How is that working now retards?
(cdn.videy.co)
Wouldn’t want my kids to grow up like I did, do I?
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
15 comments:
12
1 day ago
12 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+12Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Absolutely idiotic. I hate people who have the ability to articulate themselves and masquerade themselves as non-idiots while they are actually MASSIVE idiots, worse than even the dumbest nigger could hope to become.
Oh man, you're gonna love reading this.
https://ia801609.us.archive.org/29/items/kaufman-s-clinical-neurology-for-psychiatrists-pdfdrive/The%20Basic%20Laws%20of%20Human%20Stupidity%20(Carlo%20M.%20Cipolla)%20(Z-Library).pdf
https://ia801609.us.archive.org/29/items/kaufman-s-clinical-neurology-for-psychiatrists-pdfdrive/The%20Basic%20Laws%20of%20Human%20Stupidity%20(Carlo%20M.%20Cipolla)%20(Z-Library).pdf
That's actually quite an interesting perspective with the graph. I never thought about it that way, but it makes sense.
I'd just be reluctant to attribute stupidity to certain politicians. While the damage they cause is often incalculable, they themselves do gain from it. These are often "Bandits" who show themselves as "Stupid", creating the illusion that it was just mistakes that lead to the outcomes, and that these are excusable because they themselves do not even benefit from them. Often they are traitors.
Also time matters. If a politicians, jew, nigger or whatever causes damage to society, but gets away with it, it wasn't as stupid as it should be. In order for it to be confirmed a stupid action, they need to face consequences like lynching or prison.
If the actions jews do ends in their extermination, their actions were actually stupid. They caused damage to us and ended up wiped out - lose-lose. If they get away with it (for too long), it's a win-lose, thus category "Bandit", and *we* collectively are the fools.
I'd just be reluctant to attribute stupidity to certain politicians. While the damage they cause is often incalculable, they themselves do gain from it. These are often "Bandits" who show themselves as "Stupid", creating the illusion that it was just mistakes that lead to the outcomes, and that these are excusable because they themselves do not even benefit from them. Often they are traitors.
Also time matters. If a politicians, jew, nigger or whatever causes damage to society, but gets away with it, it wasn't as stupid as it should be. In order for it to be confirmed a stupid action, they need to face consequences like lynching or prison.
If the actions jews do ends in their extermination, their actions were actually stupid. They caused damage to us and ended up wiped out - lose-lose. If they get away with it (for too long), it's a win-lose, thus category "Bandit", and *we* collectively are the fools.
I told you were going to love it. That graph alone is worth more than a thousand words.
One thing the author never mentioned is genetic entropy. I guess because genetics were a novel thing in the 70s when he wrote the book. But we're all afflicted by that or in our case by its consequences.
I argue stupidity can be caused by lack of IQ that's not always the case. Lacknof emotional control drives the IQ down even for gifted people.
The bandit quadrant is bad because of the scale of damage like you said. That Ursula Von Der Cunt should be guillotined.
Though we can't ignore regular stupidity even though its damage is smaller and localized the amount of stupid out there is the equivalent of death by a thousand cuts much like those retarded boomers on the video.
It's the sum of every kind of stupid and their massive compounded stupidity that makes life so _____________. (fill the blank)
One thing the author never mentioned is genetic entropy. I guess because genetics were a novel thing in the 70s when he wrote the book. But we're all afflicted by that or in our case by its consequences.
I argue stupidity can be caused by lack of IQ that's not always the case. Lacknof emotional control drives the IQ down even for gifted people.
The bandit quadrant is bad because of the scale of damage like you said. That Ursula Von Der Cunt should be guillotined.
Though we can't ignore regular stupidity even though its damage is smaller and localized the amount of stupid out there is the equivalent of death by a thousand cuts much like those retarded boomers on the video.
It's the sum of every kind of stupid and their massive compounded stupidity that makes life so _____________. (fill the blank)
Nice, thanks. Let me go through it:
> Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
Well, it is true. But given how many major corporations, who oh-so staunchly look for the best of the best employees (and somehow always end up with jeets, niggers and DEI-women), do so many dumb things or things badly, it is quite apparent that there are major issues that lead to incompetent results.
Ideologues are literally anti-intellectuals, requiring intellect for the purpose of obfuscating, deceiving, censoring, tabooing information. And I have the theory that we all are inundated with multiple layers of illusions - which might have its roots in stupidity as well.
> Law #2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
Funnily enough, actual cognitive capabilities may be only barely related to being stupid and doing stupid things. The higher your IQ, thus job position and influence on others, the more impact idiocy can have. But I believe there are exceptions on both ends - too smart and your natural curiosity and tendency to think leads to views like ours. Nigger, jeet, Arab, other brownoid and you are stupid in the very most cases, like a natural gift.
> Law #4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individual
The next step is to realize that various politicians who appear to do dumb things are actually just malicious and in bed with jews. For that Ursula von der Leyen whore, the destruction of Europe is not a mistake, it's her goal. She profits from that goal, either by jewish money, power, or ideological pleasure.
> I firmly believe that
stupidity is an indiscriminate privilege of all human groups
Yeah, this is where the naivety of wanting to appear reasonable strikes again, by trying to appear "nice", by appealing to the lowest denominator of temper tantrums - which isn't even read by them!
> Always and inevitably everyone underestimates the number of stupid individuals in circulation.
Well, it is true. But given how many major corporations, who oh-so staunchly look for the best of the best employees (and somehow always end up with jeets, niggers and DEI-women), do so many dumb things or things badly, it is quite apparent that there are major issues that lead to incompetent results.
Ideologues are literally anti-intellectuals, requiring intellect for the purpose of obfuscating, deceiving, censoring, tabooing information. And I have the theory that we all are inundated with multiple layers of illusions - which might have its roots in stupidity as well.
> Law #2: The probability that a certain person be stupid is independent of any other characteristic of that person.
Funnily enough, actual cognitive capabilities may be only barely related to being stupid and doing stupid things. The higher your IQ, thus job position and influence on others, the more impact idiocy can have. But I believe there are exceptions on both ends - too smart and your natural curiosity and tendency to think leads to views like ours. Nigger, jeet, Arab, other brownoid and you are stupid in the very most cases, like a natural gift.
> Law #4: Non-stupid people always underestimate the damaging power of stupid individual
The next step is to realize that various politicians who appear to do dumb things are actually just malicious and in bed with jews. For that Ursula von der Leyen whore, the destruction of Europe is not a mistake, it's her goal. She profits from that goal, either by jewish money, power, or ideological pleasure.
> I firmly believe that
stupidity is an indiscriminate privilege of all human groups
Yeah, this is where the naivety of wanting to appear reasonable strikes again, by trying to appear "nice", by appealing to the lowest denominator of temper tantrums - which isn't even read by them!
Half of these "boomers" looked suspiciously jewish
Its almost as if the interviewer knew which individuals to interview for the desired propaganda piece...
Its almost as if the interviewer knew which individuals to interview for the desired propaganda piece...
They all had an electric jew in their living room. And at that time we hadn't developed the cynicism to limit the brainwashing. Boomers sucked down every bit of propaganda and believed it without question.
You can always trace social problems one step back. That's why I think of people who say things like 'everything was right up until decade X' are errant. That the problems were less perceptible doesn't mean that they weren't already there. In fact, that they were less perceptible, more ignorable, and people simply adjusted around them plays a big part in why they were never solved.
If somebody says: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1970s or 1980s back'. What, Martin Luther King Day (1983) and the Reagan amnesty for three million illegal immigrants (1986)? Or the Thatcher government's 25% yiddish cabinet in a country where yids are 3-4% of the population?
Others will say: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1950s or 1960s back'. What, the idiots in this video here? Who, because their lives were more comfortable and less uncertain in many respects, have the attitude that immigration and thirdworldization in what was at that time an implicit ethnostate was affordable and tolerable?
Where do you think the average degenerate faggot or tranny comes from? These Leftists and liberals were their immediate ancestors. Since degeneration is intergenerational - standards do not fall from high to low overnight, but over the span of generations - the obvious degenerate of today has as his immediate forebears degenerates who were less obvious than he, people who harbour degenerate ideas without it necessarily being accompanied by their also living a degenerate lifestyle.
I first noticed this intergenerational nature of degeneracy as a university student. Older academics, while often harbouring Green, Marxist or feminist ideas, were at least still men or women and looked the part. But those younger ones who were replacing them were in many cases some combination of Antifa, 'dangerhaired', LGBT, non-binary, etc.; that is, those who are obviously and very perceptibly degenerate to a non-degenerate mind.
I realized then that the proportions between 'normal' and abnormal were probably already around half with this younger generation. Yes, for each 'normal'-looking one there will be one obvious degenerate. So what will the next (de)generation look like? The 'normal'-looking ones will be in a clear minority by that time. The clock is ticking to solve both the moral and racial problems of today.
Trying to turn back the clock like the Trumptards, AfD, One Nation, Reform, and other pseudo-Right-populist movements doesn't work, because there is a certain inexorably unfolding logic in liberal ideology and values that eventually begets more egregious Leftist ideologies, multi-racialism, and degenerations of all sorts. Turning back the clock will not stop it from again ticking forth in the same way. Thus, I am not interested in restoring the America or Australia of their founders, which can only unwind in a largely deterministic fashion along the lines that they already have, but only in a radical break with this entire unsalvageable body of thought altogether.
Yes, ultimately, you can draw a line from the founders to now, even if said founders had no idea that they helped set the ball rolling for the world of today and would likely see their own ideas as errant if they had the power of foresight. Washington, for instance, may well have accepted the kingship that many wished to bestow on him, were he to realize the sheer and utter errancy of the American republic - and that all of his known living descendants were part-African - just some 250 years later.
Nevertheless, that power of foresight would be thoroughly useless if it was not used to achieve a radical break with liberalism. The Confederate leaders accused America's founders of being racial egalitarians to whose ideas they would provide something of a correction, but even they might not have course corrected enough in an independent Confederate States of America to avert today's crises.
If somebody says: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1970s or 1980s back'. What, Martin Luther King Day (1983) and the Reagan amnesty for three million illegal immigrants (1986)? Or the Thatcher government's 25% yiddish cabinet in a country where yids are 3-4% of the population?
Others will say: 'We just need the liberalism of the 1950s or 1960s back'. What, the idiots in this video here? Who, because their lives were more comfortable and less uncertain in many respects, have the attitude that immigration and thirdworldization in what was at that time an implicit ethnostate was affordable and tolerable?
Where do you think the average degenerate faggot or tranny comes from? These Leftists and liberals were their immediate ancestors. Since degeneration is intergenerational - standards do not fall from high to low overnight, but over the span of generations - the obvious degenerate of today has as his immediate forebears degenerates who were less obvious than he, people who harbour degenerate ideas without it necessarily being accompanied by their also living a degenerate lifestyle.
I first noticed this intergenerational nature of degeneracy as a university student. Older academics, while often harbouring Green, Marxist or feminist ideas, were at least still men or women and looked the part. But those younger ones who were replacing them were in many cases some combination of Antifa, 'dangerhaired', LGBT, non-binary, etc.; that is, those who are obviously and very perceptibly degenerate to a non-degenerate mind.
I realized then that the proportions between 'normal' and abnormal were probably already around half with this younger generation. Yes, for each 'normal'-looking one there will be one obvious degenerate. So what will the next (de)generation look like? The 'normal'-looking ones will be in a clear minority by that time. The clock is ticking to solve both the moral and racial problems of today.
Trying to turn back the clock like the Trumptards, AfD, One Nation, Reform, and other pseudo-Right-populist movements doesn't work, because there is a certain inexorably unfolding logic in liberal ideology and values that eventually begets more egregious Leftist ideologies, multi-racialism, and degenerations of all sorts. Turning back the clock will not stop it from again ticking forth in the same way. Thus, I am not interested in restoring the America or Australia of their founders, which can only unwind in a largely deterministic fashion along the lines that they already have, but only in a radical break with this entire unsalvageable body of thought altogether.
Yes, ultimately, you can draw a line from the founders to now, even if said founders had no idea that they helped set the ball rolling for the world of today and would likely see their own ideas as errant if they had the power of foresight. Washington, for instance, may well have accepted the kingship that many wished to bestow on him, were he to realize the sheer and utter errancy of the American republic - and that all of his known living descendants were part-African - just some 250 years later.
Nevertheless, that power of foresight would be thoroughly useless if it was not used to achieve a radical break with liberalism. The Confederate leaders accused America's founders of being racial egalitarians to whose ideas they would provide something of a correction, but even they might not have course corrected enough in an independent Confederate States of America to avert today's crises.
I think you're right when you say there's no going back, because what we had back then was already corrupt thus creating the foundation to the chaos we have today..
Though it's worse than you think. In my view the founding fathers were already infiltrated by the freemasons, and by association under jewish influence as such I think when confronted with marxist ideas if they were available at their time some would've been confused while others would've adhered to that despicable ideology.
What we need is to go further back to see and fight for what our enemies have been conspiring to destroy for centuries.
Though it's worse than you think. In my view the founding fathers were already infiltrated by the freemasons, and by association under jewish influence as such I think when confronted with marxist ideas if they were available at their time some would've been confused while others would've adhered to that despicable ideology.
What we need is to go further back to see and fight for what our enemies have been conspiring to destroy for centuries.
Toast message