New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
55
posted 14 hours ago by detransthrowaway on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +55Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-2
genesisSOC on scored.co
11 hours ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror ) 3 children
While this post's heart is in the right place, it's not about "energy out > energy in." The whole concept of "calories" is jewish fake and gay. It's a very retarded notion to believe that every single body somehow generates the exact same amount of ATP from any particular food source, or that the quality of that food source is irrelevant to the amount of energy produced, or all the other specific nuances from each specific food source. The reality is, it doesn't matter how much or how little you exercise if you're surrounded by constant goyslop and other jewish toxins like EMFs, chemtrails and microplastics. A medieval scribe who ate nothing but real food like stonemilled einkorn fresh bread and never lifted anything heavier than some books and didn't exercise more than climbing some stairs once a day had more muscle and was far more healthy and fit than today's "health influencers" on social media that try eating carnivore or keto or paleo or whatever.
70thLike on scored.co
11 hours ago 4 points (+0 / -0 / +4Score on mirror ) 1 child
People can do indirect calorimetry to get a better idea of their own metabolic needs. It's definitely different per person. But then, once you have a baseline established (you can do this by guessing and adjusting, instead of expensive tests), it's about doing the calories in, calories out thing for yourself. Adjust, check back a week later, adjust again, if needed, etc... That's what RDNs do for a living. When they actually have a patient that will listen.
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Okay, so explain to me how I could eat 3000+ calories of perfect quality protein, fat and carbs and still remained stuck at 105 pounds as a 5'9" man in my 20s despite exercising every day with weight resistance training.
70thLike on scored.co
9 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Indirect calorimetry will show the absorption levels for each of the macros, which vary by person. You may have low protein absorption compared to the normal person. That's why you have to find your own baseline and adjust from there. Plus, you could be highly active. At one point, my baseline was 3,700 calories per day, because of how active I was with work, martial arts and the gym.

For your situation, carbs and fat would probably have been a better option for bulking. Things like honey roasted peanuts/cashews are probably the easiest option for high calories that are cheap and quick.
genesisSOC on scored.co
8 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 2 children
Nope, I tried it all. High protein, high fat, high carb, high activity, low activity, nothing worked or changed. So you have no argument.
CottonHill on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
have you tried einkorn bread and eliminating toxins like EMFs, chemtrails and microplastics?
70thLike on scored.co
6 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
It doesn't matter how angry you are at me, the fact remains that you weren't in a calorie surplus for that 7 years. The same way I ate 3,700 calories a day and wasn't in a surplus.
70thLike on scored.co
8 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Also, another thought just popped into my head. How long and how consistently did you stay on that diet? If it was short term or inconsistent, you might have not given it enough time and dedication to produce results.

And separately, did you get your T levels checked? I went through a period of not being able to gain muscle because my T and crashed after using OTC steroids. Basically legal version of steroids that the Vitamin Shop uses to see before they got banned. They totally nukes my HPTA axis. Took over a year to recover.
genesisSOC on scored.co
8 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
I stayed on that diet for 7 straight years, to a neurotic level of dedication and accuracy because I had massive chronic chest pains when I ate anything even the slightest bit of potential goyslop. Yes, my testosterone when I was 105 pounds in February 2014 as a 24 year old man was off the charts high and still is. My weight and health are back now, but no thanks to "calories" or "functional medicine."
bobbacringo on scored.co
9 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
You sound kind of retarded to frivolously discard calories. It's such an obvious thing.
-2
genesisSOC on scored.co
9 hours ago -2 points (+0 / -0 / -2Score on mirror ) 2 children
You sound kind of retarded to blindly believe in jewish lies with no evidence or proof behind them, and infinity evidence and proof against them. Explain to me how I could eat 3000+ calories of perfect quality protein fat and carbs in my 20s as a 5'9" male and remain stuck at 105 pounds despite doing rigorous resistance strength training almost daily? I am no longer 105 pounds or in my 20s and eat far fewer calories today and my weight is a perfect 165.
bobbacringo on scored.co
8 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
You're trying to completely dismiss a broader discussion here. Obviously your body uses different materials differently. However, the concept of calories is that your body is converting mass into useable energy. It's a chemical reaction. So there has to be a measure of consumption to output. Hence calories.


Not sure where the hang up is.
genesisSOC on scored.co
8 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Okay but when goyslop says it's low calorie yet makes you fat despite you exercising a lot and eating high calorie fatty red meat doesn't make you fat despite you not exercising a lot, that's the issue. Calories are fake and gay. Just eat real food normally. It has nothing to do with "calories."
-1
bobbacringo on scored.co
8 hours ago -1 points (+0 / -0 / -1Score on mirror ) 1 child
Your hang up is efficiency. Red meat has a low glucose level, which means that meat consumed is consumed and not stored. Carbohydrates are easily converted into glucose, which is then stored by the body. Hence why cutting carbs, cutting soda, cutting beer instantly means losing the jutting gut.


Calories are real, but not every consumable thing is built of the same thing. Man will benefit more from 300 calories of meat rather than 300 calories of grains.
RoulerBleu on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 ) 1 child
Counting calories to limit the total amount you take in works, regardless of the source of the calories, if you mesure acurately.

Verrified by studies where food intake is monitored in a controlled environment where participants cannot sneak-in extra food.

Verrified by my own personal experience managing my weight and doing the same for my mother to help her get rid of T2 diabetes. She ate the same sugary craps, but in smaller portions to limit the calories in and lose weight. Still got rid of her T2 diabetes.

On the other hand we have your unverrifiable claim from years ago.
genesisSOC on scored.co
6 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
You do realize 99% of all $tudies are jewish fake and gay, right? The same "verified by studies" claims you make also say things like saturated fat causes heart disease, vaccines are safe and sugar alcohols are healthy. lmao. People can cut calories and exercise more but still be overweight and unhealthy because they're eating goyslop food. Meanwhile, you can eat a ton of healthy calories and never exercise and lose weight and build muscle. "Unverifiable claim" is pointless in a world of jewish deception and lies. My experience disproves your belief, and it remains that simple.
CottonHill on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Sounds plausible to me.
Toast message