You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
3
That_Which_Lurks on scored.co
2 hours ago3 points(+0/-0/+3Score on mirror)2 children
>I thought there was pretty conclusive evidence it came from a lab, likely the Wuhan lab.
Be careful with this. The Wuhan lab leak is another angle. I would put far higher odds on convid-19 being developed in a lab at Ft. Deitrick, MD and then released into China during the military games they had there right around the time the hysteria kicked in. It wouldn't be the first time the US deployed something and then tried to pin the blame on someone else.
Yea, I'm good with that too. I honestly don't care enough to commit to a specific *what happened* - kinda like Epstein, kinda like the Kennedy assassination, etc... we're never going to get hard evidence of what really happened, but we can all agree the official story is 10 kinds of bullshit. We'll probably never be sure of what happened, but we can be sure that the official story is what didn't happen.
That's why I said:
>I thought there was pretty conclusive evidence it came from -* A *- lab
then "likely the Wuhan lab" because they were doing coronavirus research there. But that also makes that lab a good patsy.
There was also some really sketchy stuff around a lab in Winnipeg, Canada where a couple Chinese nationals disappeared with a bunch of virus samples (ebola etc) and the federal government covered it up.
Be careful with this. The Wuhan lab leak is another angle. I would put far higher odds on convid-19 being developed in a lab at Ft. Deitrick, MD and then released into China during the military games they had there right around the time the hysteria kicked in. It wouldn't be the first time the US deployed something and then tried to pin the blame on someone else.
That's why I said:
>I thought there was pretty conclusive evidence it came from -* A *- lab
then "likely the Wuhan lab" because they were doing coronavirus research there. But that also makes that lab a good patsy.