You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
Breadpilled on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)1 child
Judah = jews, yeah. It's literally where the word comes from.
Let me guess: "Whites wuz da real jews," right?
> Provide even one historical example of a widely influential Christian **explicitly stating that only Whites can be Christian**
You dropped this. That Chrysostom quote has nothing to do with the prompt. But the fact that you jumped to that unrelated topic is a pretty good psychological snapshot of how Christian Identity's schizophrenic logic works.
> Throughout most of history, it wasn't even necessary because Europe was still European and we didn't begin colonizing so much yet.
And yet, the second they did travel to third world nations, their immediate and universal response in light of their faith was "These are human beings who need the gospel."
How can jews be of Judah when they only started calling themselves Israelites and Hebrews in 1860?:\
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
>You dropped this. That Chrysostom quote has nothing to do with the prompt.
It has everything to do with the question. Everyone around Saint John Chrysostom was White except for the jews, just like the times of Jesus. So Jesus also said the same thing: only Whites can be Christian and hate the jews who obviously cannot be Christian. Now you're projecting your own "schizo logic" onto the argument lmao.
>And yet, the second they did travel to third world nations, their immediate and universal response in light of their faith was "These are human beings who need the gospel."
Not really. Our response was to trade for what we need honorably and leave. Jews have told you "these are human beings who need the gospel" starting around 1500s which is what made Catholicism fall to the jewish gates of hell and Orthodoxy even before that. It was never the default behavior, retard. Enjoy another forever L!
Provided, with context, and proved you wrong. Sit down, shut up, and never speak again until I allow it. Here it is again from Jesus Christ Himself, for the third time:
>"*But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.*" - Matthew 15:24
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
Claiming that Israel = Whites is still dubious, to use an extremely generous signifier. And even if it *were* true, it would still prove you've never even read the rest of the verses in that chapter.
Jesus is testing the Samaritan woman here. When she persists in her plea, he praises her faith and rewards her. It's a literal instance of someone considered "outside" Israel being permitted to enter through Jesus.
Furthermore...
> I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
John 10:16
> For God so loved **the world...**
John 3:16
Inb4 "Since when did 'the world' include nonwhites? 🤪"
> For my eyes have seen your salvation,
> 31 which you have prepared in the sight of all nations:
> 32 a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and the glory of your people Israel.
Luke 2:30-32
If Israel is White, who are Gentiles? (Because that word is such a culturally European term, as we all know.)
It doesn't matter if Israel is White or the Gentiles are White; Jesus crosses the ethnic barrier and brings everyone in.
Just proved it in all the sources above, in three separate languages literally written in stone.
>it would still prove you've never even read the rest of the verses in that chapter.
He goes on to call the Canaanite woman a dog, only healing her body for her faith then kicking her out, showing us how we should treat nons in our country that approach us in actual genuine good faith: aid them and kick them out. Don't let them stay, they are not included.
>"*I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.*" - John 10:16
Yes, he's referring to the tribes of Dan, Levi, Zebulon and even some Judah who left for Europe and America after Exodus but before Jesus that went on to become the Greeks, Romans, Celts, Norse ect., so this verse continues to prove me right.
>John 3:16
As we defined in Luke 2:1, the "whole world" doesn't include non-Whites. See how fast your modern language deceptions and subversions are failing, satan?
>Luke 2:30-32
Both the words "Jews" and "Gentiles" are modern mistranslations. Gentiles in context means "Nations," referring to those tribes who left for Europe and America early. He's saying that they are also included in Christ's Salvation even though Jesus only appeared to those in the land of Israel. It never referred to nons lmao.
>Jesus crosses the ethnic barrier and brings everyone in.
Obviously He says and proves otherwise, which makes sense because God didn't make non-White babies. Let's look at Obadiah 1:18-21, Malachi 1:2-4 and Romans 9:13, as well! By the way, have you ever seen Whites have non-White babies? No? Then why the fuck are you still trying to argue?
Let me guess: "Whites wuz da real jews," right?
> Provide even one historical example of a widely influential Christian **explicitly stating that only Whites can be Christian**
You dropped this. That Chrysostom quote has nothing to do with the prompt. But the fact that you jumped to that unrelated topic is a pretty good psychological snapshot of how Christian Identity's schizophrenic logic works.
> Throughout most of history, it wasn't even necessary because Europe was still European and we didn't begin colonizing so much yet.
And yet, the second they did travel to third world nations, their immediate and universal response in light of their faith was "These are human beings who need the gospel."
https://i.ibb.co/x87q6VNL/5.png\
https://i.ibb.co/p6D072gF/6.png\
https://i.ibb.co/29rHFkz/7.png\
https://i.ibb.co/21gWSP0x/34324.jpg\
https://i.ibb.co/dwJ3wwqp/15.png\
https://www.amazon.com/Who-Esau-Edom-Charles-Weisman/dp/1929205007\
https://web.archive.org/\web/20100611004254/https://www.eutimes.net/2010/06/king-tuts-dna-is-western-european/\
https://www.associationcovenantpeople.org/the-behistun-inscription/\
https://www.amazon.com/Missing-Links-Discovered-Assyrian-Tablets/dp/0934666156\
https://www.jstor.org/stable/41715497\
"The light skin colour of today's Europeans is primarily based on non-synonymous SNPs of the genes SLC24A5 and SLC45A2, the geographical origin of which is western Asia and the Near East [Eden]." - Prof. Carsten Carlberg & Andrea Hanel - Skin colour and vitamin D: An update, Experimental Dermatology Volume 29, Issue 9, p. 864- 875, September 2020 (DOI: 10.1111/exd. 14142)
>You dropped this. That Chrysostom quote has nothing to do with the prompt.
It has everything to do with the question. Everyone around Saint John Chrysostom was White except for the jews, just like the times of Jesus. So Jesus also said the same thing: only Whites can be Christian and hate the jews who obviously cannot be Christian. Now you're projecting your own "schizo logic" onto the argument lmao.
>And yet, the second they did travel to third world nations, their immediate and universal response in light of their faith was "These are human beings who need the gospel."
Not really. Our response was to trade for what we need honorably and leave. Jews have told you "these are human beings who need the gospel" starting around 1500s which is what made Catholicism fall to the jewish gates of hell and Orthodoxy even before that. It was never the default behavior, retard. Enjoy another forever L!
>"*But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.*" - Matthew 15:24
Jesus is testing the Samaritan woman here. When she persists in her plea, he praises her faith and rewards her. It's a literal instance of someone considered "outside" Israel being permitted to enter through Jesus.
Furthermore...
> I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.
John 10:16
> For God so loved **the world...**
John 3:16
Inb4 "Since when did 'the world' include nonwhites? 🤪"
> For my eyes have seen your salvation,
> 31 which you have prepared in the sight of all nations:
> 32 a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and the glory of your people Israel.
Luke 2:30-32
If Israel is White, who are Gentiles? (Because that word is such a culturally European term, as we all know.)
It doesn't matter if Israel is White or the Gentiles are White; Jesus crosses the ethnic barrier and brings everyone in.
Just proved it in all the sources above, in three separate languages literally written in stone.
>it would still prove you've never even read the rest of the verses in that chapter.
He goes on to call the Canaanite woman a dog, only healing her body for her faith then kicking her out, showing us how we should treat nons in our country that approach us in actual genuine good faith: aid them and kick them out. Don't let them stay, they are not included.
>"*I have other sheep that are not of this sheep pen. I must bring them also. They too will listen to my voice, and there shall be one flock and one shepherd.*" - John 10:16
Yes, he's referring to the tribes of Dan, Levi, Zebulon and even some Judah who left for Europe and America after Exodus but before Jesus that went on to become the Greeks, Romans, Celts, Norse ect., so this verse continues to prove me right.
>John 3:16
As we defined in Luke 2:1, the "whole world" doesn't include non-Whites. See how fast your modern language deceptions and subversions are failing, satan?
>Luke 2:30-32
Both the words "Jews" and "Gentiles" are modern mistranslations. Gentiles in context means "Nations," referring to those tribes who left for Europe and America early. He's saying that they are also included in Christ's Salvation even though Jesus only appeared to those in the land of Israel. It never referred to nons lmao.
>Jesus crosses the ethnic barrier and brings everyone in.
Obviously He says and proves otherwise, which makes sense because God didn't make non-White babies. Let's look at Obadiah 1:18-21, Malachi 1:2-4 and Romans 9:13, as well! By the way, have you ever seen Whites have non-White babies? No? Then why the fuck are you still trying to argue?