So many words to just end up saying: Britain is run by jews.
(media.scored.co)
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
Toast message
No, of course not. Everybody can just agree that there are problems, but nobody can point at the source of the problem. Nobody has any solution to it. But look, that guy was able to express it in a way that sounded smart! That is so impressive!! Good job!!
Well, I'm just a dumb idiot, I can't afford a family and a house. Rent is astronomically high. Things got really expensive, and wages suck. These are my metrics. But sure I'm so simple minded! We get Venezuelan oil haha, sure everything will be better now!
It's the jews. Remove the jews, and many problems are solved.
I hate anti-intellectuals, but these types of useless idiots are a menace too.
As far as I'm concerned, as in intellectual myself, anyone who doesn't say the jews are the problem is in fact an anti-intellectual. You can't pretend to be smart and not arrive on jews as the problem unless your source of information is so pathetic but a true intellectual will know to expand his sources. A true intellectual will see the patterns and start asking the question to arrive at the jew.
Yeah, well we figured out who they are. But I assume even if we name them, that wouldn't be enough. What he actually wants is to do nothing by keeping it vague forever.
> anyone who doesn't say the jews are the problem is in fact an anti-intellectual
The term actually has a deeper meaning. While intellectualism is about providing information, understanding, truth, reducing complexity, fighting dogma and taboos, anti-intellectualism is the opposite: To obfuscate, to confuse, to deceive, to misinform, to censor, to silence.
So that's what jews do. However people may not know about the jew and are subject to their life-long brainwashing. Our goal is to negate that brainwash. It's not easy - there is no one-size-fits-all solution.
> A true intellectual will see the patterns and start asking the question to arrive at the jew.
Yeah well, it takes more than that. It requires you to be 1. sufficiently dedicated to finding the truth, 2. accepting ostracization, hatred, censorship, 3. not get any rewards for it, 4. go against social norms.
My personality is inherently one that likes to break norms and expectations, and going against the grain comes natural to me. But people vary, and it's not an ideal way to live.
Your friend is a retard. Ask him to explain the differences between any two racially different countries without placing the blame on "colonialism" or some other jew disparagement.
There is a link to an image from Wikipedia that shows the actual 2 graphs. The differences are *really* small. And they just extracted popularity through a little trickery.
That's why no one speaks of the solutions. All the people who would are already banned. You're correct, the ones that remain are just there for the attention, either to get paid or boost their ego.
Oh yeah bro, I was just about to say that MPs signal moral alignment, and launder FUCKING SYSTEMS DECISIONS INTO NARRATIVES.
People who talk like this aren't smart. Smart people speak simply so they can be understood. If they have to communicate complex or abstract ideas, they do it in a way you can understand because they're fucking smart enough to realize that people aren't going to decipher what the fuck you mean when you say, "The state doesn't govern, it processes risk." without some serious explanation about what the fuck you're talking about.
It is also a matter how you convey yourself. Do you want to sound smart but be barely understood (and thus also uncontested, possibly wrong), or do you want to convey your thoughts to as many people as possible?
To rephrase the laundering thing for example (which is something we all know for ages): The politicians act as a layer to push bankers' (jewish) agendas to the people, while acting as a shield to absorb their hatred. And to add to that: It doesn't matter which politicians you vote, because they are all beholden to jewish interests. At best you get a slightly different flavor, if you are lucky. That's not the case with Germany or Britain.
This is totally true. Everyone I talk to thinks my friend is "very smart", and to be fair, he does have an IQ around 130 so he is smart. But he is so vain and concerned with the esteem of others that he does shit like this which makes him sound like a retard. It's also why he's a Leftist mess who thinks race is a social construct and is then forced to defend that position which makes him look retarded.
This is more inline with foolishness than stupidity. You can be really intelligent but also a fucking foolish retard.
In order to be a "good" anti-intellectual, you also need intelligence. If it's too low, you are too stupid to convince anyone, if it's too high, you cannot sustain being an anti-intellectual - your natural pursuit of truth bars you from rejecting so much information and patterns. Unless you are a bad faith actor, aka malicious. Jordan Peterson is an example of a person who is highly intelligent, but went utterly corrupt.
An IQ of 130 is quite high for the midwit range which makes ideal leftists, but there must be some in order to have their ideology maintained. There must be individuals who are smart enough to maintain the institutions that push it, and to get into teaching positions for indoctrination. If they were retarded ogres, their entire ideology would just fall apart because it would be indefensible.
But the trick is to push laws, taboos, avoid debates, and just run propaganda and indoctrination - all of which avoid intellectual challenges which could tear apart their ideologies. They do not have to convince - they just have to manifest the systems.