New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
I simply can't argue against most liberal concepts in an atheistic model

I'm not an atheist, but its low IQ to try and force your religious moral models on to others without evidence, it's not an intelligent behavior

Thus, I don't really have an issue with trannies anymore, I think it is largely a mental illness and obsession, however so is alcoholism, or an autist obsessed with legos

I don't have an issue with suicide either, I don't think it's good, but killing yourself isn't technically immoral either

Nothing is "technically" immoral, so the only objective morality, or the closest thing to it, is not hurting other people to retain a peaceful society

Unless the trannies groom our children, they can't be argued against from a moral standpoint, it's just "gross"

I have genuinely been turned.

Same goes for abortion

In an atheist model: we are simply preventing a future nig criminal or dysgenic person from passing on their genes.

In a religious model: we are ending the incarnation of a soul

We live in a world based on logic. So I adhere to the former now, because I am only here to save myself and possibly my family.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
TallestSkil on scored.co
12 days ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror ) 1 child
>without evidence

We have evidence, though.

>I don't really have an issue with trannies anymore

Bye, child rapist handshake account.

>however so is alcoholism

Bumping your arm against something and feeling a ’need’ to bump your other arm in the same place is a mental illness. And so is mutilating yourself and raping children.

*One of these is objectively worse than the other.*

>the only objective morality, or the closest thing to it, is not hurting other people

Damn, you really are a leftist.

>to retain a peaceful society

You *must* hurt people to retain a peaceful society.

>Unless the trannies groom our children

So… 100% o the time.

>they can't be argued against from a moral standpoint

“It is objectively harmful to the society that a subset of it actively refuses to maintain and uphold its continuation, as well as incurring unnecessary medical costs thereon.”

>I have genuinely been turned.

Into a woman? No, you will never be a woman.

>Same goes for abortion

* “Murdering people is okay as long as you don’t violate the ‘only objective morality’ of ‘not hurting other people’!”* **~ the clinically insane**

>We live in a world based on logic.

Sir, this is ConPro. c/Funny is that way.

>I am only here to save myself and possibly my family.

Except you’re fine with every member of your family either aborting or self-mutilating its own future. So you’re not here to save anyone.
Amerikanerr on scored.co
12 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
so you wouldn't abort a kid with down syndrome or if the baby was black?
GoldenInnosStatue on scored.co
12 days ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror )
if only that was the SOLE reason why so many foids murder their baby and not because they just don't want to be mothers

but to be fair, abortion is less of an issue than the birth of nons and allowing them to murder our people without reprecussions
Toast message