You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
ScallionPancake on scored.co
14 hours ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
> That's the thing - they aren't utterly retarded. Currently under the "ceasefire" they kill a low amount of people just to provoke the muslims to retaliate. When that happens, they'll take it as an excuse to attack.
Excuse to attack who? Iran or Palestine?
> It will be a messy situation, so it's unclear if Iran will strike in that situation, and it's very likely that it will be sold as propaganda about how israel is again retaliating from an attack from muslim terrorists.
Iran will attack in self defense, theres no reason to think they won't.
They count on Palestinians to get fed up with their "cease fire" killings, so it's directed against them.
For Iran they did try to overthrow them from the inside, having Mossad agents create riots, and having them kill Iranians to create the illusion of Iranians rioting. So it was jews killing Iranians essentially. There is also the disruption of the water supply, which is meant to be the reason/excuse for the riots.
Of course the goal is to have the US wage the war against Iran on behalf of the jews, so they need a quite some trickery to get to that. Trump is just a little reluctant, but he's still their loyal lapdog, so it's only a matter of shifting the optics right.
> Iran will attack in self defense, theres no reason to think they won't.
Yeah sorry, I mixed the both up a little. The procedure on the side of the jews is the same though: Advancing on the optics/information war translates into physical-military advances against the Middle East in total. That goes for both Palestine and Iran.
If Iran fails on the optics front (compared to israel), their ability to retaliate or strike israel is reduced.
They could take the insurrection or riot that occurred in Iran as an act of war by israel, as it was orchestrated and fueled by them, but because of ~optics~, it doesn't *look good*, meaning public sentiment against israel would improve and for Iran would decline.
Excuse to attack who? Iran or Palestine?
> It will be a messy situation, so it's unclear if Iran will strike in that situation, and it's very likely that it will be sold as propaganda about how israel is again retaliating from an attack from muslim terrorists.
Iran will attack in self defense, theres no reason to think they won't.
They count on Palestinians to get fed up with their "cease fire" killings, so it's directed against them.
For Iran they did try to overthrow them from the inside, having Mossad agents create riots, and having them kill Iranians to create the illusion of Iranians rioting. So it was jews killing Iranians essentially. There is also the disruption of the water supply, which is meant to be the reason/excuse for the riots.
Of course the goal is to have the US wage the war against Iran on behalf of the jews, so they need a quite some trickery to get to that. Trump is just a little reluctant, but he's still their loyal lapdog, so it's only a matter of shifting the optics right.
> Iran will attack in self defense, theres no reason to think they won't.
Yeah sorry, I mixed the both up a little. The procedure on the side of the jews is the same though: Advancing on the optics/information war translates into physical-military advances against the Middle East in total. That goes for both Palestine and Iran.
If Iran fails on the optics front (compared to israel), their ability to retaliate or strike israel is reduced.
They could take the insurrection or riot that occurred in Iran as an act of war by israel, as it was orchestrated and fueled by them, but because of ~optics~, it doesn't *look good*, meaning public sentiment against israel would improve and for Iran would decline.