Your choices
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
I'm not scared of faggots, they're scared of me. As they should be.
Same goes with chomos.
E: Typo
Anyway, I see these words as such, not as "phobias" or an obsession. It just means you are either against or for something. Am I against jews, faggots, niggers, kikes, feminists, communists, subhumans, pedophiles? Yes.
Do these labels mean anything? No. Only if you let them, for example by trying to reject them. By not fighting these labels and just accepting them, and not taking them seriously, you disarm their power. Not only doesn't it force you into a defensive position, derailing any relevant topic at which you can score points, but also doesn't work to shame you in the face of others. Instead it shows that you are not afraid of mere words from infantile idiots and dismiss them instantly.
Imagine you have 5 minutes to speak, and you waste 5 minutes on debating how you are "racist" or not. Imagine you can spend these 5 minutes listing all the crucial points about niggers (crime, welfare, left-voters, low-IQ, worse education for all, etc). Then you could ask, if you must, "so, am I racist for being knowledgeable? If yes, now that I told you, you are racist too."
I agree with you completely about the rest, though. I'm much less the "Nuh uh I'm not (insert label) uhhh it's just that uhhhh I uhhhhhh-" type than I am the "Fucking-A right I'm (insert label), is that gonna be a problem?" type, and in any real-world scenario, I have no problem proclaiming to be homophobic, transphobic, xenophobic, racist, misogynistic, etc. by modern definitions, and I'd much rather get actual useful information across then get sidetracked over bullshit semantics. I'd imagine in the scenario you provided, some happy merchant somewhere would be gleefully rubbing his hands if I were to do exactly that anyway lmao.
I do just thoroughly detest those terms being used in the shitlib sense, that of "You're just out of touch and scared of the times changing, goy, this is actually how it's supposed to be moving forward," and generally the jewish twisting and weaponizing of language, I suppose.
I do too. They are low-IQ and anti-intellectual attempts to derail conversations by just turning it into a personal attack. Smarter idiots have developed these tactics in the past.
> and generally the jewish twisting and weaponizing of language, I suppose.
Yes. People have to be very mindful of their linguistic tactics. There are many, and this is one of them. These labels are like packed ideas. "Racist" doesn't just mean you "hate" niggers and subhumans, it also implies low intelligence, low education, backwards mindset, emotionality (thus irrationality), superficiality, etc. Being accused of being "racist" is an accusation of multiple things at once. Sometimes people who try to claim how they are "not racist" are actually trying to argue that their views are rational.
One way to turn it into ridiculousness is to double down. "Not only am I racist, I am high ranked racist even, grandmaster level." Another is to say that at least you are based in facts and science, while they are driven by ideological nonsense. Or turn the ad hominem around - say that person is a fragile anti-intellectual, someone who chose to be an idiot by adhering to an insane ideology like an acolyte. Or ask "so what's the problem about being [label]?" Or just say "yeah, maybe" - and dismiss it quickly, and focus on what you want to say. Or ignore it completely.
Most people are busy defending themselves from these labels, which is exactly what it is meant to achieve. Anything else is better than that.