You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
ScipioAfricanus1911 on scored.co
1 day ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)
>At this point, I believe that almost anything "inhuman" that the Nazis were accused of is most likely a complete fabrication.
A similar scenario- think of every (((hollywood))) movie about the German Occupation of France. Always depicted the Germans as cruel despots raping french women, stealing, and killing with impunity. Except that is a bald-faced lie. The first hand accounts paid a very different picture:
>"The French Population did not seem in any way pleased to see us arrive as a victorious army to liberate France. The had been quite content as they were, and we were bringing war and desolation to their country." -Sir Alan Brooke, British Army Chief of Staff
>"I am informed the Germans did not loot either residence, stores, or museums. In fact the people claimed that they were meticulously treated by the Army of Occupation" -General LeRoy Lutes, US Army
>"I saw absolutely no evidence of German abuse of the population . . The attitude of the French was sobering indeed. Instead of bursting with enthusiasm they seemed not only indifferent but sullen. There was considerable cause for wondering whether these people wished to be 'liberated.' -John Eisenhower, the (((Supreme Commander's))) son.
So if that's the case, where did the hollywood kikes get the idea of a robbed & raped French population?
>"Most Frenchmen speak of the correctness of the German Army's behavior. They seem particularly impressed that German soldiers were shot for incivility to women and compare this with the American troops' bad behavior towards women. Unfortunately most of these undisciplined acts were caused by colored troops." -Capt. BH Liddell Hart
As usual kikes & their All-lies puppets did what they always do: accuse their opponent of the evil shit they themselves have done.
A similar scenario- think of every (((hollywood))) movie about the German Occupation of France. Always depicted the Germans as cruel despots raping french women, stealing, and killing with impunity. Except that is a bald-faced lie. The first hand accounts paid a very different picture:
>"The French Population did not seem in any way pleased to see us arrive as a victorious army to liberate France. The had been quite content as they were, and we were bringing war and desolation to their country." -Sir Alan Brooke, British Army Chief of Staff
>"I am informed the Germans did not loot either residence, stores, or museums. In fact the people claimed that they were meticulously treated by the Army of Occupation" -General LeRoy Lutes, US Army
>"I saw absolutely no evidence of German abuse of the population . . The attitude of the French was sobering indeed. Instead of bursting with enthusiasm they seemed not only indifferent but sullen. There was considerable cause for wondering whether these people wished to be 'liberated.' -John Eisenhower, the (((Supreme Commander's))) son.
So if that's the case, where did the hollywood kikes get the idea of a robbed & raped French population?
>"Most Frenchmen speak of the correctness of the German Army's behavior. They seem particularly impressed that German soldiers were shot for incivility to women and compare this with the American troops' bad behavior towards women. Unfortunately most of these undisciplined acts were caused by colored troops." -Capt. BH Liddell Hart
As usual kikes & their All-lies puppets did what they always do: accuse their opponent of the evil shit they themselves have done.