There are significant revelations in terms of genetics that show us that the genetic distance between ALL races of humans (Whites, Orientals, Indians, jews, Arabs, etc) and niggers isn't only large, but niggers' genetics are on an isolated island. It implies there is no actual connection between them and humans. However interbreeding is possible (just like with horses and donkeys resulting in infertile mules), which indicates that there are common ancestors. But they are likely a million or more years apart. And as of humans you see a gradual transition on the vertical, implying that there are varying gradients where intermixing occurred.
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/scf7s3.jpg)'s the genetic map by continent, plus that of canids.
There is also an argument: The genetic distance between dogs and coyotes is larger than that between niggers and humans. This indicates that IF dogs and coyotes are considered different species (which they are), it would apply even more to niggers and humans. Meaning the genetic differences not only constitute "race", but "species." Niggers are not "human," therefore not a "human race."
It also implies technically intermingling with a nigger is bestiality, thus a depraved fetish. Also one cannot be "racist" against niggers. The correct label would be "xenophobe", which is still a worthless label, which idiots like to use.
There is [one more to look into](https://files.catbox.moe/esrww7.jpeg) alternatively.
Note that even though niggers are on an isle compared to the rest, the genetic differences between the others are still significant. Here's an example of the [genetic differences with India](https://files.catbox.moe/mj79i4.png). As you see, they are vastly different to us.
So when people say "niggers are not humans", it is scientifically accurate. TND is basically like a mosquito, wasp, mouse, rat or cockroach extermination, but with animals that are much more dangerous - like controlling the population of bears and wolves in the area that threaten people.
Link to another post: [https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c)
But, to be entirely honest with you, WHG was probably the least impressive of the major groups in the European gene pool. They might have been the most physically robust, but that's about the only thing about them that's really noteworthy. They built nothing and left very little legacy behind. The Neolithic farmers brought the building blocks for civilization, and the yamnaya brought the entirety of european culture. Those 2 being combined really created the nucleus of Europe's existence and proliferation.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed.
That's the only thing that matters lmao, having a chad skull
>. They built nothing and left very little legacy behind.
Hunter gatherer civilizations in general don't really have a genetic selection for high intelligence
Also didn't the farmers mix with the hunter gatherers to build stonehenge?
Modern ones, no. But all modern hunter gatherers live in the global south. Surviving in the cold north requires intelligence. WHG was most certainly *intelligent*, they just simply did not use their intelligence for much beyond surviving, though they did not really have the best selection of resources at hand either.
>Also didn't the farmers mix with the hunter gatherers to build stonehenge?
Yes, but this was mostly the brainchild of the farmers as they were the dominant element culturally and paternally in Europe at the time. The hunter gatherers simply showed that they were indeed intelligent enough to continue this process of what the farmers had already been doing in places like anatolia onward.
The WHG were specialists of the land, the farmers were specialists at building. The yamnaya were specialists at warfare, though pretty much all the major tianyuan descendants seem to have had a thing for expansion and violence, northern eurasians are pretty much the only people who have ever had enormous martial empires. Near Eastern people would usually only conquer others for being nuisances or because they had to. Even the arab expansion of Islam can be blamed on the Arabs playing "monkey see monkey do" with the Roman empire
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed