13 days ago12 points(+0/-0/+12Score on mirror)1 child
And the funny part is that arguing with Pitbull defenders is identical to arguing with the people defending blacks. The excuses are equally ridiculous, like how it's not the animal, it's how the animal is raised. Like somehow all pitbull owners managed to be bad at it.
13 days ago15 points(+0/-0/+15Score on mirror)1 child
That includes dog bites, and nips where the dog lets go instantly. Now do actual attacks that last over 10 seconds, and fatalities, and you’re talking nigbulls, and nigbull mixes committing over 90% EASY!!!
I also assure that “all dogs” stat is filled with nigbull mixes too. It’s the same shit they do with labeling light skinned niggers, snd niggers, kikes, and spics as white men in crime statistics.
13 days ago11 points(+0/-0/+11Score on mirror)1 child
I like to say that shitbulls are the cleanest Rorschach test you can give a normie.
If they screech and kvetch about "muh bad owners" and absolutely refuse the empirical data that these animals are biologically predisposed to violence, then it's a sign they've become terminally infected with The Narrative. They'll take the core racial programming they've been installed with and autonomously apply it to anything and everything with religious fervor. You can comfortably consider them lost.
However, if someone agrees with you, or signals openness to having their mind change based on new information ("Really? I had no idea...") then there's a nonzero chance they can be redpilled on larger topics later. Some normies are actually not normies, but one of us. They just haven't been awakened yet.
Yup. I’ve stated the same thing here numerous times. The pitpill is a great feeling out topic around normies/new acquaintances to give you an idea of what you may be dealing with.
12 days ago6 points(+0/-0/+6Score on mirror)1 child
Idk why jews suppress pit bull facts so hard, maybe it’s because they know it’ll cause more tragedies than are necessary, but the last time i got into an argument with some dipshit pit bull defender, it was as hard to find stats about pit bull attacks as it is to find info that goes contrary to any of the big mainstream media lies that are used to push various damaging agendas. I searched for a couple hours on normie internet before digging shit up on the old VOAT and TG. Save these pics to your phone if you enjoy making pit bull lovers look dumb.
Just like with niggers, there are hundreds of thousands of news stories, many with vids now. The internet, and proliferation of cameras everywhere has really made it simple to make any idiot who disagrees on niggers, and nigbulls look like a fucking idiot. But hey, as they say, don’t believe your lying eyes.
It’s funny because one of the people who first brought a lot of eyes towards how dangerous, and destructive nigbulls are in the mainstream was the kike judge Judy all the way back in the late 90s.
13 days ago-9 points(+0/-0/-9Score on mirror)3 children
Retarded statistics are great at getting retards to think a certain way. No one in the comments questions anything and accepts pit bulls as more dangerous because of a bar graph
13 days ago16 points(+0/-0/+16Score on mirror)1 child
95% of the ACTUAL dog attacks lasting over ten seconds(not just a bite, or a nip for a moment, and then they let go like a normal dog), and fatalities are caused by nigbulls. This is not up for debate anymore. Anyone retarded enough to say otherwise with a straight face is a fucking retard, and/or bad actor.
11 days ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
You're not racist enough lol and I'm too lazy to link you to the stonetoss meme about this
Some breeds are more aggressive than others, but the training is the main factor above all else. Untrained dogs bite. Dogfighting is popular among nigger culture, they breed and raise dogs to attack each other and it's very abusive. So obviously the rescue-dogs that come from that upbringing are much more likely to bite.
What is the dog breed choice of dogfighters? The big, mean, monster dogs of course. Pit bulls. And I bet you will find boxers and rottweilers among the top most dangerous breeds too.
It's the owners, it's the nigger's fault. This is not a stat about "nigger-dogs", it's a stat showing yet another effect of niggers. Remove the niggers and the stat will change. Be more racist and less dogist. Dont be a dogophobe like the muslims lol
A pitbull can be a great dog if gotten as a puppy and trained right. That goes for any breed, really.
11 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Niggers, and nigbulls are an abomination. Nothing will ever change my mind on this, and by your reply, you actually agree with me, and don’t even know it. Just like most nigbull apologists, you always inevitably defend the breed by unintentionally exposing how shitty it is.
12 days ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
What is it with this influx of low-IQ retards like you and u/CulturalSeasoning?
First of all, TND is an unquestioned goal. None of this will change anything about that. The only question is how strong the parallels are with niggers and humans.
Second, just looking it up, it's clear that Pitbulls stand out by far as #1 in this: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/legal/dog-attack-statistics-breed/ So it is completely out of question, so what the fuck is even your point?
Third, the image shows "all dogs" as the second column. Does it exclude Pitbulls? If not, it raises that value upwards a lot. So it's either that Pitbulls are vastly over-represented in bites against their owners, or even more over-represented than that.
> also statistics are good if they make me more racist or radical overall.
Actually good statistics make me more racist and radical overall, so... so what's even the point of this kikery?
Statistics are how smart people use numbers to manipulate dumb people. Say something is 1/100 one year and then 2/100 the next, did it increase by 1% or by 100%? The answer is that it depends on what message is being pushed. That's one of many ways stats are used to manipulate even when they're true. There are many other factors such as targeted sample groups or deliberate alterations of data for politically motivates.
For example, let's take the fbi racial crime stats and turn them anti-racist by pointing out trends over the years and conveniently leaving out how Hispanics are mislabeled as white. Article headline reads: "*White crime on the rise while all nonwhites crime goes down.*" The article could include the actual fbi crime stats, but the vast majority of people won't click passed that headline.
but facts like, pits are 1% of dog breegs and commit 50% of kills is something kinda objective, and yeah, there is a statistic like this.. normies will ignore it and buy this nigger breed.
IT'S HOW DEY WUZ RAYZED!!!!!!!
weather its Tyrone or Tartarus that killed their latest nigfant hellspawn
If he cannot reliably train the murder out of a shitbull, nobody can reliably do so either.