"I don't think there is anything particularly wrong about hitting a woman—although I don't recommend doing it in the same way that you'd hit a man. An openhanded slap is justified—if all other alternatives fail and there has been plenty of warning. If a woman is a bitch, or hysterical, or bloody-minded continually, then I'd do it." - Sean Connery.
Males allow females to get away with certain behavior patterns that would earn a male a severe beating.
Think about it:
A female can easily "borrow" shekels from a male and not pay them back.
A male would probably not give another male shekels and not expect them to be paid back.
A female can exhibit a certain entitled, "over staying ones welcome" type of behavior and males will tolerate it, or give the female endless second chances.
A male who tries to do the same thing would get scolded by his fellow dudes, at the very least.
A female could steal cookies from the cookie jar with little to no consequenses. A male cant.
A foid does not gotta work, just gotta marry some tradcuck who works his arse off and then live with him.
A male would not be allowed to mooch like that.
Why is this?
Because: Females are not used to consequences.
Because society (AKA men) mindlessly worships females.
Meanwhile males are castrated at birth and are then told to "Man up, go wageuck, and die."
Females are simply less likley to recieve any type of disipline than males are.
A problem with MGTOW is that they advocate for "male solidarity" but....
It is the males who worship the foids and oppress their fellow males.
Foids would have NO POWER if it were not for male simps.
Anyway, what do yall think?
BUT: This is supposed to come with the default operating infrastructure of women having severely limited autonomy. Several of your bulletpoints are no problem in a society that has its head on straight. Women *should* stay home and "mooch" off their husbands, so that they are devoting all their energy into tending his household rather than being a wageslave.
The issue is that they now benefit from the same social structure designed to protect them without any of the checks and balances, which turns it into lopsided power that corrupts them. For as we know, women are indeed especially prone to being corrupted and becoming spiritually heinous if they aren't being led by a firm hand. It's the fatherless problem scaled up to a civilizational level.
That being said, I don't agree with the bitter incel faggotry of OP's post. This guy's persistent setiments on women alone are making me wonder if he's a non. Even with how bad things are, "abusing" women is an immoral act, and not something you have to resort to in order to be strong and lead them.
Letting your wife walk over you and blindly beating the shit out of her like a fucking nigger are two extremes of the same failure to manage the female psyche.
Women, however, respond to words in the extreme. They care about social pressure a *lot*. Embarassing a woman publicly hurts her far more than violence. Think about how many women stay in abusive relationships *just* to avoid the "social stigma" of admitting they chose a shitty boyfriend.
If you want to put women in their place, don't bother with violence (which provokes a *physiological* response in any man present that will cause him to defend her, regardless of their relationship), use shame.
Bitch ruined her body because jews told her to
But yeah the reason foids have power is because simps give them that power
And simping is a global disease, no culture (cept the Islamic ones) can overcome it
Um, sorry for my previous degen trolling on conpro.
Thank the jannies for giving me a 110th chance after banning me 109 times, for no reason at all.