You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
2
BreadandWinePilled on scored.co
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)2 children
Accelerationism is literally cheering on the Jews as they continue their agenda to exterminate the White race and the name of Christ, in the vague and delusional hope that this will somehow cause a mass awakening and race war/class war/real Holocaust/etc. Accelerationism is stupid and evil for cheering on this greater evil.
What you accelerationists fail to realize is that a frog normally *WILL* jump out of a pot when the water temp gets too high, but in the experiment you're referring to, the frogs were lobotomized first.
4 days ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It *can* work, it's a risky 50/50 gamble where it either galvanizes the population or it just makes everything worse.
Accelerationism worked incredibly well for mussolini. He advocated for entering the war while he was in the Italian socialist party, specifically to essentially destroy italy and prime it for revolution, and he was kicked out of the party for it. Well, in no uncertain terms he 100% got exactly what he wanted, it was just a different type of revolution than the bolshevik one he initially advocated. And mussolini still got what he wanted even though italy was incidentally part of the winning side because of the hitherto unforseen US involvement (he actively advocated for italy to join the allies instead of the central powers specifically to lose the war in the first place).
I would say that Germany is another case of accelerationism working, but the NSDAP did not exist prior to ww1 and only came about because of the fact the Germany was in dire straits after the war. It was not an actively pursued position by Hitler or Anton Drexler (neither of whom were involved in politics at all at this point), but it was one that mussolini (who had been political since he was a teenager) pushed extremely heavily, and nascent fascism existed as the pro-war and accelerationist leftist party, the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, prior to the actual war.
So, yes, accelerationism can indeed work. However, it *is* a *very* big gamble, and it entirely relies on hoping that people will do something after a disastrous event, which is most definitely not a given at all and there's no way to quantify what will actually happen after an event.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Mussolini was a buffoon. Fascism is literally just Marxism- i.e. a command economy where everybody works for the government- but instead of Jews and their most loyal shabbos goyim running the place, it's whoever happens to pay Mussolini and his goons the most money. Italy got destroyed economically because Mussolini literally cartel-ified the entire economy, handing out whole swaths of the economy to mafia gangsters one industry at a time, starting with the railroads. Fuck Mussolini and fuck fascism. Fascists (both the original ones and the general term) get minor points for naming the Jew (which not all do, incidentally) and nothing else. Fascism is literally just "nationalize everything and it'll all work out!"
The rise of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP is not in any way related to accelerationism. The kikes running the German Communist Party (DKP) and the original ANTIFA got too aggressive with literally beating people to death in the street if they didn't vote for the Reds, driving the public at large towards the NSDAP. The SA only responded in kind to DKP/ANTIFA violence, they never made a policy of escalation, and the NSDAP *CERTAINLY* never made a policy of promoting and encouraging evil kike interests in the name of "muh accelerationism"
This isn't a discussion about mussolinis policies, it's whether or not his advocacy for accelerationism worked, and it most certainly did work tremendously for him and to the chagrin of the PSI. And your criticism of mussolini is mostly economic. His economics were in fact pretty fucking random (started out laissez-faire, ended up state controlled, then matured to corporatism which hitler also copied). The point is that he stopped italy from being turned over to communists. He prevented italy from being destroyed. He built up the Italian nation spirit. He provided a blueprint for hitler to go off of, hitler did not admire mussolini for no reason or out of ignorance. Mussolini was a mixed bag that never quite grew completely out of his own communism, but without the movement that he himself started Europe would be absolutely fucked (the DAP, before hitler who styled himself after mussolini and copied many of the things he did, was an utterly useless organization. It had good theories, but nobody in it ever wanted to accomplish anything. It was more like a big reactionary book club than a movement). The communists would have won in italy, they would have won in germany because the DAP would have probably remained impotent without the mussolini-inspired hitler, the soviet union would have gotten Poland and every country east of Germany, and the revolution would have most likely spread westward of Germany as well.
And I'm not talking about accelerationism after the war. That was very much all well and done at that point. I'm talking about the war itself as a vehicle for acceleration. Which, in the case of Germany, it certainly was in a way. It accelerated the KPD to a position of power and then the NSDAP in turn. The DAP could not advocate for the war as the accelerationist event because the DAP did not exist, obviously they couldn't do this
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Well going slowly sure hasn't worked for the last 80 years, so you can keep cheering on whatever you call this slow boil bud, I'm gonna hope that some normies finally wake up when the draft gets instituted and their precious kiddo has to go get slaughtered for zog
What you accelerationists fail to realize is that a frog normally *WILL* jump out of a pot when the water temp gets too high, but in the experiment you're referring to, the frogs were lobotomized first.
Must I state the obvious?
Accelerationism worked incredibly well for mussolini. He advocated for entering the war while he was in the Italian socialist party, specifically to essentially destroy italy and prime it for revolution, and he was kicked out of the party for it. Well, in no uncertain terms he 100% got exactly what he wanted, it was just a different type of revolution than the bolshevik one he initially advocated. And mussolini still got what he wanted even though italy was incidentally part of the winning side because of the hitherto unforseen US involvement (he actively advocated for italy to join the allies instead of the central powers specifically to lose the war in the first place).
I would say that Germany is another case of accelerationism working, but the NSDAP did not exist prior to ww1 and only came about because of the fact the Germany was in dire straits after the war. It was not an actively pursued position by Hitler or Anton Drexler (neither of whom were involved in politics at all at this point), but it was one that mussolini (who had been political since he was a teenager) pushed extremely heavily, and nascent fascism existed as the pro-war and accelerationist leftist party, the Fasci d'Azione Rivoluzionaria, prior to the actual war.
So, yes, accelerationism can indeed work. However, it *is* a *very* big gamble, and it entirely relies on hoping that people will do something after a disastrous event, which is most definitely not a given at all and there's no way to quantify what will actually happen after an event.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
The rise of Adolf Hitler and the NSDAP is not in any way related to accelerationism. The kikes running the German Communist Party (DKP) and the original ANTIFA got too aggressive with literally beating people to death in the street if they didn't vote for the Reds, driving the public at large towards the NSDAP. The SA only responded in kind to DKP/ANTIFA violence, they never made a policy of escalation, and the NSDAP *CERTAINLY* never made a policy of promoting and encouraging evil kike interests in the name of "muh accelerationism"
And I'm not talking about accelerationism after the war. That was very much all well and done at that point. I'm talking about the war itself as a vehicle for acceleration. Which, in the case of Germany, it certainly was in a way. It accelerated the KPD to a position of power and then the NSDAP in turn. The DAP could not advocate for the war as the accelerationist event because the DAP did not exist, obviously they couldn't do this
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed