to spend money on, some things that makes the entire concept of having money at all appealing.

I'll list a few things that I actually want:

* Cotton clothing
* Nice, hand-made high-protein, high-animal fat meals.
* Comfortable chairs
* Shoes that actually fit my feet and don't feel like their soles are made of styrofoam
* Time each day to walk my pasture and look at my animals
* Music and art that enlightens my soul

And I can go on and on with thing that actually matter.

But at the top of the list is the concept of family. Both the nuclear family, with a father and a mother and as many kids as is physically possible to procreate, as well as cousins, aunts, uncles, grandparents, and everyone else.

The "new society" I envision looks something like this.

Adults are married. All of them. Adults who aren't married are a strange curiosity. Married adults have plenty of kids. Older married adults spend most of their time with their grandkids and helping out their adult kids. The primary form of recreation is spent in their family doing family activities, things like cookouts, campouts, hiking, sports, etc...

Young girls are trained from birth to be mothers. As they mature they are taught vital life skills such as how to manage a family, how to prepare wholesome foods, how to teach kids, etc... When they mature they are married.

Young boys are trained from birth to be fathers. They are taught how to fight, how to grow food, how to deal with the outside world, and valuable economic skills that keep food on the table and chores done. When they mature, as soon as they are able to start their own family (and men take longer to mature than women) they are married. They shouldn't have to go into debt to get property and build a house. The previous generation should make sure that young men are able to secure land and housing for their families.

No one has a "job". At least not in the modern sense of the word. Everyone owns things that make food and clothing and the wealth that the world means. While no one family can do everything, each family has something they are good at doing, and they pass those skills down to their kids.

Of all the skills, the most fundamental are not delegated as much. Everyone has a small farm, and everyone grows at least some of their own food. They all learn how to sew their own clothing, fix their own roofs, etc.. The reason for this is simple: survival and redundancy.

No one is a spectator, trying to be entertained. We entertain ourselves and we entertain each other. Sports, dancing, music, etc... are all activities where there are no bleachers and no cameras. "Going to a game" means you are going to participate in that game in some role.

The key concept of my vision of the future is simply getting rid of "modernity" and going back to a previous mentality where humans are the most important thing in the universe, and every human is distinct and individual and no one person can replace another. And in order to make that happen, we need to build millions of tiny communities called families where individuals are free to be individual but still responsible for their actions.
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 day ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 2 children
The name doesn't make any sense since conservatives haven't conserved anything. I usually describe myself as so right-wing, I'd make liberals cry out for Hitler if I ever obtained power.
goodnightiryna on scored.co
1 day ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 2 children
The left-right axis isn't right for most of us. I know most people would consider me hard right, in reality, I'm a center left, White Christian Nationalist.

Fuck social programs for blacks or bankers, fuck shit skin migration, etc... that all look hard right.

Low IQ whites? A government program to help them get jobs sweeping factory floors, picking up litter in parks and beaches? Absolutely.
BlippiIsAPedo on scored.co
1 day ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
X-Y plane is for elementary school people. Remember that.
CaptainTrouble on scored.co
1 day ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
Yeah, part of the issues is that once you're racist and/or a few other things then the leftists consider you all the same even though there's still significant differences.

But "conservative" these days basically just means liberal but not quite as ridiculously liberal. They've conserved nothing. Most conservatives are fine with women voting and in politics. Conserved what exactly? Nothing.
MelatoninDreams on scored.co
3 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I think Hitler was kind of unique. He's often described as ultra-conservative, but that would be a more accurate description of the Prussian nobility that at time opposed and at times supported him. Hitler himself had a unique vision that combined tradition and futurism.
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
1 day ago 9 points (+0 / -0 / +9Score on mirror ) 1 child
>There are some things I'm not willing to compromise on, some things I WANT to spend money on, some things that makes the entire concept of having money at all appealing.

Isn't it funny how, as we save *so* much money compared to the last generation, that there isn't anything worth buying any more?

Clothes and shoes wear out in a few years, tech becomes "obselete" in the same amount of time, bread and circuses are stale and gay; the only thing worth buying are necessities and they increasingly fail to do the job. Even tools are of so low quality that you'd almost be better off renting them.

I've got a ton of savings partly because I have nothing to spend on. So I just stop working.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 day ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror )
My God, we all think very similarly. It’s insane how you just described a convo I had with my uncle the other day. He agreed. I just wish ammo wasn’t so damn expensive, because I do still enjoy shooting with the right group of frens. I find myself dry flirting more than I use to now.
Yashimata on scored.co
1 day ago 3 points (+0 / -0 / +3Score on mirror )
I thought about this a while back. Conservative is wrong; it doesn't conserve anything. So is traditionalist; whose traditions do you want to follow? Grandparents? Great grandparents? Further? And you just get knee-jerk reactions from NPCs.

The answer I eventually came to was "correctivism". I don't think it's a thing that actually exists, but I imagine it to be the "fuck, go back" political option.
BlackPillBot on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
The simplest way I can describe how I live my life now to the average normy, and/or NPC is prison rules before anything else. I’ve had this discussion numerous times over the last ten years with frens, and they all tend to agree especially under our current occupation, and circumstances. The only caveat I’d make is to make it be known that actual prisoners are in many ways more free than we currently are.
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
You conserve the status quo.

Doesn't matter what it is, or if it changes. You *coonserve* it, goddammit.

> "Marriage is between a man and a woman! I absolutely oppose the legalization of fags being wed!"

*Assmuncher unions are now legal*

> "Marriage is between two individuals who love each other! I absolutely oppose any bigotry directed towards muh based faggerinos! Uh, but I still oppose *child marriage...*"

*Meanwhile, a jew's crooked grin flashes in the dark of a dimly lit government office. In his hands, he shuffles the papers of the upcoming **Minor Attracted Persons Protection Act** like a deck of cards.*
TheMafia on scored.co
1 day ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
Conserve freedom and liberty.

Destroy the federal government.

It's actually pretty simple.

Stop taking my taxes and then telling me I'm wrong just for existing and that I have to fundamentally change my life to suit some jewish agenda.
steele2 on scored.co
14 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
>But what are we supposed to be conserving?

Classic Conservatism is about conserving culture.

In our case, preserving our White Christian culture and values.
Trasheconomy on scored.co
12 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Hell yes brother. That’s what this board is about. Conceptualizing this world, and realizing it. It’s a 100 year project, we may never see it reached. But we are the start of something great
Toast message