Not really sure what to ask here, I think the left focuses more on "class consciousness" as a possible problem to their goal of "equality".
They think a minority of wealthy capitalists are against the workers, so they want to abolish
"capitalism" and property so the workers have a universal kind of equality.
Conpro seems to think these capitalists are (((capitalists))), who maybe are not engaging in "real capitalism". But it seems like successful gentile capitalists or corporations may tend to act like (((capitalists))): towards a "raceless" society in service of profits above any other value in order to "boost the GDP".
So is "class consciousness" something the right-wing is generally lacking, while "race consciousness" may be something the left-wing is lacking?
(Are there some other kind of "consciousnesses" that people debate about and discuss? Maybe in the dimension of religion or something?)
The left (in the US) are focused on destroying everything. In order to do so, they must remove the individual from the equation, since all of their policies end up hurting everyone. They must pit groups of people against each other and force them to fight so that they can lord over everything. And when they are successful, they set up more groups to fight each other so they can seize more power. I think that's called the Hegelian dialectet or something.
They have seized control of the corporations, the churches, every institution you can imagine through this process. Corporations are now focused on trying to destroy as many lives as possible. They don't even try to make money anymore. It's ridiculous.
The important thing to remember is that they don't want a race fight. If whites rise up, then they will remove leftists from everything and reset the culture and the economy and the government. It's not that they don't want fighting, they just don't want the fighting to end. Which is why they are fine with asians fighting blacks or whatever, but not whites. They genuinely fear us because we possess actual power to actually change things. See, other groups of people, when they see their elite are looting and pillaging and raping, want to join the elite so they can do the same. Whites, on the other hand, when they see that, they go berserk and start slaughtering their elite.
The way you defeat marxism and post-modernism is not to engage at their level at all. Don't even pretend like they have anything worthwhile to say. Mock them mercilessly, and when they cry, mock them crying. Grind them into dust. Give them free helicopter rides. Don't treat them like humans or like a worthy adversary. They are ridiculously incompetent and childish and so deserve not even our respect as proper enemies.
Instead, identify real debate or sparring partners, and actual people who have real power, and treat them with the respect they deserve.
Well I think they might argue two things:
"Capitalists" pit classes against each other. They advocate for people becoming aware of this artificial division in order to come together to form their "classless society". So it's the capitalists causing division by maintaining sharp socioeconomic classes.
Secondly I think they might argue that "race" is a "social construct" and another form of division; they'd argue we are "one race, the human race" and that, for example, ICE arresting and removing illegals from the country, is only done to intensify this kind of "artificial racial conflict" created by "capitalists".
While I don't agree with their proposed remedies to this alleged problems, I do think to some extent they are correct in identifying these as problems: the socioeconomic classes seem to be in conflict with each other unnecessarily, and while I am ok with the law being enforced with ICE, sometimes posters on the .wins seem to focus on immigration as solving more problems than something like in contrast deregulation would seem to achieve.
Consider for example the possibility of us getting rid of excessive red tape for creating businesses, of inflationary monetary policies, of useless spending of taxes in government. We might become "rich enough" to a point of not caring about the illegal problem as much, or being financially more insulated from it (while we work on it, of course).