Consume Product

Easy to see what they're doing. They have to shift to egalitarian statements because they've spent millennia subverting hierarchies, inequality, and so forth. Hard to say: 'Israel is God's Chosen country, we defend ourselves because all goyim are worthless' when you've successfully conditioned almost the entirety of the goyim to abhor inequality. Consequently, they have to come up with the desperate, pathetic, and weak statement: 'Israel has a right to defend itself.' An egalitarian statement because the assumption is that everybody has said right, and thus that they aren't asking for anything that everyone else supposedly isn't already entitled to.

An obvious parallel is the 'It's okay to be White' slogan in White nationalism. It is obviously an egalitarian statement - similarly desperate, pathetic, and weak, really - but the Judaized parts of the political spectrum (i.e. almost all of it) considered it to be veiled White supremacy rather than a survivalist statement.

The genius of it, of course, was that it showed that racial egalitarianism has become so extreme that it no longer extends to Whites - having been racially othered as permanent oppressors - but, if taken seriously, it's a totally impotent, submissive statement. 'Please give us Affirmative Action once we're a minority, reciprocally extend to us the kind of protected status we extended to you, nons! It's okay to be White, right? Right, guys?' Slowly it settles on the White egalitarians - far too late - that few nons would even agree to that. Personally, I prefer the comparatively inegalitarian statement: 'It's not just okay to be White, it's awesome.'

Likewise, this needs to be considered symmetrically as veiled kike supremacism. No, the State of Israel does not have the right to defend itself. It doesn't have the right to exist. It should not exist. Kikes don't have the right to defend themselves. Kikes do not have the right to exist. Kikes should not exist. 'Israel has a right to exist' is kike supremacist dog-whistling.
 
That is the only way to view this symmetrically, without double standards. Anything short of that is simply a supremacist double standard: we aren't viewing kikes the way they view all of us goyim, which is *exactly* how we need to view them, as worthless and lower than the lowest of animals.

Not that blowing up schools and universities has anything even remotely to do with defending oneself.

The kikes are right only about a very few things. A broken clock is right twice a day. One is that the goyim are stupid. Where they are wrong is that they are also stupid. That is why the Talmud contains obvious falsehoods such as that the mind is located in the *kidneys* rather than in the brain (encephalocentrism) or the heart (cardiocentrism) like everyone else thought. Their 'holy' texts contain such nonsense because they are also stupid. Yes, they are worthless and lower than the lowest of animals.

Look at someone like 'Punch-kun', the baby macaque in Japan. It is obvious that kikes are far lower forms of life than Punch-kun. Lower than Harambe, Moo Deng, and all of the other animals whom the internet has made famous.

Another thing about which kikes are right is ethnocentrism. To beat the kikes, one has to have their level of ethnocentrism. Yes, theirs is a biological hardwiring - when does one termite eat another? - and they will still throw each other under the bus when necessary to save their own hides, but anyone who wants to survive in this shrinking, deeply globalized world needs to find a way to match if not exceed it.

Any decent human being is pleased by the sight of Tel Aviv, that city of sodomites (25%+ LGBT), that capital city of degeneracy, looking like what they've done to Palestine. Burned-out cars, rubble everywhere. Kikes are a controller/manager and mercantile type, they have never been good at warfare, hence their needing Donald Trump to use America as their bulldozer to do all of the heavy lifting.

Israel does not have the right to defend itself.