Everything your ancestors said about the synagogue of satan, the heart of darkest Africa, and the perilous East and West Indies were all correct
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
10 comments:
9
28 days ago
9 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+9Score on mirror
)
1 child
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
3
27 days ago
3 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+3Score on mirror
)
Everything they said about kikes was wrong, because kikes are actually worse than that.
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
Haganah is Zionist. Zionist is simply another word for Satanist. The Zionist NWO has control of DC through Zionist Trump. He's a Benedict Arnold of sorts.
The problem for this dumb Twittard's reasoning, if it could even be called that, is that no 'Alt-Right anti-semitic trope' would *ever* have an uncritical Wikipedia article dedicated to it. Effectively labelling Wikipedia an 'Alt-Right' website is insane.
*Many* Wikipedia moderators are some of combination of openly Leftist, queer, or trans - as a mere cursory scrolling of their user profiles quickly reveals - and you can't find a single overt Rightist who has any power whatsoever over Wikipedia's content. Consequently, the fact that even a Left-biased website doesn't declare it an 'Alt-Right anti-semitic trope' strongly suggests that it plain and simply isn't.
If this was really some 'Alt-Right anti-semitic trope' lacking in historical evidence, this article's beginning wouldn't read anything like this. It would instead be extremely critical and dismissive, beginning with the words: 'Operation Cast Thy Bread is an anti-semitic theory which falsely accuses the Haganah and later the Israeli Defence Forces of conducting a top-secret biological warfare operation to contaminate drinking water wells using typhoid bacteria during the 1948 Palestine war, in violation of the 1925 Geneva protocol. There is no evidence that Operation Cast Thy Bread ever occurred. It is an anti-semitic theory spread by Islamists, neo-Nazis, and White supremacists on the Internet.'
It doesn't read that way at all. That strongly suggests that it has such firm evidence that no one can debunk it. Not the Leftist queers and trannies moderating Wikipedia, not the kikes who no doubt try to edit it to read more like the above, whose edits, much to their chagin, are probably getting reverted, leading bagellers to fear that Wikipedia must be an anti-semitic, neo-Nazi website, and to feel that they are being Holocausted.
*Many* Wikipedia moderators are some of combination of openly Leftist, queer, or trans - as a mere cursory scrolling of their user profiles quickly reveals - and you can't find a single overt Rightist who has any power whatsoever over Wikipedia's content. Consequently, the fact that even a Left-biased website doesn't declare it an 'Alt-Right anti-semitic trope' strongly suggests that it plain and simply isn't.
If this was really some 'Alt-Right anti-semitic trope' lacking in historical evidence, this article's beginning wouldn't read anything like this. It would instead be extremely critical and dismissive, beginning with the words: 'Operation Cast Thy Bread is an anti-semitic theory which falsely accuses the Haganah and later the Israeli Defence Forces of conducting a top-secret biological warfare operation to contaminate drinking water wells using typhoid bacteria during the 1948 Palestine war, in violation of the 1925 Geneva protocol. There is no evidence that Operation Cast Thy Bread ever occurred. It is an anti-semitic theory spread by Islamists, neo-Nazis, and White supremacists on the Internet.'
It doesn't read that way at all. That strongly suggests that it has such firm evidence that no one can debunk it. Not the Leftist queers and trannies moderating Wikipedia, not the kikes who no doubt try to edit it to read more like the above, whose edits, much to their chagin, are probably getting reverted, leading bagellers to fear that Wikipedia must be an anti-semitic, neo-Nazi website, and to feel that they are being Holocausted.
As a Wikipedia editor, I agree with you.
They suck.
I got the axe at Wikipedia, but I still edit it due to having a small army of alts.
During the December 2025 arbcom election, I made sure to vote against a janny that had BLM in their user page and another janny that was an asexual dyke.
The dyke failed to ascend to Arbcom membership, thankfully,
They suck.
I got the axe at Wikipedia, but I still edit it due to having a small army of alts.
During the December 2025 arbcom election, I made sure to vote against a janny that had BLM in their user page and another janny that was an asexual dyke.
The dyke failed to ascend to Arbcom membership, thankfully,
I never had any interest in contributing anything to Wikipedia for the simple reason that I'd *never* of my own volition contribute to anything that is non-Rightist. I would never do anything for collaborative GitHub projects, Wikis, Stack Overflow, or whatever other website that in some other possible universe in which those things are Rightist I might have contributed to.
That Wikipedia is non-Rightist became *immediately* clear from looking at the 'userboxes' on many user pages, including those of some administrators or moderators or whatever they are.
I just looked at a bunch of random users to refresh my memory. Among those with any information on their userpage, I found: an Israeli academic; a 'Christian' who 'supports trans rights'; a Nigerian male who calls himself 'Far-Left'; a German who 'hates fascists, Nazis, and racists'; a homosexual in Texas; and another homosexual from somewhere else in America.
I don't waste my effort, energy, talent, or time contributing to anything on the surface web, such as Reddit, for that's where the degenerate masses congregate, like flies to feces. I wouldn't do anything to help any of the aforementioned 'people' in any situation, ever, and I don't help breathe new life into their degenerate websites. People like that are not worth anything to me. In fact, it came to my attention yesterday that one such website, Stack Overflow, is practically dying off, with the most likely reason being that people are increasingly taking their questions to other sites like ChatGPT. Good riddance.
Finally, I didn't even know that they had elections for anything, but that just shows how little I use or care about Wikipedia.
That Wikipedia is non-Rightist became *immediately* clear from looking at the 'userboxes' on many user pages, including those of some administrators or moderators or whatever they are.
I just looked at a bunch of random users to refresh my memory. Among those with any information on their userpage, I found: an Israeli academic; a 'Christian' who 'supports trans rights'; a Nigerian male who calls himself 'Far-Left'; a German who 'hates fascists, Nazis, and racists'; a homosexual in Texas; and another homosexual from somewhere else in America.
I don't waste my effort, energy, talent, or time contributing to anything on the surface web, such as Reddit, for that's where the degenerate masses congregate, like flies to feces. I wouldn't do anything to help any of the aforementioned 'people' in any situation, ever, and I don't help breathe new life into their degenerate websites. People like that are not worth anything to me. In fact, it came to my attention yesterday that one such website, Stack Overflow, is practically dying off, with the most likely reason being that people are increasingly taking their questions to other sites like ChatGPT. Good riddance.
Finally, I didn't even know that they had elections for anything, but that just shows how little I use or care about Wikipedia.
I almost never edit anything political on Wikipedia for that exact reason.
Non-political Wikipedia pages are good.
I like to imagine myself as a historian/scribe when I edit Wikipedia.
True-crime articles are my go-to, but pages about the Wild West and books that I have read are fun to edit as well.
Not everything has to be political, that seems very narrow minded.
Toast message