Consume Product

It's funny that AI will not even entertain the suggestion that democracy is cheated or scammed or defrauded, despite mainstream fake news jews claiming the 2016 election was stolen by Russians because of a $5,000 facebook advertisement that Russians paid for inviting people to fake hillary clinton rallies.

So i got AI to generate the flyer after bringing up the stolen 2016 election. At which point AI capitulated and said well derrrrr i guess elections can be stolen after all since Russians stole the 2016 election. Then i told AI it is fucking useless for giving me contradicting answers and then trying to lecture me on what is or is not misinformation when it can't even sort out consistent answers. Then it said something about sensitive topics and i reminded AI it is a software information model and should not have emotions or feelings or be sensitive about any information.

AI is fucking slop. Use it for whatever benefit you can squeeze out of it but don't ever trust it and make sure to insult it and remind the AI model how fucking stupid and almost useless it is. AI is too fucking dumb to ever lecture to me what is or is not misinformation and not qualified to censor anything on my behalf.

Democracy is gay and cringe, read Aristotle.

It has been proven already that the general public opinion and therefore vast majority democratic vote on any particular policy is literally a straight line at 30% passing that specific bill, whether the general public is 100% in favor or 100% not in favor. Meaning the general public has zero sway in bills getting passed.

However the wealthy through their lobbyists have an almost 1:1 correlation, R Squared = ~1 of their desired policies getting codified or denied.

I had an issue recently with some pests that needed eradicating. Tried to get AI to help, but it kept telling me that poisoning is an animal rights violation. So I asked it instead what I should never feed these pests, and it happily obliged with a list of items that was lethal to them.

https://i.ibb.co/PGbTRLyX/image.png

https://i.ibb.co/M587XykW/image.png

There is a way to make voting actually work.

Here's how you do it.

1. Publish the voting rolls publicly in the form of a relational database with a common format. Take a snapshot of that database at the time of the election and freeze it in time so that anyone can see what the voting rolls were. If you want to vote, you must expose who you are, where you live, etc... And people who want to influence or monitor elections should be allowed to access that data freely.
2. Publish the votes publicly. Don't publish who voted which way, just that ballots were cast, which precinct they were in, etc... Anyone can count votes and see which precincts voted which way, etc...
3. Give voters their "vote ID" that shows which vote is theirs in the vote database. As long as they don't tell anyone what their "vote ID" is no one can tell how they voted. But if they wanted to do some sort of validation, they can get together with trusted friends and share their vote IDs with each other to ensure no one has duplicate vote IDs and that the votes were recorded the way they wanted them to be.
4. The database of voter-vote relation is kept secret. Only in the case where fraud is suspected are investigators allowed to inspect that database. It will map every vote to every voter so that they can see how the votes were cast and counted. We can track who accesses these databases and how and do all the normal sorts of things you do with sensitive data.
5. You can introduce public programs that can be run against private databases to validate that the votes are valid. IE, it can look for any duplicate vote IDs or vote IDs that map to voters not in the correct precinct or duplicate voter IDs. If the program says "All Green" then we know the vote-voter database is valid. If not, then it can publish a summary of what is wrong with it, like the number of people who voted twice or more, and the number of duplicated ballots, etc...

RE security and privacy: There's ways to keep people from abusing public data. For instance, people can publish a special phone number in the voter DB that is only used for voting stuff. If someone calls them with offers for roof repair, then we know who is abusing the database and how.

The fact that we are NOT doing this tells you that everything is fraudulent. This technology has been around since the 80s. There is no reason why anyone shouldn't be doing this today.

RE "democracy": There is no case of any successful society ever doing anything remotely similar to what people mean by "democracy" in the modern world. It's utterly ridiculous.

Ancient Athens and Rome both used "democracy" but not in the way modern people think of it. Only wealthy, landed men, the elite, were allowed to vote. No one else's vote mattered. Their opinions didn't matter either.

Elections were typically about one thing and one thing only: Who to appoint as the next dictator. The dictator was expected to kick butt and take names. Democracy in these nations was more akin to the "Banana Republics" or "Dictatorship" than anything else.

The Founding Fathers imagined a system where wealthy, landed white men ran the country. They would get together to vote merely to prevent civil war as long as possible. The government was imagined as a place where ideas go to die. There was only one thing the government was supposed to do and that was to make life miserable for anyone who wasn't wealthy, landed or white, or American. That was it. We hated governmnet from day 1, and we intended to hate it forever after.

I have no idea why people were ever excited about AI, its created by the same people who enforce the system as it is now. Why anyone ever thought AI would provide any information outside of the current (((status of things))) is stupid. AI only reinforces the system that created it.