Consume Product

You can always trace social problems one step back. That's why I think of people who say things like 'everything was right up until decade X' are errant. That the problems were less perceptible doesn't mean that they weren't already there. In fact, that they were less perceptible, more ignorable, and people simply adjusted around them plays a big part in why they were never solved.

If somebody says: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1970s or 1980s back'. What, Martin Luther King Day (1983) and the Reagan amnesty for three million illegal immigrants (1986)? Or the Thatcher government's 25% yiddish cabinet in a country where yids are 3-4% of the population?

Others will say: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1950s or 1960s back'. What, the idiots in this video here? Who, because their lives were more comfortable and less uncertain in many respects, have the attitude that immigration and thirdworldization in what was at that time an implicit ethnostate was affordable and tolerable?

Where do you think the average degenerate faggot or tranny comes from? These Leftists and liberals were their immediate ancestors. Since degeneration is intergenerational - standards do not fall from high to low overnight, but over the span of generations - the obvious degenerate of today has as his immediate forebears degenerates who were less obvious than he, people who harbour degenerate ideas without it necessarily being accompanied by their also living a degenerate lifestyle.

I first noticed this intergenerational nature of degeneracy as a university student. Older academics, while often harbouring Green, Marxist or feminist ideas, were at least still men or women and looked the part. But those younger ones who were replacing them were in many cases some combination of Antifa, 'dangerhaired', LGBT, non-binary, etc.; that is, those who are obviously and very perceptibly degenerate to a non-degenerate mind.

I realized then that the proportions between 'normal' and abnormal were probably already around half with this younger generation. Yes, for each 'normal'-looking one there will be one obvious degenerate. So what will the next (de)generation look like? The 'normal'-looking ones will be in a clear minority by that time. The clock is ticking to solve both the moral and racial problems of today.

Trying to turn back the clock like the Trumptards, AfD, One Nation, Reform, and other pseudo-Right-populist movements doesn't work, because there is a certain inexorably unfolding logic in liberal ideology and values that eventually begets more egregious Leftist ideologies, multi-racialism, and degenerations of all sorts. Turning back the clock will not stop it from again ticking forth in the same way. Thus, I am not interested in restoring the America or Australia of their founders, which can only unwind in a largely deterministic fashion along the lines that they already have, but only in a radical break with this entire unsalvageable body of thought altogether.
 
Yes, ultimately, you can draw a line from the founders to now, even if said founders had no idea that they helped set the ball rolling for the world of today and would likely see their own ideas as errant if they had the power of foresight. Washington, for instance, may well have accepted the kingship that many wished to bestow on him, were he to realize the sheer and utter errancy of the American republic - and that all of his known living descendants were part-African - just some 250 years later.

Nevertheless, that power of foresight would be thoroughly useless if it was not used to achieve a radical break with liberalism. The Confederate leaders accused America's founders of being racial egalitarians to whose ideas they would provide something of a correction, but even they might not have course corrected enough in an independent Confederate States of America to avert today's crises.