I was talking to someone recently and they brought up that in many areas White people colonized, White people didn't first come with huge armies. He was saying that White people gradually came over, established trade, made connections/colonies and were otherwise non-threatening to the natives. He said the natives, at first, saw themselves in a dominant position and that White people didn't pose a significant threat to them but did provide economic benefits and simply killing/removing them would be immoral; however, some natives (the racists) were opposed to White people altogether but these natives were overruled. The end result is that eventually, White people's numbers grew and their disposition changed to that of conquerors. By the time the natives fully realized the threat, it was too late.
There were no jews involved in this. This was a naturally phenomenon. I think a lot of what's going on today seems to echo similar things. We have our racists who understand the threat of non-Whites in White dominant countries and especially the jews but the racists are being overruled by the other Whites who believe non-Whites offer economic benefits and killing/removing them would be immoral.
It would seem as if most humans lack the strategic thinking ability to perceive threats regardless of jewish programming. Though, obviously Whites are smarter than natives.
Edit: a mixed method (like the English one) tends to be the most effective one for actual proliferation. If it's purely based off of trade and subjugation of the natives, nothing happens at all to the population, there are barely any French or Dutch people in former French or Dutch colonies (with the exception of Quebec and South Africa, which are both cases of them bucking their own trend). Total military conquest usually leads to a mixed race population like most of central and South America. The former British colonies, given that they did both simultaneously, are typically the ones that have the most white people around. Actually, the mixed method is the only reason why the scenario posited (white people becoming a majority) ever happened in the first place, the British used a combination of force of arms, an ever increasing population, and economics from the get-go. When you only have the power of economics, you won't proliferate. If you have force of arms without increasing population, you have mutts everywhere. If your population increases without either of the other 2, the natives will see no use for you being there nor will they have fear of you and you'll probably just be killed off, which is what happened in Roanoke (and when England learned their lesson to not be peaceful anymore)
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed