Jeffrey Epstein Wasn’t A Pedophile Groyper
(nitter.poast.org)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
Now he is defending pedophiles and pushing a neoliberal agenda in Venezuela (but not for Iran, for whatever reason, only venezuela). It's pretty... odd, actually. His behavior is strange.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Wasn't he, like, *just* (rightfully) chimping out about trump and the epstein files as *soon* as that happened? Why the switcheroo? He's always been consistent about issues like that, too. To do a 180 in a few months maximum is kind of insane.
The double standard with Venezuela and Iran also doesn't make sense either, like at all. He says that Iran should not be invaded, which is true. But he says that Venezuela should? They're geopolitcally aligned, Nick's always been in favor of the "axis of resistance" too, which Venezuela is on the periphery of. If you don't believe that Iran should be bombed... why Venezuela? You're betraying your own words because both of these people are fighting jews, but you say one should be destroyed and the other no?
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
So I don’t/didn’t even find that one suspicious, but adding these recent pivots now I’m feeling like I’m being ratcheted.
There’s been a noticeable narrative shift recently that I’ve seen from the sort of middle tier podcasters - people who I listen to but who I don’t fully trust, Owen Shroyer and Nick I’d put in that category - where suddenly military considerations trump every other point, and the justification has kind of boiled down to “erm, you’d be a total retard if you didn’t think this was a good idea”.
Like, Owen Shroyer the other day went on this big rant about how he had thought about it long and hard…and you know what, taking Greenland is a great idea, and literally we have to do it. And his big justification after like a 15 minute spiel about how this satisfaction with taking Greenland just came to him the night before was “I see no downside.” There was like no actual thought or…premise to the justification, it was just “consume Greenland, get excited for next territory”.
Nick too, he’s been like “America! We just take shit!” Um, America that’s controlled by the Jews that you were just ranting about literally 5 seconds ago? Like, hey Nick, you and I aren’t taking shit, America isn’t suddenly run by the white hats and Manifest Destiny, it’s still run by Jews.
# LIES.
Again, post your links/ sources. I know you won't, but I'm still going to call out your bullshit.
Second, as other non-retards have noted in the comments, what Nick was saying is that Epstein was conducting a blackmail operation, which is important to understand WHY he owned the island and WHY he arranged everything that he did. Epstein didn't do what he did for pleasure, he did it to entrap political figures in blackmail for Israhell.
The "WHY" matters more than "WHAT" happened. People are quickly losing focus of that, and its that which Nick is drawing their attention back onto. It was a blackmail operation for Israhell, first and foremost.