Churchill
(media.scored.co)
Effectively owned him throught debt wow
New here?
Create an account to submit posts, participate in discussions and chat with people.
You must log in or sign up to comment
13 comments:
13
1 month ago
13 points
(+0
/
-0
/
+13Score on mirror
)
Permalink
Reply
Mirrored from scored.co
And that's why he ignored the many peace offers from Germany. And why Dunkirk was Hitler's biggest mistake.
Not exterminating the jews was his biggest mistake. Dresden was either 2 or 3.
To be fair, if Germany would have won, the jews might not have had to be exterminated. After years of trying to reform them he either succeeded (which we know is impossible) or they'd realize the futility of that attempt. Either way, the jews would have remained contained and isolated from the levers of power, and over time Germany would have gained a voice on the world stage to the detriment of the jews.
I am not sure if Hitler actually did mistakes - he navigated himself pretty well given the circumstances. The wars were inevitable, they tried to force Germany to declare war against Poland (and thus Britain and France) in 1938. The assault from the Soviet Union was predicted to occur in 3 weeks, which forced Germany to either have them come to you, well prepared, with much better odds, or surprise attack them for maximum efficiency (which was the case).
Germany however had large amounts of Sarin, and at least could have threatened to use it against either side to keep it from attacking, so that Germany could focus either on the East or the West. I think that's the key. If I'd be able to go back in time, that's where I'd have changed the course of strategic actions. Including threatening Britain to bomb the shit out of them with Sarin bombs unless they agree to a ceasefire. And warning Hitler of Pearl Harbor and the alliance with Japan, so that the US would have a harder time entering the war against Germany. I'd also lose some words about the nuclear missiles - if there was a valid target to attack, instead of Pearl Harbor, that would be it.
And given that I can speak German, English and Hungarian, and have the capabilities to convince the German leadership to let me talk to relevant persons (including Hitler), I could change the course of history. The very history as we know it would change significantly. I would make sure that we win.
I am not sure if Hitler actually did mistakes - he navigated himself pretty well given the circumstances. The wars were inevitable, they tried to force Germany to declare war against Poland (and thus Britain and France) in 1938. The assault from the Soviet Union was predicted to occur in 3 weeks, which forced Germany to either have them come to you, well prepared, with much better odds, or surprise attack them for maximum efficiency (which was the case).
Germany however had large amounts of Sarin, and at least could have threatened to use it against either side to keep it from attacking, so that Germany could focus either on the East or the West. I think that's the key. If I'd be able to go back in time, that's where I'd have changed the course of strategic actions. Including threatening Britain to bomb the shit out of them with Sarin bombs unless they agree to a ceasefire. And warning Hitler of Pearl Harbor and the alliance with Japan, so that the US would have a harder time entering the war against Germany. I'd also lose some words about the nuclear missiles - if there was a valid target to attack, instead of Pearl Harbor, that would be it.
And given that I can speak German, English and Hungarian, and have the capabilities to convince the German leadership to let me talk to relevant persons (including Hitler), I could change the course of history. The very history as we know it would change significantly. I would make sure that we win.
>And warning Hitler of Pearl Harbor and the alliance with Japan, so that the US would have a harder time entering the war against Germany. I'd also lose some words about the nuclear missiles - if there was a valid target to attack, instead of Pearl Harbor, that would be it.
Japan always tended to drag Germany down, because Japan had *completely* different interests that had nothing to do with the affairs of Germany, or Italy for that matter actually. They did whatever the fuck they wanted to do.
Hitler had arguably 2 powerful east Asian allies in the early 30s. Both Japan and China were allies of hitler, but China was a bigger ally that was being supplied with large amounts German gear and German training (hitler was a sinophile). Then Japan invades China, which was not really necessary to a single thing hitler ever wanted to do, and hitler is pretty much forced into a quandary. So he supports japan, because Japan is a bit better than China.
What would have, arguably, changed the war's outcome more than anything else is a Japan that moves more in line with the broader axis as opposed to independently. The axis was anti communist, Chiang kai shek was too, and so were the Japanese. A Japan focused more on "realpolitik" would have likely allied with chiang kai shek and, furthermore, this would have allowed Germany to continue funneling money into china's military to the point that a combined east Asian army would have been a legitimate threat to the soviets (which the Japanese were unable to do in any legitimate capacity)
Hitler did most things he could have done correctly. Japan did everything for its own gain, because they did not really care about the axis. China was a better true ally of Germany than Japan was.
Of course, this write up is kind of glazing over the fact that chiang kai shek had his own very major issues as both a political leader and a general that caused him to be outmaneuvered by Mao quite literally every single fucking time. And, well, other issues that caused Mao to even be in the CCP in the first place (he was KMT first). In any case, the lack of a sino japanese war would have prevented a lot of these issues from arising to begin with.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Japan always tended to drag Germany down, because Japan had *completely* different interests that had nothing to do with the affairs of Germany, or Italy for that matter actually. They did whatever the fuck they wanted to do.
Hitler had arguably 2 powerful east Asian allies in the early 30s. Both Japan and China were allies of hitler, but China was a bigger ally that was being supplied with large amounts German gear and German training (hitler was a sinophile). Then Japan invades China, which was not really necessary to a single thing hitler ever wanted to do, and hitler is pretty much forced into a quandary. So he supports japan, because Japan is a bit better than China.
What would have, arguably, changed the war's outcome more than anything else is a Japan that moves more in line with the broader axis as opposed to independently. The axis was anti communist, Chiang kai shek was too, and so were the Japanese. A Japan focused more on "realpolitik" would have likely allied with chiang kai shek and, furthermore, this would have allowed Germany to continue funneling money into china's military to the point that a combined east Asian army would have been a legitimate threat to the soviets (which the Japanese were unable to do in any legitimate capacity)
Hitler did most things he could have done correctly. Japan did everything for its own gain, because they did not really care about the axis. China was a better true ally of Germany than Japan was.
Of course, this write up is kind of glazing over the fact that chiang kai shek had his own very major issues as both a political leader and a general that caused him to be outmaneuvered by Mao quite literally every single fucking time. And, well, other issues that caused Mao to even be in the CCP in the first place (he was KMT first). In any case, the lack of a sino japanese war would have prevented a lot of these issues from arising to begin with.
Furthermore, I consider that Israel must be destroyed
Sarin gas would certainly have changed things at Leningrad...
It would have been better as a possibly never-used threat, just to keep one side away. Threatening the Soviets with it wouldn't have caused much PR problems, but to threaten the West would have undermined the ideal way forward - the goal was to exist long enough in as much peace as possible as to let the word out about the miraculous solution to the jewish problem.
That's why they wanted to destroy Germany as soon as possible since 1933, just to prevent exactly that. Because the consequences would be world-wide actions taken against jews, namely removing them from powers of power, finance and influence.
That's why they wanted to destroy Germany as soon as possible since 1933, just to prevent exactly that. Because the consequences would be world-wide actions taken against jews, namely removing them from powers of power, finance and influence.
Did you know he faked a good portion lf the Blitz? The British army, supposedly to calm public fears that not enough was being done, mounted a bunch of ships guns around London to shoot at German aircraft. Of course shells are totally useless against bombers and, because they were aiming over the city, many fell back onto London and caused damage.
Yup. Should've slaughtered them on that beach. At least the lesson we have learned from the Fuhrer's compassion will make us unwavering when the time comes.
When you have an opportunity to break the back of your enemy, you take it. And mercy with kikes & those owned by kikes is not an option. Failure to observe these two lessons would mean our descendants would suffer as a result of our failure.... the can will not be kicked any further down the road. It ends in this generation.
When you have an opportunity to break the back of your enemy, you take it. And mercy with kikes & those owned by kikes is not an option. Failure to observe these two lessons would mean our descendants would suffer as a result of our failure.... the can will not be kicked any further down the road. It ends in this generation.
Toast message