Consume Product

What do people see in Vance, anyway? He doesn't even have the combination of the kind of messianic, saviouristic, 'larger than life', and con-man properties of Trump. Or his tendency towards being strangely exceptional and unusual; for instance, in being the second American president to win two non-consecutive terms, or in being the only American president with no prior military or political service.

Trump strikes me as a flawed version of the Nietzschean 'Overman' (*Ubermensch*) - very befitting of a flawed, degenerate era dominated by such mediocre, petty 'Last Men' (*Letztermenschen*) in which even the higher (more accurately, less lower) men are grossly flawed. He combines *Ubermensch* (e.g. he's *megalothymotic,* to borrow Fukuyama's Platonic term, in that he chases after awards [like his hope to obtain the Nobel Peace Prize] and praise) and Last Man properties, whereas most men alive today simply have Last Man properties - e.g. disinterested in achieving or excelling at anything, have very limited ambition, vaguely contented merely by entertainment and relative material prosperity.

Vance strikes me as firmly the latter, as well as very out-group preferenced. For instance, he dislikes his blood family, immerses himself in all things Indian, his kids have Indian names, etc. This is not a man who can sustain 'Trumpian populism'.

Then again, I can't think of anyone else in America who is quite like Trump: President 47 naturally will have to be some totally mediocre, easily forgettable Last Man just like 46 (Biden), rather than someone, like Trump, who combines higher and lower properties.

It's actually some of these higher properties that work against him: desirous of awards and recognition from people he thinks matter, kikes like Cohn and the Adelsons were able to impress him very easily - wow, look at how wealthy these 'people' are!, he would have thought - allowing them to turn him into a complete figurehead.

He's an ideal figurehead in so many ways: like Biden, he's old enough that if he stepped out of line and then cohen-cidentally 'died of natural causes', most people would believe it. He's also ideal in that his bloodline (like the Kennedys) is already becoming genetically yiddish, which, again, is perfect: people will think that future Trumps are 'our' elite when they are, in actuality, *their* elite, that is, yid elites. Interbreeding with the goy elites is a strategy that works well for the yids, producing yid elites that are mistaken by the goyim for their own elites. They then think that they are governed by their own people, when they are not.

One thing that is strange about yids is that, despite all this, they hate and fear the man, too paranoid, typically, to see him as anything but Hitler. (Same thing with Leftists, who should dislike him less than they do.) Bagellers don't realize that Trump is probably *the* very best American president they've ever had. Furthermore, Trump is the best president that Israel never had. I don't know why they don't make him Israel's president or Netanyahu's successor as Prime Minister. It's like Trump has serious Stockholm Syndrome: a man so hated by yids should wish for their total extinction, but instead he continues seeking an acceptance that will never actually come. He will always be useful, but, ultimately, just another dumb and filthy goy.

If I recall correctly, Trump even once said that he'd be proud to learn that he had 'Jewish' ancestry. He's a philo-semite par excellence, brain turned to mush by a lifetime around kikes. Thatcher is perhaps his only serious competitor for the 'Philo-semitic goy leader of all time' award.

Will I be glad when he's gone? Absolutely. Yet looking at all of these Last Men (and women) who could potentially replace him - Newsom, AOC, Vance, 'Nikki Haley' - it becomes apparent that nothing good is on the looming horizon insofar as American politics is concerned. One has to look, say, to Australia or Britain, for (slightly) more encouraging events.