New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
It claims nothing is its own thing but a facet of a singular "everything".

And yet the goal of Buddhism is to exit the "everything" despite being a facet of this "everything".

That is dumb.

"Everything is one thing, nothing has distinct identity, but also blitz your chakras, they're these distinct parts of your distinct entity."

"The more you realize that you aren't anything except a facet of this oneness, the more you can make of yourself."

"You should really, REALLY care about not caring about ANYTHING, and you should REALLY WANT not to WANT anything!"

Buddhism makes no sense.

Mongoloid chink jeet nonsense.

"But the founder of Buddhism was a blue eyed Aryan!"

Yeah, and MAPhommed was White.

Just because someone is White, or even an Aryan, does not mean that their ideas automatically have value.

Anyway, what do y'all think about Buddhism?

Do you agree that it contradicts itself?
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Versus001 on scored.co
12 days ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I am contrarian at times, that is true.

That is a good thing though, lest a forum become an unthinking echo-chamber.

>basic kike behavior

"You are a kike even though you are contrarian when it comes to kike ideas as well."

I have received hundreds of ban messages online, many of which were for "auntie themitism", so it is rather unlikely that I am a "kike".

I think that the key difference between me and a "kike troll" is that I am willing to listen to reason, it is just that internet people are incapable of rational discussion, only spergy insults.

I do not care what political cult someone belongs to, if I see hypocrisy, I will point it out.

I do not care if that is "subversion" or "pilpul" or "gaslighting".
Toast message