There are significant revelations in terms of genetics that show us that the genetic distance between ALL races of humans (Whites, Orientals, Indians, jews, Arabs, etc) and niggers isn't only large, but niggers' genetics are on an isolated island. It implies there is no actual connection between them and humans. However interbreeding is possible (just like with horses and donkeys resulting in infertile mules), which indicates that there are common ancestors. But they are likely a million or more years apart. And as of humans you see a gradual transition on the vertical, implying that there are varying gradients where intermixing occurred.
[Here](https://files.catbox.moe/scf7s3.jpg)'s the genetic map by continent, plus that of canids.
There is also an argument: The genetic distance between dogs and coyotes is larger than that between niggers and humans. This indicates that IF dogs and coyotes are considered different species (which they are), it would apply even more to niggers and humans. Meaning the genetic differences not only constitute "race", but "species." Niggers are not "human," therefore not a "human race."
It also implies technically intermingling with a nigger is bestiality, thus a depraved fetish. Also one cannot be "racist" against niggers. The correct label would be "xenophobe", which is still a worthless label, which idiots like to use.
There is [one more to look into](https://files.catbox.moe/esrww7.jpeg) alternatively.
Note that even though niggers are on an isle compared to the rest, the genetic differences between the others are still significant. Here's an example of the [genetic differences with India](https://files.catbox.moe/mj79i4.png). As you see, they are vastly different to us.
So when people say "niggers are not humans", it is scientifically accurate. TND is basically like a mosquito, wasp, mouse, rat or cockroach extermination, but with animals that are much more dangerous - like controlling the population of bears and wolves in the area that threaten people.
Link to another post: [https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c](https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/1ARwZMDjWb/early-scientists-who-proposed-af/c)
Their average IQ is around 60-70 - meaning the most of them are unable to entertain hypotheticals or have the cognitive capacity for empathy. They build mudhuts and have no concept of art, literature, architecture, technology. Their tribes do not even have fathers - the males just fuck the females randomly, who then get pregnant, and the "village" plus their mothers care for the children.
Cannibalism and "raping babies to cure AIDS" is also a thing. Their population size is defined by the free gibs that is hauled from us to them - meaning they grow their population until they start starving again. The moment we stop giving them food, it's a massive starvation event rapidly reducing their population size to whatever they can sustain on their own.
Their skull shape is vastly different, providing less room for the part of the brain that operates cognitive processes. Their mandible being pushed forward is a strong indicator of low intelligence in the realm of mental retardation - but it's just natural variance for them.
Then there are the niggers in our midst that show their true colors. Gang rapes, professional criminals, even getting into jail needlessly, extreme rates of murder, massive welfare leeching, lack of intelligence, creativity, work ethics, loud in public transportation, the weird "snapping" behavior.
Given all these peculiarities, the actual differences that can be listed are more vast than those between dogs and coyotes.
So what do you have to provide as counter-argument actually? So far it was just that in theory race-mixed offspring can reproduce, which isn't a particularly strong argument.
Moreover, this is so normal for them that they have cultural responses to make it go smoother.
What do Whites do in famine times? Make sacrifices for their children. We know that either the natural phenomenon will pass or we will find a way to deal with it so we try to keep the next generation alive as well as we can until that time.
Whenever you watch a World Vision ad, what do you see? Starving children. Adults are fine, but the children are skeletons. I think it's a cultural response to famine; let the children die to get the population under control more quickly. They *never* solve the problems caused by drough so they sacrifice their children to survive.