There are significant revelations in terms of genetics that show us that the genetic distance between ALL races of humans (Whites, Orientals, Indians, jews, Arabs, etc) and niggers isn't only large, but niggers' genetics are on an isolated island. It implies there is no actual connection between them and humans. However interbreeding is possible (just like with horses and donkeys resulting in infertile mules), which indicates that there are common ancestors. But they are likely a million or more years apart. And as of humans you see a gradual transition on the vertical, implying that there are varying gradients where intermixing occurred.
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/scf7s3.jpg)'s the genetic map by continent, plus that of canids.
There is also an argument: The genetic distance between dogs and coyotes is larger than that between niggers and humans. This indicates that IF dogs and coyotes are considered different species (which they are), it would apply even more to niggers and humans. Meaning the genetic differences not only constitute "race", but "species." Niggers are not "human," therefore not a "human race."
It also implies technically intermingling with a nigger is bestiality, thus a depraved fetish. Also one cannot be "racist" against niggers. The correct label would be "xenophobe", which is still a worthless label, which idiots like to use.
There is [one more to look into](https://files.catbox.moe/esrww7.jpeg) alternatively.
Note that even though niggers are on an isle compared to the rest, the genetic differences between the others are still significant. Here's an example of the [genetic differences with India](https://files.catbox.moe/mj79i4.png). As you see, they are vastly different to us.
So when people say "niggers are not humans", it is scientifically accurate. TND is basically like a mosquito, wasp, mouse, rat or cockroach extermination, but with animals that are much more dangerous - like controlling the population of bears and wolves in the area that threaten people.
Link to another post: [https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c)
But, well, the east/west eurasian split wasn't exactly a clean break as is typically suggested. Tianyuan man, of all ancient specimens, was the paternal ancestor of basically every north eurasian group that there is. Haplogroup R is a sister of N, O, and Q, if you are haologroup R and someone standing next to you is haplogroup I, paternally you have more in common with a random dude in china. All of the above are from tianyuan man.
Disclaimer: he lived right on the cusp of when the genetic split would have happened, whether or not he was stereotypically "mongoloid", "caucasoid" or both/neither is pretty difficult to say, although some eastern hunter gatherer reconstructions (the fathers of the yamnaya, who also descend from tianyuan) look almost turkic. Depending on circumstances, some indo european individuals might have looked asiatic as well (though they would have been a minority, with overwhelming european maternal gene flow) but this is assuming that tianyuan man related people were, in fact, asiatic themselves. It may explain the odd random white people (and almost always of northern descent) that are not finnic who look Asian for no reason (like bjork, probably the best example I can give)
The deeper connection might also potentially explain the almost eerily similar continuity between yamnaya-scythians/sakai-turkics-huns-mongols-jurchens-manchus. It would also explain bizarre connections between amerindian and european mythology, and on a more abstract and distant level chinese and european mythology.
My paternal family comes from germanized balts, originally. My Y-DNA haplogroup is N. Technically, paternally, I'm also "uralic", but my family has been germanized since the northern crusades, and probably indo-europeanized before then.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed