He might actually be dead boys…
(media.scored.co)
The AI slop is one thing… how do you explain this?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
15 comments:
Okay but he's just gonna get replaced by someone worse since we're not taking power from the jews, so who cares?
Jews make their existence off of puppeteering. And they puppeteer each other as much as (or even more than) goyim. Israel has the same problem that the US does in that no matter who gets elected and put into office, they follow the *exact* same program (on foreign policy matters in particular).
David Ben Gurion: ostensibly a leftist. Was part of left wing zionism for his entire life. Still turned Israel into a far right state aligned with the US (eventually controlling it) instead of the eastern bloc.
Levi Eshkol: founder of the labor party. Still functionally far right when in office.
Ariel Sharon: was Netanyahu's "rival" on the center. Still did the same shit in regards to Iran that bibi is doing. And everything else. There has been functionally no difference between any Israeli leader.
Etc
This implies that the PMs of Israel are also bought and paid for by another entity that is more powerful than them, and then after one degree of separation the Israeli PMs control US presidents and so on. I get that jews are monolithic, but there was once a plurality of interpretations of zionism. Israeli PMs would follow one version of zionism before taking office and then enact the same one we've been getting for 80 years now.
The answer: Israel's owners aren't from 1948 but are rather the same owners that Israel has had since 1917 when the British gave them the land. These owners are the rothschilds. It's just that Israel became nominally independent in 1948, every PM that Israel has had since then has been enforcing the law of the people who had already owned it 30 years prior to its actual founding, who created and still follow the version of zionism that every single Israeli leader has fallen in line with.
Edit for more clarity: This is called "revisionist zionism", the more radical and violent variant of zionism that advocates for the jews to take the lands of greater Israel by force and religious-military action. This is the line of zionism that Israel has been following for years. Every variant of zionism agrees on creating a nebulous hub for jews to carry out their will against the world, but they differ very much in their methods. Zionism is the jewish variant of fascism (and I mean this in a legitimate way. I acknowledge that zionism is beneficial to the jews but anathema to the goyim, similar to fascism in reverse). There's like 50 versions of fascism that agree on roughly the same thing but with different methods to achieve it, there's also a shit ton of different versions of zionism. But much like how National socialism, classical fascism, and falangism are very different ideologies, labor zionism, revisionist zionism, reform zionism, etc are all very different from each other.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
David Ben Gurion: ostensibly a leftist. Was part of left wing zionism for his entire life. Still turned Israel into a far right state aligned with the US (eventually controlling it) instead of the eastern bloc.
Levi Eshkol: founder of the labor party. Still functionally far right when in office.
Ariel Sharon: was Netanyahu's "rival" on the center. Still did the same shit in regards to Iran that bibi is doing. And everything else. There has been functionally no difference between any Israeli leader.
Etc
This implies that the PMs of Israel are also bought and paid for by another entity that is more powerful than them, and then after one degree of separation the Israeli PMs control US presidents and so on. I get that jews are monolithic, but there was once a plurality of interpretations of zionism. Israeli PMs would follow one version of zionism before taking office and then enact the same one we've been getting for 80 years now.
The answer: Israel's owners aren't from 1948 but are rather the same owners that Israel has had since 1917 when the British gave them the land. These owners are the rothschilds. It's just that Israel became nominally independent in 1948, every PM that Israel has had since then has been enforcing the law of the people who had already owned it 30 years prior to its actual founding, who created and still follow the version of zionism that every single Israeli leader has fallen in line with.
Edit for more clarity: This is called "revisionist zionism", the more radical and violent variant of zionism that advocates for the jews to take the lands of greater Israel by force and religious-military action. This is the line of zionism that Israel has been following for years. Every variant of zionism agrees on creating a nebulous hub for jews to carry out their will against the world, but they differ very much in their methods. Zionism is the jewish variant of fascism (and I mean this in a legitimate way. I acknowledge that zionism is beneficial to the jews but anathema to the goyim, similar to fascism in reverse). There's like 50 versions of fascism that agree on roughly the same thing but with different methods to achieve it, there's also a shit ton of different versions of zionism. But much like how National socialism, classical fascism, and falangism are very different ideologies, labor zionism, revisionist zionism, reform zionism, etc are all very different from each other.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Is that one of those things that only the ultra orthodox ones practice? I'm not sure that that family is extra religious-- just extra evil.
Toast message
Carrington Event, please save us.