You are viewing a single comment's thread. View all
0
genesisSOC on scored.co
1 month ago0 points(+0/-0)2 children
Those are contradictory statements. It's like saying you like to go swimming but hate to get wet. You either think nons can be Christian thus see them as your fellow brothers and sisters in Christ thus cannot be against them staying in your land because you cannot value your land over your Church, or you think they cannot be Christian. Which is true because God didn't make nons. They don't come from Adam. Have you ever seen Whites make non-White babies?
1 month ago4 points(+0/-0/+4Score on mirror)1 child
No to your question. And having nons go back home even though they are Christian is fine. Its not a violation of Christianity or valuing my land over the Church. A true Christian would seek to go home to better his home if possible. They wouldnt just sit and mooch off other Christians. All nons need to to back
Again, you're contradicting your self. You cannot see nons as separate as you because the same verses that you believe says nons can be Christian are the same verses telling you you must treat them as equal and race mix with them. You have no ability to reconcile otherwise. How are you loving them more than your self and giving them infinity grace and mercy by kicking them out? What makes them not your fellow brother and sister in Christ?
Lmao you are so close to realizing why Christianity is incompatible with White Nationalism.
Strip away the historically bankrupt insistence that only Whites can be Christian, leave everything else in your rhetorical position untouched, and the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
1 month ago2 points(+0/-0/+2Score on mirror)1 child
Quite the opposite. Christianity *is* White Nationalism, anything else including atheism is man made faith based judaism. "Historically bankrupt" is what non-Christianity is based on. Look at the facts: all Whites come from North Africa and the Middle East. Jesus was killed by jews and then resurrected from the dead. These two facts alone prove you wrong.
1 month ago1 point(+0/-0/+1Score on mirror)1 child
> Matthew 28:19–20: “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you”
It's funny how the Bible is consistently more rhetorically useful to me than the people who claim it as their holy book.
For literally as long as Christianity has existed, this has been interpreted at face value, which is that every nation can be Christian, and Christians have a duty to evangelize all over the world. That's why they, and almost exclusively the Whites among them, have gone to every brown shithole in the world on "missions" to convert the savages.
This has always been the predominant view. Christian Identity is *recent,* and has only ever been fanatical and fringe. There has never, ever been a time in history where a White Christian nation believed Christianity was for Whites only. They'd scoff at you (possibly even execute you for heresy.) That's what I mean when I say your position historically bankrupt.
When did "all nations" start including non-Whites? Because we also have:
>"*And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.*" - Luke 2:1
Same language as Matthew, and obviously Caesar didn't mean to tax niggers and Chinese, not to mention the concept of *nations* it self is a *modern concept.* How many african "nations" became "nations" only in the last few hundred years? Meanwhile, you still ignored both points that each prove you wrong. Remind me, how White and Christian was Europe before 1500s? Just another point that proves you wrong. :) Let's not forget how Jesus Himself *literally says He only came from the White race.* Christian Identity isn't *recent,* it's the default state of Christianity and ancient unchanged Holy Tradition. The concept of "evangelize all non-Whites" as much of a modern concept as every square inch in the world having borders we call country names on a map, belong to some random "people" that live there. You're taking a lot of forever Ls, you should probably stop before you embarrass your self further.
> Jesus Himself literally says He only came from the White race.
Jesus was jewish, nigger:
> 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])
> "You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews."
.
> it's the default state of Christianity and ancient unchanged Holy Tradition.
Provide even one historical example of a widely influential Christian explicitly stating that only Whites can be Christian and that the other races aren't human. Should be plenty of them if it was so very central to core doctrine.
Here's one from Justin Martyr, one of the earliest and most prominent Christian witnesses, living just one or two generations after the original apostles:
> We who once hated and destroyed one another, and on account of our different manners would not live with men of a different tribe, now since the coming of Christ live familiarly with them, pray for our enemies, and endeavour to persuade those who hate us unjustly to live conformably to the good teachings of Christ…
Strip away the historically bankrupt insistence that only Whites can be Christian, leave everything else in your rhetorical position untouched, and the whole house of cards comes tumbling down.
It's funny how the Bible is consistently more rhetorically useful to me than the people who claim it as their holy book.
For literally as long as Christianity has existed, this has been interpreted at face value, which is that every nation can be Christian, and Christians have a duty to evangelize all over the world. That's why they, and almost exclusively the Whites among them, have gone to every brown shithole in the world on "missions" to convert the savages.
This has always been the predominant view. Christian Identity is *recent,* and has only ever been fanatical and fringe. There has never, ever been a time in history where a White Christian nation believed Christianity was for Whites only. They'd scoff at you (possibly even execute you for heresy.) That's what I mean when I say your position historically bankrupt.
>"*And it came to pass in those days, that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus that all the world should be taxed.*" - Luke 2:1
Same language as Matthew, and obviously Caesar didn't mean to tax niggers and Chinese, not to mention the concept of *nations* it self is a *modern concept.* How many african "nations" became "nations" only in the last few hundred years? Meanwhile, you still ignored both points that each prove you wrong. Remind me, how White and Christian was Europe before 1500s? Just another point that proves you wrong. :) Let's not forget how Jesus Himself *literally says He only came from the White race.* Christian Identity isn't *recent,* it's the default state of Christianity and ancient unchanged Holy Tradition. The concept of "evangelize all non-Whites" as much of a modern concept as every square inch in the world having borders we call country names on a map, belong to some random "people" that live there. You're taking a lot of forever Ls, you should probably stop before you embarrass your self further.
Jesus was jewish, nigger:
> 9 The Samaritan woman said to him, “You are a Jew and I am a Samaritan woman. How can you ask me for a drink?” (For Jews do not associate with Samaritans.[a])
> "You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews."
.
> it's the default state of Christianity and ancient unchanged Holy Tradition.
Provide even one historical example of a widely influential Christian explicitly stating that only Whites can be Christian and that the other races aren't human. Should be plenty of them if it was so very central to core doctrine.
Here's one from Justin Martyr, one of the earliest and most prominent Christian witnesses, living just one or two generations after the original apostles:
> We who once hated and destroyed one another, and on account of our different manners would not live with men of a different tribe, now since the coming of Christ live familiarly with them, pray for our enemies, and endeavour to persuade those who hate us unjustly to live conformably to the good teachings of Christ…