You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
-1
Aaron_Brightflame on scored.co
12 hours ago-1 points(+0/-0/-1Score on mirror)1 child
Would it be fair to say that leftism/communism/socialism, (All same thing, whatever you want to call it) and rightism/fascism/capitalism, (All same thing, whatever you want to call it) are two sides of the same dirty, clipped shekel?
Do feel free to correct me if you believe that assumption of mine to not be a fair assumption.
7 hours ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
> Would it be fair to say that
No. The differences are actually extreme. I believed it many years ago to some degree as well, but I was wrong. Also there are significant differences between the right-wing section you mentioned.
---
Leftism/communism/socialism: They believe in egalitarianism, that every human is born equal, and only different due to society. Thus implying that society is corrupt and must be changed. As such, niggers are actually just like you, but racism and discrimination causes them to be as they are. Women are just like men, but patriarchy and sexism causes them to be as they are. As such they develop a culture which aligns with the given false prejudices, thus naturally they need to rebel against what they are and what they want. This applies to every group EXCEPT White men, because *we* are guilty of everything. And the less they are able to succeed, the more it's our fault for still obstructing them "unconsciously." That's where things like "micro-aggressions" come from.
So in essence they are indeed very similar as they use a shared ideological foundation. The differ only in magnitude and practicality, essentially just circumstantial differences. "We want capitalism, but we want White men to bleed too."
---
Conservatism: They believe in the maintaining of natural values, but stick more to the status quo. As such they are feckless fence-sitters, and ***doing nothing*** is like a sacred mantra to them. As such they accept whatever changes leftists have made and barely seek to change (revert) them - thus they are effectively less retarded leftists.
---
Libertarianism (capitalists): They believe in an enhanced moral code, which leads to the government infringing *less* on the rights and properties of individuals, thus leading to more individual liberties. "Capitalism" (aka "free market") is a natural consequence of people working and having an economy. They believe that freedom will lead to best outcomes, by the very fact that the government doesn't subsidize bad behaviors (welfare, corporate bailouts, finance system).
---
Fascism/National Socialism: They deviate from all others. Like conservatives they believe in natural values, but unlike them they realize actions have to be taken to pursue it. One point is that foreigners should not rule over you - which is common sense, otherwise it would be like a foreign occupation, a vassal state, in which the population pays taxes for the sake of foreigners. The jews are a prime example and the biggest issue of foreigners, because they 1. do not share your ethical values or your culture, 2. they are not one of your people (genetically), 3. they are parasitic, exploitative, tyrannical, abusive, and we have plenty of examples of jewish regimes that lead to corruption and misery.
It would be obvious if a Chinese, Indian or other brownoid would rule over you, but jews have the peculiar trait that they can get away as "one of you" for enough people. We call these shapeshifters, because for jews the interests of jews is number 1 priority. And that is natural - this is how it should be - but just like that they should not rule over us.
---
Then there are people like me who go a step further, and that is the consequence of modern times with "mass immigration", realizing that all foreigners are bad for us, shouldn't rule over us, commit crime and fraud a lot, are deeply involved with corruption, and that includes jews. We are also aware of jews and history, indicating that any half-measure is insufficient. We are also aware about the lesser races, and that Africans aren't even human, scientifically speaking.
It is clear that the potential outcomes are these:
- Race wars (go the libertarian route and strip them of welfare, see how long it takes until brownoids assault grandmas) (or see how long deportation will go peacefully, especially diplomatically)
- Extinction (nobody does anything, we get demographically destroyed until our numbers are too low to fight - and be assured they will give us the rest)
- Do Nothing (and let future generations fight, who will have it harder than us, so this makes extinction more probable).
The ideal solution is to have a government that adheres to this and handles the foreigner problem on a large-scale collective basis, as to prevent people from being harassed, raped and killed and speed up the process. It means the extermination of all non-Whites in our countries, with jews being highest priority targets, as they are the greatest threat.
> Um, so why didn't actual fascist governments do the Ideal solution thing that you talked about?
They did. They removed jews from positions of power, influence and finance. For Germany it caused a massive economic-cultural recovery, causing it to go from a desolate shithole with degeneracy (including child prostitution) and hyperinflation into a global superpower. But in 1933 it was decided by the West (jews), that Germany had to be destroyed at all costs, and in 1939 Poland *somehow* started to massacre Germans in occupied Danzig.
But they didn't do the last step which I stand for. So the jewish problem was never solved long-term, made up the holocaust as atrocity propaganda, and since then milked Germany dry as they run all the media. Then 2015 Merkel, who announced in 2010 that multiculturalism is dead in Germany, just hauled in infinite subhumans who were called "refugees." And then mass rapes happened, and Christmas markets got their "Merkelsteine" to prevent muslims in trucks crashing into them.
> They gave the bankers free summer camps, which caused a war
Well, the idea was that 1. the jews were responsible for most problems, and 2. they declared an international war on Germany in 1933, where some German jews acted upon. So just as the US put Japanese into internment camps, so did the Germans - but in that case rightfully so.
The war was caused because Hitler arrested a Rothschild and overthrew their rotten finance system.
> which caused millions of Europeans to die.
The jews pushed propaganda since 1933. Remember how Germany was supposedly wanting to conquer the world? And if the Americans don't stop them, they'll arrive over there? And how we'll all be speaking German? That's the wartime propaganda.
Hitler made multiple peace offers to Britain, and hesitated to bomb them. At the beginning they bombed flyers, which the British quickly picked up and removed.
For some reason the propaganda was super effective. From 1933 onward the fate for Germany was sealed. All the deaths were caused by jews.
Do feel free to correct me if you believe that assumption of mine to not be a fair assumption.
No. The differences are actually extreme. I believed it many years ago to some degree as well, but I was wrong. Also there are significant differences between the right-wing section you mentioned.
---
Leftism/communism/socialism: They believe in egalitarianism, that every human is born equal, and only different due to society. Thus implying that society is corrupt and must be changed. As such, niggers are actually just like you, but racism and discrimination causes them to be as they are. Women are just like men, but patriarchy and sexism causes them to be as they are. As such they develop a culture which aligns with the given false prejudices, thus naturally they need to rebel against what they are and what they want. This applies to every group EXCEPT White men, because *we* are guilty of everything. And the less they are able to succeed, the more it's our fault for still obstructing them "unconsciously." That's where things like "micro-aggressions" come from.
So in essence they are indeed very similar as they use a shared ideological foundation. The differ only in magnitude and practicality, essentially just circumstantial differences. "We want capitalism, but we want White men to bleed too."
---
Conservatism: They believe in the maintaining of natural values, but stick more to the status quo. As such they are feckless fence-sitters, and ***doing nothing*** is like a sacred mantra to them. As such they accept whatever changes leftists have made and barely seek to change (revert) them - thus they are effectively less retarded leftists.
---
Libertarianism (capitalists): They believe in an enhanced moral code, which leads to the government infringing *less* on the rights and properties of individuals, thus leading to more individual liberties. "Capitalism" (aka "free market") is a natural consequence of people working and having an economy. They believe that freedom will lead to best outcomes, by the very fact that the government doesn't subsidize bad behaviors (welfare, corporate bailouts, finance system).
---
Fascism/National Socialism: They deviate from all others. Like conservatives they believe in natural values, but unlike them they realize actions have to be taken to pursue it. One point is that foreigners should not rule over you - which is common sense, otherwise it would be like a foreign occupation, a vassal state, in which the population pays taxes for the sake of foreigners. The jews are a prime example and the biggest issue of foreigners, because they 1. do not share your ethical values or your culture, 2. they are not one of your people (genetically), 3. they are parasitic, exploitative, tyrannical, abusive, and we have plenty of examples of jewish regimes that lead to corruption and misery.
It would be obvious if a Chinese, Indian or other brownoid would rule over you, but jews have the peculiar trait that they can get away as "one of you" for enough people. We call these shapeshifters, because for jews the interests of jews is number 1 priority. And that is natural - this is how it should be - but just like that they should not rule over us.
---
Then there are people like me who go a step further, and that is the consequence of modern times with "mass immigration", realizing that all foreigners are bad for us, shouldn't rule over us, commit crime and fraud a lot, are deeply involved with corruption, and that includes jews. We are also aware of jews and history, indicating that any half-measure is insufficient. We are also aware about the lesser races, and that Africans aren't even human, scientifically speaking.
It is clear that the potential outcomes are these:
- Race wars (go the libertarian route and strip them of welfare, see how long it takes until brownoids assault grandmas) (or see how long deportation will go peacefully, especially diplomatically)
- Extinction (nobody does anything, we get demographically destroyed until our numbers are too low to fight - and be assured they will give us the rest)
- Do Nothing (and let future generations fight, who will have it harder than us, so this makes extinction more probable).
The ideal solution is to have a government that adheres to this and handles the foreigner problem on a large-scale collective basis, as to prevent people from being harassed, raped and killed and speed up the process. It means the extermination of all non-Whites in our countries, with jews being highest priority targets, as they are the greatest threat.
Very informative, thank you!
Um, so why didn't actual fascist governments do the Ideal solution thing that you talked about?
They gave the bankers free summer camps, which caused a war, which caused millions of Europeans to die.
0 bankers dead.
They did. They removed jews from positions of power, influence and finance. For Germany it caused a massive economic-cultural recovery, causing it to go from a desolate shithole with degeneracy (including child prostitution) and hyperinflation into a global superpower. But in 1933 it was decided by the West (jews), that Germany had to be destroyed at all costs, and in 1939 Poland *somehow* started to massacre Germans in occupied Danzig.
But they didn't do the last step which I stand for. So the jewish problem was never solved long-term, made up the holocaust as atrocity propaganda, and since then milked Germany dry as they run all the media. Then 2015 Merkel, who announced in 2010 that multiculturalism is dead in Germany, just hauled in infinite subhumans who were called "refugees." And then mass rapes happened, and Christmas markets got their "Merkelsteine" to prevent muslims in trucks crashing into them.
> They gave the bankers free summer camps, which caused a war
Well, the idea was that 1. the jews were responsible for most problems, and 2. they declared an international war on Germany in 1933, where some German jews acted upon. So just as the US put Japanese into internment camps, so did the Germans - but in that case rightfully so.
The war was caused because Hitler arrested a Rothschild and overthrew their rotten finance system.
> which caused millions of Europeans to die.
The jews pushed propaganda since 1933. Remember how Germany was supposedly wanting to conquer the world? And if the Americans don't stop them, they'll arrive over there? And how we'll all be speaking German? That's the wartime propaganda.
Hitler made multiple peace offers to Britain, and hesitated to bomb them. At the beginning they bombed flyers, which the British quickly picked up and removed.
For some reason the propaganda was super effective. From 1933 onward the fate for Germany was sealed. All the deaths were caused by jews.