New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
Sign up
42
posted 16 hours ago by RJ567 on scored.co (+0 / -0 / +42Score on mirror )
You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
LGBTQIAIDS on scored.co
9 hours ago 5 points (+0 / -0 / +5Score on mirror )
Australia's 'father of multiculturalism' was Jerzy Zubrzycki, a 'Polish' yid.

Who led the lobbying to make Sweden open up its borders? David Schwarz, a 'Polish' yid.

In America, Emanuel Celler, a 'German' yid, spent 41 years doing the same thing, succeeding in the Hart-Celler Act of 1965.

See the obvious pattern?

You can have multiracialism without yids - you only need stupidity for that - but you cannot have yids without multiracialism.

One of the very first things that the yids do when they are latched onto a host is to immediately work towards flooding it with other foreign bodies.

I suspect that it is an evolutionary survival strategy: the yid knows on some level that it is safest when it is only one of many foreign bodies, because the immunoreaction (i.e. the 'Right') to foreign bodies no longer has a clear target.

Consequently, there are all of these competing narratives and problems: black criminality, Hispanic drug cartels, illegal immigration, Islamic terrorism, Pakistani rape gangs, etc. all of which distract people from the most important problem insofar as foreign bodies are concerned: the Yiddish Problem.

If multiracialism later essentially backfires on the yid, a la in South Africa, whose yid population is now perhaps down to a third of what it was at its peak because the 'Rainbow Nation' is such a poor choice of host for a parasite, it does not really matter to the yid so long as he can find a new host to latch on to. Indeed, many of South Africa's yids have now made large enclaves in Australia's key cities, where they are simply repeating the process of making another 'Rainbow Nation', but, since the population is not 80-85% African, they require immigration to bring about a similar kind of demographics.

Consider how ridiculous it is: two Muslim Indians delouse a few yids, but non-Muslim Whites who had nothing to do with the Akram family are the ones being punished for it, as though they themselves were the shooters.

It was the same in Britain: many of the laws being used against the British Right - as well as the whole anti-terrorist 'Prevent' program - are laws that were originally passed to combat Islamism during the 'War on Terror' days.

Look at what 'Prevent' is up to these days, and they admit that the overwhelming majority of their work is against the British Right. Look at what ASIO admit they're up to these days: they say that two-thirds of what they do is against the Australian Right, leaving only one-third for Islamism and whatever else they believe is a threat, which is probably nothing more than whatever the yids believe is a threat. Thus, large amounts of intelligence agency work is simply to repress in-group immunoreaction against foreign bodies.

As for this law, it has nothing to do with extremism *per se*. Antifa, for instance, will be fine. The only other group that this law targets, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, a sort of Islamist group, is incidentally also the only other group in the land that is 'anti-semitic'.

Ask yourself, is a law that will effectively ban two groups who oppose the yids - one, White Right, the other, Islamist - and no others really about extremism? No. It is transparently about philo-semitism, the Australian 'Laboral' uniparty serving the yids. It is simply a philo-semitic law that demonstrates the sheer extent of yiddish power.

Anyone who sees it differently is an idiot: there are plenty of politically extreme groups such as the Communist Party of Australia (CPA), Australian Communist Party (ACP), Socialist Alternative, Left Renewal, etc. who call for things that the masses would overwhelmingly reject as extreme, such as abolishing or overthrowing 'capitalism'. They'll be fine to continue spewing all of their sheer retardation about 'class war' and other nonsense because the political classes, while 'capitalistic', are essentially in line with them on almost every non-economic issue, that is, their extremism on non-economic issues is considered 'moderate' in the Australian context. Yet you can all rest assured that if any of these batty Leftist groups suddenly becomes 'anti-semitic', they'll be shut down by this philo-semitic law faster than you can blink.
Toast message