New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
There are significant revelations in terms of genetics that show us that the genetic distance between ALL races of humans (Whites, Orientals, Indians, jews, Arabs, etc) and niggers isn't only large, but niggers' genetics are on an isolated island. It implies there is no actual connection between them and humans. However interbreeding is possible (just like with horses and donkeys resulting in infertile mules), which indicates that there are common ancestors. But they are likely a million or more years apart. And as of humans you see a gradual transition on the vertical, implying that there are varying gradients where intermixing occurred.

[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/scf7s3.jpg)'s the genetic map by continent, plus that of canids.

There is also an argument: The genetic distance between dogs and coyotes is larger than that between niggers and humans. This indicates that IF dogs and coyotes are considered different species (which they are), it would apply even more to niggers and humans. Meaning the genetic differences not only constitute "race", but "species." Niggers are not "human," therefore not a "human race."

It also implies technically intermingling with a nigger is bestiality, thus a depraved fetish. Also one cannot be "racist" against niggers. The correct label would be "xenophobe", which is still a worthless label, which idiots like to use.

There is [one more to look into](https://files.catbox.moe/esrww7.jpeg) alternatively.

Note that even though niggers are on an isle compared to the rest, the genetic differences between the others are still significant. Here's an example of the [genetic differences with India](https://files.catbox.moe/mj79i4.png). As you see, they are vastly different to us.

So when people say "niggers are not humans", it is scientifically accurate. TND is basically like a mosquito, wasp, mouse, rat or cockroach extermination, but with animals that are much more dangerous - like controlling the population of bears and wolves in the area that threaten people.

Link to another post: [https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c)
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
WeedleTLiar on scored.co
9 hours ago 1 point (+0 / -0 / +1Score on mirror ) 1 child
>The moment we stop giving them food, it's a massive starvation event rapidly reducing their population size to whatever they can sustain on their own.

Moreover, this is so normal for them that they have cultural responses to make it go smoother.

What do Whites do in famine times? Make sacrifices for their children. We know that either the natural phenomenon will pass or we will find a way to deal with it so we try to keep the next generation alive as well as we can until that time.

Whenever you watch a World Vision ad, what do you see? Starving children. Adults are fine, but the children are skeletons. I think it's a cultural response to famine; let the children die to get the population under control more quickly. They *never* solve the problems caused by drough so they sacrifice their children to survive.
PurestEvil on scored.co
7 hours ago 0 points (+0 / -0 )
Oh God... this also means that cannibalism is right on the table for them too. Namely eating children.
Toast message