You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
ImBillCurtis on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
You’re missing the point.
The foundational science is bunk. The “DNA testing” (which I’ve had done also) is all built on that. Watson and Crick’s double helix experiment did not make a single measurement in their entire paper. Go read it. No other lab has been able to provide an electron micrograph of de-oxyribonucleic, double helix or otherwise. Case in point: PCR is the method which all that “DNA testing” uses. Yet, every time people test the validity of the test by sending samples to different independent labs, they get different results. See: COVID testing for the last 5 years.
The true “genetic material” is the proteins, which was the assumption for a hundred years before the “DNA” theory.
What are you talking about? DNA has been sequenced, for many animals, which how they're able to calculate that most mammals share over 95% of their DNA (because most mammals are extremely similar from a biological standpoint). And I specifically used the word "calculate". It isn't a guess or a theory.
The foundational science is bunk. The “DNA testing” (which I’ve had done also) is all built on that. Watson and Crick’s double helix experiment did not make a single measurement in their entire paper. Go read it. No other lab has been able to provide an electron micrograph of de-oxyribonucleic, double helix or otherwise. Case in point: PCR is the method which all that “DNA testing” uses. Yet, every time people test the validity of the test by sending samples to different independent labs, they get different results. See: COVID testing for the last 5 years.
The true “genetic material” is the proteins, which was the assumption for a hundred years before the “DNA” theory.
So did they provide electron micrographs or not?