It claims nothing is its own thing but a facet of a singular "everything".
And yet the goal of Buddhism is to exit the "everything" despite being a facet of this "everything".
That is dumb.
"Everything is one thing, nothing has distinct identity, but also blitz your chakras, they're these distinct parts of your distinct entity."
"The more you realize that you aren't anything except a facet of this oneness, the more you can make of yourself."
"You should really, REALLY care about not caring about ANYTHING, and you should REALLY WANT not to WANT anything!"
Buddhism makes no sense.
Mongoloid chink jeet nonsense.
"But the founder of Buddhism was a blue eyed Aryan!"
Yeah, and MAPhommed was White.
Just because someone is White, or even an Aryan, does not mean that their ideas automatically have value.
Anyway, what do y'all think about Buddhism?
Do you agree that it contradicts itself?
Lord Grim, why do you keep making new profiles.. Just to show your true jew colors again?
Shit, I do not even believe MAPhommed was White anyway, I think that is dune coon cope.
I was just using him as an example, because even if he was """White""", he was still a bloodthirsty conqueror and a rapist, and thus bad.
Are you serously going to sit there and say that if MAPhommed, the guy who plagarized the talmund to make his own religion, was White, that "his" ideas would have value?
Fuck off.
You argue like a child.
No substance, just insults.
Thanks for proving me right every time.
No. It's that you're shlomo troll who eventually does the same anti-White bullshit, over & over again. I've simply learned not to bother and just point it out.
>Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.
It is not anti-White to point out that even if MAPhommed and Buddha were "White", that it does not change anything.
Their ideas are still not good regardless.
"Anyone I do not like is muh jew."
If you have an actual counterpoint, lay it on me.
Calling me a "muh troll" changes nothing and has zero philisophical tact, which is what I have sadly come to expect from spergs.
Being an annoying weirdo that is a self admitted troll. Who created many alternate profiles when you decided to abandon the odd childish persona of the other ones. Because those got blocked and you need attention.
Always needing to be explained the same false equivalency. Or making some hyper conflation which also happens to be stirring up some anti-White subversion. Or drawing attention to an outlier that is incoherent with something you've misunderstood.
It's odd to me that you behave this way. You seem to enjoy pilpul and gaslighting, basic kike behavior. Therefore, I don't trust your motives and I don't like you. It's that simple.
That is a good thing though, lest a forum become an unthinking echo-chamber.
>basic kike behavior
"You are a kike even though you are contrarian when it comes to kike ideas as well."
I have received hundreds of ban messages online, many of which were for "auntie themitism", so it is rather unlikely that I am a "kike".
I think that the key difference between me and a "kike troll" is that I am willing to listen to reason, it is just that internet people are incapable of rational discussion, only spergy insults.
I do not care what political cult someone belongs to, if I see hypocrisy, I will point it out.
I do not care if that is "subversion" or "pilpul" or "gaslighting".