1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
It's in the subtext. The call to action doesn't need to be something specific (especially because the most useful ones are judicially challenged.) But even a small change in rhetorical sentiment makes a world of difference in how the message lands.
"Imagine if our leaders actually cared about White people" = limp-dicked passivity.
"European people in every Western nation need to stand together against their corrupt leaders and make this happen again" = based, plausibly deniable for social media.
I'm terminally online enough that these signals are *loud* to me.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
when you put it like that, it makes sense. yeah, you have a point. still i'd have a gentler hand when pointing this out to people, you'd be amazed how rationality can go out the window when someone feels attacked or slighted.
I'm jaded though, especially in a digital context. When I see something like this, I immediately assume "grifter/terminal coward" and am provoked to derision.
If I were engaging with the person more directly and couldn't get a read based on their public activity, I would likely feel them out more subtly. But I don't use X, so I don't really have to incorporate that variable here.
"Imagine if our leaders actually cared about White people" = limp-dicked passivity.
"European people in every Western nation need to stand together against their corrupt leaders and make this happen again" = based, plausibly deniable for social media.
I'm terminally online enough that these signals are *loud* to me.
I'm jaded though, especially in a digital context. When I see something like this, I immediately assume "grifter/terminal coward" and am provoked to derision.
If I were engaging with the person more directly and couldn't get a read based on their public activity, I would likely feel them out more subtly. But I don't use X, so I don't really have to incorporate that variable here.