There are significant revelations in terms of genetics that show us that the genetic distance between ALL races of humans (Whites, Orientals, Indians, jews, Arabs, etc) and niggers isn't only large, but niggers' genetics are on an isolated island. It implies there is no actual connection between them and humans. However interbreeding is possible (just like with horses and donkeys resulting in infertile mules), which indicates that there are common ancestors. But they are likely a million or more years apart. And as of humans you see a gradual transition on the vertical, implying that there are varying gradients where intermixing occurred.
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/scf7s3.jpg)'s the genetic map by continent, plus that of canids.
There is also an argument: The genetic distance between dogs and coyotes is larger than that between niggers and humans. This indicates that IF dogs and coyotes are considered different species (which they are), it would apply even more to niggers and humans. Meaning the genetic differences not only constitute "race", but "species." Niggers are not "human," therefore not a "human race."
It also implies technically intermingling with a nigger is bestiality, thus a depraved fetish. Also one cannot be "racist" against niggers. The correct label would be "xenophobe", which is still a worthless label, which idiots like to use.
There is [one more to look into](https://files.catbox.moe/esrww7.jpeg) alternatively.
Note that even though niggers are on an isle compared to the rest, the genetic differences between the others are still significant. Here's an example of the [genetic differences with India](https://files.catbox.moe/mj79i4.png). As you see, they are vastly different to us.
So when people say "niggers are not humans", it is scientifically accurate. TND is basically like a mosquito, wasp, mouse, rat or cockroach extermination, but with animals that are much more dangerous - like controlling the population of bears and wolves in the area that threaten people.
Link to another post: [https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c)
---
The history of Hungary is a fascinating case of linguistic survival versus genetic assimilation. As a half-Hungarian, your observation is scientifically accurate: modern Hungarians are genetically and phenotypically indistinguishable from their Central and Eastern European neighbors.
Here is an elaboration on why that is, the "Oriental" myth, and the logic behind the language.
1 - The Linguistic Mystery: Why Finnugor?
The Hungarian language belongs to the Uralic family (specifically the Ugric branch). Its closest linguistic "relatives" are actually not Finnish or Estonian, but the Khanty and Mansi peoples living in the Ob River valley of Western Siberia.
The Split: Around 4,000–5,000 years ago, the Proto-Uralic people lived near the Ural Mountains. One group moved toward the Baltic (becoming Finns/Estonians), while the Ugric group moved south and east toward the steppes.
The "Elite Dominance" Model: This is why the language survived. When the Magyar tribes (the ancestors of Hungarians) entered the Carpathian Basin in 895 AD, they were a disciplined, militarily superior "elite." Even if they were outnumbered by the local Slavs, Avars, and remnants of Germanic tribes, their social and political structure was so dominant that the local populations eventually adopted the Magyar language to move up in society.
2 - The "Oriental" Look: Myth vs. Reality
The idea that Hungarians are "Oriental" (East Asian) looking is largely a historical hangover from two sources:
Romantic Nationalism: In the 19th century, some Hungarian scholars preferred the idea of being "Turkic" warriors (descendants of Attila the Hun) rather than "fish-smelling" Finno-Ugrian gatherers. This created a cultural narrative of being "of the East."
Early Migrations: The original Magyar tribes that left the Urals did have a significant East Eurasian genetic component (estimated at 10–30% depending on the tribe). Some individuals in the 10th century would have had features we might associate with Central Asia or Siberia today.
Why you don't see it now: The "Magyar" genetic signature was diluted almost immediately. Over 1,100 years, the population mixed with:
Local populations: Slavs, Avars, and Gepids already in the basin.
Later settlers: Cumans (Kipchak Turks), Pechenegs, Germans (Swabians), and Slovaks.
Invasions: The Mongol invasion (1241) and 150 years of Ottoman Turkish rule further churned the gene pool.
Today, modern Hungarians carry very little (usually less than 2%) of the original "Siberian" genetic markers. You are "right in the middle" because Hungary is the geographic and genetic "drain" of Europe—everyone who passed through left something behind.
3 - The Ethnic Setups: A "Melting Pot"
The history of Hungary isn't the story of a single race, but a political identity that absorbed many ethnicities:
- 895 AD (Conquest): Seven Magyar tribes + three Kavar (Khazar/Turkic) tribes.
- 1200s–1300s: Massive settlement of Cumans and Jasz (an Iranian/Alanic people) fleeing the Mongols.
- 1700s: The "Great Settlement" after the Turkish wars brought in huge numbers of Germans (Danube Swabians) and Slovaks to repopulate empty lands.
- Modern: A blend that is genetically closest to Austrians, Czechs, and Slovaks, but culturally and linguistically unique.
4 - The "H" in Hungary
Contrary to popular belief, the name "Hungary" doesn't come from "Hun." It likely comes from the Turkic Onogur ("Ten Arrows"), a tribal confederation the Magyars were part of. The "H" was added later by Western Europeans who confused the Magyars with the Huns because both were terrifying horse-archers from the East.
But, well, the east/west eurasian split wasn't exactly a clean break as is typically suggested. Tianyuan man, of all ancient specimens, was the paternal ancestor of basically every north eurasian group that there is. Haplogroup R is a sister of N, O, and Q, if you are haologroup R and someone standing next to you is haplogroup I, paternally you have more in common with a random dude in china. All of the above are from tianyuan man.
Disclaimer: he lived right on the cusp of when the genetic split would have happened, whether or not he was stereotypically "mongoloid", "caucasoid" or both/neither is pretty difficult to say, although some eastern hunter gatherer reconstructions (the fathers of the yamnaya, who also descend from tianyuan) look almost turkic. Depending on circumstances, some indo european individuals might have looked asiatic as well (though they would have been a minority, with overwhelming european maternal gene flow) but this is assuming that tianyuan man related people were, in fact, asiatic themselves. It may explain the odd random white people (and almost always of northern descent) that are not finnic who look Asian for no reason (like bjork, probably the best example I can give)
The deeper connection might also potentially explain the almost eerily similar continuity between yamnaya-scythians/sakai-turkics-huns-mongols-jurchens-manchus. It would also explain bizarre connections between amerindian and european mythology, and on a more abstract and distant level chinese and european mythology.
My paternal family comes from germanized balts, originally. My Y-DNA haplogroup is N. Technically, paternally, I'm also "uralic", but my family has been germanized since the northern crusades, and probably indo-europeanized before then.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed