Why would that be the same logic? There were no niggers or jews to worry about when the founding fathers sat down to write the Constitution. Jesus specifically said tolerate no non-Whites in your nations, He only came for us. So you're losing yet another argument, hard.
It is *fundamentally* the same logic. When the "one specific moment" of something's history is dealing with the ideals of its founders, then yes, that *is* more significant than whatever comes after it. Or it isn't. Not one or the other when it suits you. Stop reaching for unrelated abstractions like a kike weasel.
Then again, you believe that kike weasels are your ancestors, so I suppose your rhetorical reasoning is on brand.
There's a lot of misconceptions here. Jesus had to die so that He could conquer death from satan the jew for our salvation. You're not Jesus. You're not His Apostles who had to die to serve as permanent proof of His resurrection. You're not an Apostle.\
Jews are not my ancestors, nor yours. They are edomites. So stop trying to jew around the issue and admit Christ is King, and that it is your Christian duty to fight and hate jews and all other non-Whites, faggot.
Who gives a shit what the *founders* of the thing thought? Their thoughts are just a blip in what ultimately became a multiracial society.
Then again, you believe that kike weasels are your ancestors, so I suppose your rhetorical reasoning is on brand.
Jews are not my ancestors, nor yours. They are edomites. So stop trying to jew around the issue and admit Christ is King, and that it is your Christian duty to fight and hate jews and all other non-Whites, faggot.