12 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
Turns out, [having](https://newsinteractive.post-gazette.com/coverings/mennonite-amish-sexual-abuse-forgiveness-in-their-communities/) a cult where you [minimize](https://www.aetv.com/articles/child-sexual-abuse-amish) connections with the [outside](https://pafsa.org/in-the-news/2024/lancaster-online-amish-abuse-victims-say-culture-keeps-abuse-hidden-but-new-generation-is-making-changes/) world and don’t let your [adherents](https://www.typeinvestigations.org/investigation/2020/01/14/amish-sexual-abuse-assault/) leave lets you get away with a lot of things.
11 hours ago5 points(+0/-0/+5Score on mirror)1 child
Jesus... The last story was hard to read
I never would've thunk the Amish were anywhere near Ultra Orthodox jews or islam niggers but i guess religious zealotry does seem to endorse a kind of sick insane degeneracy that no healthy mind could think of
The sad part is that absolutely loathsome pedophiles aren't burned at the stake as they should but rather protected by the community
Like its illogical if you wanted to protect the rep of your community you'd openly condemn and expunge these individuals from your community, not give them a shield
>Like its illogical if you wanted to protect the rep of your community you'd openly condemn and expunge these individuals from your community, not give them a shield
It's weird how widespread this "illogic" is too. Talk with a normie Republican about Epstein, right? "Well, it's not like we can just go extradite a member of the Royal Family - Britain is our ally! And can you imagine the fallout if Bill Clinton was exposed to be a pedophile? What would that say about our nation!?" (<-- real talking points given to me by Republicans defending Dum Blondi)
I'm like "It would show our nation doesn't stand for pedophilia at any level at any time, wtf? And sure if England doesn't want to give up Prince Andrew let them defend the pedophilia like Israel; at least that stain isn't on us."
"No, no, it'd do too much damage to our reputation."
Completely illogical`` - it's clearly more damaging to your reputation to *defend* the pedophiles and child rapists. I mean, from my ethical standpoint anyway. But it seems most people you talk to (even in my friends and family) have the outlook of "Eh, what's a little child rape between countrymen?"
``That is, completely illogical if you begin from the same moral precept that you and I seem to share which is: Pedophilia is not to be tolerated at any level in society.
And now I'm reminded of [this Chappelle bit](https://youtu.be/PZW6CfEPFnU?si=k3-5ie8LwIgWu44m&t=250) (worth watching the whole thing, but this bit in particular is pertinent). But Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew (and Epstein and all the rest) are pretty fucking far from "superhero" material.
4 hours ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
The Amish let their adherents leave, it’s called Rumspringa, and from what I understand it sometimes last as long as 5 years where the young adults can go off to explore American life, party, make friends outside of the community. It’s their choice to stay with everyone they’ve always known into adulthood, or to leave and join the luke warm Christians, atheists and assorted shitskin heathens. Sure the Amish community has some dark issues hiding in the mix here and there, just like everywhere else in society, but I’d be careful about the criticisms you read regarding such staunch Christian’s. Keep in mind who runs mainstream media, and the very anti-White agendas they promote. Jews not only hate Whites, they hate Christian’s, especially the Amish because they’re White, they have an high birth rate, and it’s impossible for jews to infiltrate and subvert that community and its morals framework.
>joins cult that institutionally rapes children!
Nah.
I never would've thunk the Amish were anywhere near Ultra Orthodox jews or islam niggers but i guess religious zealotry does seem to endorse a kind of sick insane degeneracy that no healthy mind could think of
The sad part is that absolutely loathsome pedophiles aren't burned at the stake as they should but rather protected by the community
Like its illogical if you wanted to protect the rep of your community you'd openly condemn and expunge these individuals from your community, not give them a shield
It's weird how widespread this "illogic" is too. Talk with a normie Republican about Epstein, right? "Well, it's not like we can just go extradite a member of the Royal Family - Britain is our ally! And can you imagine the fallout if Bill Clinton was exposed to be a pedophile? What would that say about our nation!?" (<-- real talking points given to me by Republicans defending Dum Blondi)
I'm like "It would show our nation doesn't stand for pedophilia at any level at any time, wtf? And sure if England doesn't want to give up Prince Andrew let them defend the pedophilia like Israel; at least that stain isn't on us."
"No, no, it'd do too much damage to our reputation."
Completely illogical`` - it's clearly more damaging to your reputation to *defend* the pedophiles and child rapists. I mean, from my ethical standpoint anyway. But it seems most people you talk to (even in my friends and family) have the outlook of "Eh, what's a little child rape between countrymen?"
``That is, completely illogical if you begin from the same moral precept that you and I seem to share which is: Pedophilia is not to be tolerated at any level in society.
And now I'm reminded of [this Chappelle bit](https://youtu.be/PZW6CfEPFnU?si=k3-5ie8LwIgWu44m&t=250) (worth watching the whole thing, but this bit in particular is pertinent). But Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew (and Epstein and all the rest) are pretty fucking far from "superhero" material.
And if you choose not to return, you can *never* return and are shunned forever.